They ended up torturing this guy to death for like years.. I don't think he was wrong. I also think Illuminanti is just another word for the people behind the obvious DS.
It's actually another word for the Global Shadow Government of the so called satanic/luciferian kabbalistic "bloodline elites" who run this planet, and they totally own all the puppets (even Zion Don Trump) who sit at the very top of all nations.
Exactly. That "DS" thing have exact names, surnames, addresses, property and assets. But somehow 99% of those who talk about "DS" never name names. There is no any problem to name, say AIPAC tops WEF officers or MIC oligarchs. But here comes crickets.
It is very simple way to release the steam. When it become impossible to deny bullshit happening in the world, just blame "Deep State", "Blackrock", "Bilderberg" whatever. Everybody hate that virtual things and threats and anger effectively directed out from those bastards who doing all that shit.
It just can't be any problem, to say that it is Zukerberg, Brin, Musk and Cook who directly do all that obvious censorship everybody hate, not some faceless "Censorship Industrial Complex". But no, somehow that bastards with names, surnames, addresses, properties and assets are unnameable and unmentionable. "Censorship Industrial Complex" financed by "Blackrock" execute orders of "Deep State" on behalf of "Globalists". See, how they say a lot without really saying anything? And everybody like "Cool! Dude is based! He talk about Deep State!"
Suggests that enlightenment is controlled and manipulated by those within.
a) Enlightenment aka mind (ment) within (en) light...that's perceivable.
b) Light directs rays apart from one another...suggested control aka rolled (roll) together (con) tempts one to ignore that.
c) Light moves...suggested manipulate aka man (hand) pele (to fill) tempts one to manually fill, while ignoring the auto-matic foundation of light.
Implies that agreeing to mainstream beliefs means submitting to control by others.
Agreeing or disagreeing + believing or disbelieving + submitting or denying implies ones consent to the suggestion of another.
Perceivable cannot be agreed or disagreed with, nor believed or disbelieved in; nor submitted or denied without ignoring that it moves through one...no matter how one (life) reacts to all (inception towards death).
Ignorance implies the path of least resistance aka the temptation for form (matter) within flow (motion) to go with the flow instead of resisting. Others exploit this by suggesting one to follow along (progressivism) the "main stream" .
Indicates an internal manipulation of enlightenment, casting doubt on true knowledge.
a) Being implies internal ray within external light. Manipulation thereof implies internal (perception) holding onto (suggested) while ignoring external (perceivable) moving through.
b) Ignoring perceivable for suggested establishes a conflict of reason (true vs false)...which light doesn't generate; but which can be shaped within shadows.
Within these conflicts of reason; both sides are suggesting enlightenment to each other in exchange for consent given aka for ignorance of perceivable, while consenting to hold onto suggested aka by permitting another to cast and shape shadows within ones mind/memory.
To focus on suggested information implies putting a blinder on ones sight within perceivable inspiration.
Suggested information implies casting of spell-craft; while ones consent to another one implies dual-ism aka doubt aka permitting another one to overshadow ones sight within light.
In other words...constancy (inception towards death) generates fluctuation (life) by separation/differentiation into units (Latin unitas; unus; one). Tempting units together (1+1=2) reshapes fluctuation into constancy aka equalization of differences...it's very beneficial for different few to equalize many.
They ended up torturing this guy to death for like years.. I don't think he was wrong. I also think Illuminanti is just another word for the people behind the obvious DS.
DS is just a new Qtard propaganda term.
It's actually another word for the Global Shadow Government of the so called satanic/luciferian kabbalistic "bloodline elites" who run this planet, and they totally own all the puppets (even Zion Don Trump) who sit at the very top of all nations.
Exactly. That "DS" thing have exact names, surnames, addresses, property and assets. But somehow 99% of those who talk about "DS" never name names. There is no any problem to name, say AIPAC tops WEF officers or MIC oligarchs. But here comes crickets.
It is very simple way to release the steam. When it become impossible to deny bullshit happening in the world, just blame "Deep State", "Blackrock", "Bilderberg" whatever. Everybody hate that virtual things and threats and anger effectively directed out from those bastards who doing all that shit.
It just can't be any problem, to say that it is Zukerberg, Brin, Musk and Cook who directly do all that obvious censorship everybody hate, not some faceless "Censorship Industrial Complex". But no, somehow that bastards with names, surnames, addresses, properties and assets are unnameable and unmentionable. "Censorship Industrial Complex" financed by "Blackrock" execute orders of "Deep State" on behalf of "Globalists". See, how they say a lot without really saying anything? And everybody like "Cool! Dude is based! He talk about Deep State!"
sauce on the torture? I see the bladder cancer and curious where to find good information other than Wikipedia.
Damn, I tried looking some of it up.. wiped clean, replaced with calling the agent a conspiracy theorist..
very fucky.
Infiltrated ? No created by.
🧑🚀🔫🧑🚀
a) All is light; ones within cast shadows. Light can only infiltrate (fill in) shaped shadows.
b) Ones consent to suggested THE-ism implies ones submission to another, hence permitting another to "overshadow" one.
THE implies the shadow cast upon those IL (within) LUMEN (light)...
a) Enlightenment aka mind (ment) within (en) light...that's perceivable.
b) Light directs rays apart from one another...suggested control aka rolled (roll) together (con) tempts one to ignore that.
c) Light moves...suggested manipulate aka man (hand) pele (to fill) tempts one to manually fill, while ignoring the auto-matic foundation of light.
Agreeing or disagreeing + believing or disbelieving + submitting or denying implies ones consent to the suggestion of another.
Perceivable cannot be agreed or disagreed with, nor believed or disbelieved in; nor submitted or denied without ignoring that it moves through one...no matter how one (life) reacts to all (inception towards death).
Ignorance implies the path of least resistance aka the temptation for form (matter) within flow (motion) to go with the flow instead of resisting. Others exploit this by suggesting one to follow along (progressivism) the "main stream" .
a) Being implies internal ray within external light. Manipulation thereof implies internal (perception) holding onto (suggested) while ignoring external (perceivable) moving through.
b) Ignoring perceivable for suggested establishes a conflict of reason (true vs false)...which light doesn't generate; but which can be shaped within shadows.
Within these conflicts of reason; both sides are suggesting enlightenment to each other in exchange for consent given aka for ignorance of perceivable, while consenting to hold onto suggested aka by permitting another to cast and shape shadows within ones mind/memory.
To focus on suggested information implies putting a blinder on ones sight within perceivable inspiration.
Doubt/dubious/duo/dwo - "two"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/doubt#etymonline_v_13974
Suggested information implies casting of spell-craft; while ones consent to another one implies dual-ism aka doubt aka permitting another one to overshadow ones sight within light.
In other words...constancy (inception towards death) generates fluctuation (life) by separation/differentiation into units (Latin unitas; unus; one). Tempting units together (1+1=2) reshapes fluctuation into constancy aka equalization of differences...it's very beneficial for different few to equalize many.