Illuminati card for Flat Earthers.
(media.scored.co)
Comments (39)
sorted by:
They are still wrong btw.
Show me da curve
There's that number again...from wiki
"In addition to the rotational speed of the Earth spinning on its axis, the planet is also speeding at about 66,660 miles per hour (107,278.87 km/h) in its revolution around the sun once every 365.2425 days."
https://conspiracies.win/p/17txjuWmUG/x/c/4ZDsohr98nA
This is how they describe and teach it
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=picture%20of%20hebrew%20flatearth%20with%20sheol&ko=-1&iax=images&ia=images
I'm curious to see the proposed test of raising a helicopter straight up in the air for 4 hours to see if it settles down in the exact same spot.
If it does it would prove the earth does not spin.
The helicopter would begin with the same angular velocity as the point on the ground that it launched from. It will not just go straight up, it will keep going in the direction of rotation. The force of gravity would pull it along while it maintained its height from the ground. I don't know how the math would work out with a change in height.
The rotation is 465.10 metres per second (1,674.4 km/h).
You really think the pilot never feels that his tiny helicopter is going over 1000km/h???
If your theory is true, how can a helicopter sustain that (1,674.4 km/h) when he turns?
Then it would have to keep correcting itself to stay in the same spot. It's an interesting idea to try.
Another one that makes me think is the fact that all pilots say they don't notice any curvature at 35,000 feet. Pilots were asked at 50,000 feet up and say it is perfectly straight across or flat.
Just some food for thought. I find the subject interesting.
Only if it was in a vacuum. The air column moves in rotation with the planet as well
The rotation is 465.10 metres per second (1,674.4 km/h).
You really think the pilot never feels that his tiny helicopter is going over 1000km/h???
If your theory is true, how can a helicopter sustain that (1,674.4 km/h) when he turns?
Do you feel.that you're going over 1000km/h?
That's literally my point.
You think the planet you're on isn't rotating because you can't feel it?
ROFLMFAO
ROFLMFAO
Im starting to think you get paid to come to this forum and act like a retard. You give people fuel to mock conspiracy theory.
Do you think the fish in an aquarium on a train spend their day plastered against the glass of one side because the train is moving?
Lmfao
Did you even go to school, like ever?
Oh, insults... I wasn't expecting that...
Wait, what am I saying... Ofc I was expecting that. You use insults instead of arguments every time.
Is it though? The wind blows in all directions so isn't it just the planet spinning?
That's my take..one thing for sure is something doesn't add up. Nasa is full of shit about everything. There are no pictures of the planet from space except for images and recreations.
I think it's way bigger than we've been sold and land beyond the ice that's all for them.
This is hilariously retarded.
If the obvious resident shill is shitting on it then maybe there is something to further investigate.
You are a talking Streisand effect. 🤣
Yes please. Take a long boat trip to the edge of the Earth and tell us what you observe.
Why is no Flat Earther doing that?
I want Flat Earthers to do actual research. Unfortunately, they don't, because if they did, it would prove them wrong instantly.
It would be a great way to see what's actually going on over in Antarctica but unfortunately it's impossible.
No one is allowed to cross that continent unless approved by the military. Weird eh?
All countries agreed to this treaty for some stange reason. They fight wars with each other but all agree on this.
Really weird...eh?
That's a fucking lie.
Quote the treaty. I fucking dare you.
The Antartic Treaty signed in 1959. That's just one.
You're a fool if u think anyone can travel freely down there.
U think independent explorer's are allowed to travel unchecked? 😅
That treaty doesn't say what you claim.
Quote it.
I've heard they predicted a lot of things. The cards did.
Sleight of hand right here; "know something" aka KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists" aka the known EDGE.
https://genius.com/Aerosmith-livin-on-the-edge-lyrics
Wow, quite the improvement!
For 4 years I've been watching your comments and you never changed. Several times I expose you to other users, only then you change your ways...
Still not human tho... You really should work on human-type behavior - https://conspiracies.win/p/17txfIOqKD/x/c/4ZDsoKTDovt?d=50 (Look at this comment of yours, so much work for -4?)
It's because of your way to put forth useless information, while reaching no conclusion. Etymology is an interesting way to twist words. But as you can see, it is not the desired response.
Adapt to this.
a) Contradiction
b) Only one way (inception towards death) for each one (life) within implying constant change.
Human aka hue-man (color of man) implies a visible spectrum within moving light...motionless (still) and nihilism (not) contradict that.
a) One cannot put forth way, while way (inception towards death) puts forth one (life).
b) It's ones free will of choice to ignore perceivable inspiration (reality) for suggested information (fiction).
c) About free-will-of-choice...Post-Score (0). I didn't put anything forward aka no offers made.
a) Work implies energy; being implies employment within energy aka reaction (life) employed within action (inception towards death)...working forwards tempts being to destroy itself.
b) I resist judging others, hence 0 upvotes/0 downvotes given, thereby not participating within a conflict of reason (upvote vs downvote).
c) For aka forwards implies towards suggested outcomes, while ignoring to respond to perceivable origin.
Solution (inception towards death) implies erection (inception) and conclusion (death) of being (life). I adapt to solution...not towards conclusion.
a) Way implies perceivable sound...suggested words twist ones perception if consented to.
b) Etymology aka etymos (actual) logy (reasoning about fictional). Using logic implies ignoring etymos (real; actual; perceivable) for suggested fiction.
Desire implies temptation aka ones free will of choice to ignore need for want aka "a craving or yearning; an emotion directed toward attainment or possession of an object; sensual appetite, physical desire, lust".
Ones struggle to sustain life while being moved from inception towards death implies the need to resist wanted temptations.
This/the/seo - "to behold"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/this#etymonline_v_10764 implies being holding onto suggested information, while ignoring to adapt to perceivable inspiration, which cannot be held onto, since it moves through one.
I simply draw from all perceivable inspiration offered to each ones perception instead of holding onto any suggested information by another.
Desire implies temptation aka ones free will of choice to ignore need for want aka "a craving or yearning; an emotion directed toward attainment or possession of an object; sensual appetite, physical desire, lust".
Ones struggle to sustain life while being moved from inception towards death implies the need to resist wanted temptations.
This/the/seo - "to behold"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/this#etymonline_v_10764 implies being holding onto suggested information, while ignoring to adapt to perceivable inspiration, which cannot be held onto, since it moves through one.
I simply draw from all perceivable inspiration offered to each ones perception instead of holding onto any suggested information by another.
A tool for the many to pretend making efforts. Pretension aka professed ignorance...
I thought just rambling about etymology makes you the least person to get a reply in this forum.
Aren't you at least a bit happier because I am the first person to reply to you in 4 years?
You have 0 posts score.
You have nothing to contribute but your chatbot replies.
Everyone in here knows this, even the shills.
You have literally changed nothing for anyone ever. At least in this forum, I am 100% sure. What a faulty chatbot you turned out to be... I guess I can't train you to do my bidding, if your programming was made by a 3rd grader...
You're inconsequential.
Only logy/logic/reason implies ramble/rumble...there's no conflict within etymo unless one chooses to establish one.
Per sonos (by sound) implies each one within being lesser than entire sound. Shaping a conflict of reason (least vs most) tempts one to ignore that.
Form (life) needs to reply to flow (inception towards death); while resisting the want to reply to each other. Few designed social media to tempt many to reply to each other, while ignoring origin for medium.
a) Least vs most aka happy vs sad...different brand for same conflict of reason.
b) BIT, verb - "to put a bridle upon a horse; to put the bit in the mouth"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/bit
Sleight of hand: "bit and byte"... few utilize rhetoric like that for the domestication of many.
Being implies effect within cause...suggested "because" inverts that.
No offer by free will of choice, yet so much offense taken by others willingly...
a) Tribute/tribuo - "to divide" implies setting apart, which con - "together; with" contradicts.
b) That (inception towards death) which sets apart (life) implies ones tribunal aka administered justice aka natural order.
How could a being (perception) within everything (perceivable) have nothing (suggested)...
Who would speak in the name of others? Alas, that's how it goes... https://genius.com/Leonard-cohen-everybody-knows-lyrics
ALL (inception towards death) changes ONE (life)...few utilize literation to tempt many into de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing). Nature doesn't shape letters, it offers each one the free will of choice to LET others shape.
If form (life) claims self as "me; myself or I"; then only by ignoring flow (inception towards death), which dissolves claims.
GUESS, verb - "to conjecture; to form an opinion without certain principles or means of knowledge; to judge at random"....guessing implies ignoring perceivable knowledge for the suggestions by others, hence being trained as a slave by a master.
a) Dehumanizing a child?
b) Can you show me a "chatbot" that can adapt to inspiration on the fly?
c) Does it look like as if I'm chatting aka talk idly aka being "slothful; given to rest and ease; averse to labor or employment"? Aren't my efforts contradicting that?
a) "I am whatever you say I am...cause if I wasn't; then why would I say I am?"
b) Being implies within (life) sequence (inception towards death), while apart from one another...not CON (together; with), which implies ones CONsent to the suggested pluralism of another one...a chosen one.
The Tradition of the Elders (Mark 7:1–13)
1Then some Pharisees and scribes came to Jesus from Jerusalem and asked, 2“Why do Your disciples break the tradition of the elders? They do not wash their hands before they eat.”
3Jesus replied, “And why do you break the command of God for the sake of your tradition? 4For God said, ‘Honor your father and mother’a and ‘Anyone who curses his father or mother must be put to death.’b 5But you say that if anyone says to his father or mother, ‘Whatever you would have received from me is a gift devoted to God,’ 6he need not honor his father or mother with it.c Thus you nullify the word of God for the sake of your tradition. 7You hypocrites! Isaiah prophesied correctly about you:
8‘These people honor Me with their lips,
but their hearts are far from Me.
9They worship Me in vain;
they teach as doctrine the precepts of men.’d”
What Defiles a Man (Mark 7:14–23)
10Jesus called the crowd to Him and said, “Listen and understand. 11A man is not defiled by what enters his mouth, but by what comes out of it.”
12Then the disciples came to Him and said, “Are You aware that the Pharisees were offended when they heard this?”
13But Jesus replied, “Every plant that My heavenly Father has not planted will be pulled up by its roots. 14Disregard them! They are blind guides.e If a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit.”
15Peter said to Him, “Explain this parable to us.”
16“Do you still not understand?” Jesus asked. 17“Do you not yet realize that whatever enters the mouth goes into the stomach and then is eliminated? 18But the things that come out of the mouth come from the heart, and these things defile a man. 19For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, and slander. 20These are what defile a man, but eating with unwashed hands does not defile him.”
The Faith of the Canaanite Woman (Mark 7:24–30)
21Leaving that place, Jesus withdrew to the district of Tyre and Sidon. 22And a Canaanite woman from that region came to Him, crying out, “Lord, Son of David, have mercy on me! My daughter is miserably possessed by a demon.”
23But Jesus did not answer a word. So His disciples came and urged Him, “Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us.”
24He answered, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”
25The woman came and knelt before Him. “Lord, help me!” she said.
26But Jesus replied, “It is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to the dogs.”
27“Yes, Lord,” she said, “even the dogsf eat the crumbs that fall from their master’s table.”
28“O woman,” Jesus answered, “your faith is great! Let it be done for you as you desire.” And her daughter was healed from that very hour.
The Feeding of the Four Thousand (2 Kings 4:42–44; Mark 8:1–10)
29Moving on from there, Jesus went along the Sea of Galilee. Then He went up on a mountain and sat down. 30Large crowds came to Him, bringing the lame, the blind, the crippled, the mute, and many others, and laid them at His feet, and He healed them. 31The crowd was amazed when they saw the mute speaking, the crippled restored, the lame walking, and the blind seeing. And they glorified the God of Israel.
32Then Jesus called His disciples to Him and said, “I have compassion for this crowd, because they have already been with Me three days and have nothing to eat. I do not want to send them away hungry, or they may faint along the way.”
33The disciples replied, “Where in this desolate place could we find enough bread to feed such a large crowd?”
34“How many loaves do you have?” Jesus asked.
“Seven,” they replied, “and a few small fish.”
35And He instructed the crowd to sit down on the ground. 36Taking the seven loaves and the fish, He gave thanks and broke them. Then He gave them to the disciples, and the disciples gave them to the people.
37They all ate and were satisfied, and the disciples picked up seven basketfuls of broken pieces that were left over. 38A total of four thousand men were fed, in addition to women and children.
39After Jesus had dismissed the crowds, He got into the boat and went to the region of Magadan.