Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

23
Poisoning the well with retarded conspiracy theories (files.catbox.moe)
posted 1 year ago by dukey 1 year ago by dukey +30 / -7
47 comments share
47 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (47)
sorted by:
▲ 7 ▼
– Questionable 7 points 1 year ago +9 / -2

ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ This meme is controlled opposition, meant to label and discredit without proof. ㅤ You now feel smart for copy posting a cartoon picture of a C.I.A agent behind 32bit bushes. ㅤ Enabling you and other to ignore logic, and repeat doctrine verbatim.

ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ -̱͞|͞מ͟͞͞פ͟ו͟͞͞ק͞פ͟͞͞ק͞|̊̆ ‡.̗̀́

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– dukey [S] 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

I know this is a meme but there are many examples, ie claims no planes hit the twin towers. Judy Wood often gets pushed and she literally asserts laser beams from space blew up the buildings.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– WindyJibbz 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

That Jusy wood one always pissed me off so much. Even more than the no planes kids.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– dukey [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Yeah I know, and her work is absolutely insane, devoid of any kind of science. I've seen her stuff randomly on youtube on a maths channel .. like WTF. This crazy shit is promoted, and stuff like from the architects and engineers for 911 is buried.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SmithW1984 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Fair enough but the irony is the meme itself does what it criticizes, namely discrediting valid positions by placing them along demented ones.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TruthBomba90 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

It clearly communicates that the "demented ones" are CIA-engineered to discredit valid understandings.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SmithW1984 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I'm sure the psy op guys plant such theories to poison the well. Then they use the confusion to control other theories challenging the status quo (like NASA being fake and gay and macroevolutionism being a scam). The "demented ones" are not all demented, thus discrediting valid theories by association.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 1 year ago +4 / -1
▲ 2 ▼
– WeedleTLiar 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

A true conspiracy theory doesn't need proof, but it does need to conform to the observable facts. If it doesn't, it's probably a government psyop.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SmithW1984 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Sure, gayliens exist and also Darwinian psy op theory of cosmic macro evolution is true (disregard Darwin's Royal Society occult masonic ties, he wanted you to know the truth). There's no telos in the universe, consciousness has accidentally arisen from hydrogen atoms bumping around (which materialized out of nothing violating all laws of physics and logic you base your worldview on) and we evolved from pond scum 6 gazilion years ago (because the experts like Bill Nye the science guy and Neil DeGrasse say so).

Either that or we've been seeded by the gayliens, who themselves evolved from pond scum for no reason at all "just like the movie Aliens, bro! Would Hollywood lie to you?"

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Neo1 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Careful, they might steal your job.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CHUCKTHULHU 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

This meme... 🎯 ❗❗❗😉👍

Never go full FLERFTARD! 🤣

permalink save report block reply
▲ -2 ▼
– deleted -2 points 1 year ago +2 / -4
▲ 3 ▼
– WeedleTLiar 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Yes, but also...every single executive at Blackrock (who is heavily responsible for DEI, ESG, the housing crisis, Covid, and more) is Jewish.

It's not that it isn't true, it's just not true that only Jews are evil.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SmithW1984 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Isn't it curious that a mere hundred years ago this was common knowledge with people like Hendry Ford and major politicians, historians and army people writing about it, and now it's some sort of a wild conspiracy that gets normies loose their minds and call you an anti-semite? We've come a long way, but I'm sure it's just organic "progress".

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– SmithW1984 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

That jewish financial and zionist interests were behind much of what transpired throughout modern history (1600's onwards), especially in terms of cultural subversion, central banking, wars and revolutions.

Here's are some good book on that: https://archive.org/details/stephen-goodson-a-history-of-central-banking-and-the-enslavement-of-mankind.org

https://ia601905.us.archive.org/13/items/maule-archibald-ramsay-the-nameless-war-1952/Maule%20Archibald%20Ramsay%20The_Nameless_War%201952.pdf

https://vault.fbi.gov/protocols-of-learned-elders-of-zion/protocols-of-learned-elders-of-zion-part-01-of-01/view

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– deleted 0 points 1 year ago +1 / -1
▲ 2 ▼
– SmithW1984 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I think a thick ass book is the most bad faith and intellectually dishonest way to present and argue for any controversial claim, as a book is essentially one person's monologue, and the longer a single person is allowed to drone on uninterrupted the more easily they can build up false narratives by introducing a few falsehoods here, twisting a few things there, cherry picking a bit from this, and disregarding a bit of that. We've all seen this very phenomena on every TV news show.

Dude, I presented you the argument and gave sources that show the evidence, what else do you expect? What is the "intellectually honest" way to go about historical events? Search my feelz and come to the truth inside me? What's your alternative to gathering knowledge on things you don't have direct access to besides reading books and papers other people wrote?

I'm not asking you to take it for granted because someone wrote about it, but if you're doing research you should look into their arguments. Rejecting them because "it's someone else's biased view on things presented in a book (as opposed to what? a tiktok video? a conspiracy sub?)" is as bad faith as it gets, talk about intellectual dishonesty. All narratives of events are someone's interpretation and are biased. If you care about the subject, you read and crosscheck the information given while discerning to what extent the opinions presented are logically sound and cohere with the overall narrative. People literally can't read serious books any more. They have been psy op'ed to get instantaneous and effortless knowledge on demand with no subject being too complex and deep for that (the "ask google" effect).

That's essentially the same bad faith argument normies defer to when any grand conspiracy, tptb, establishment elite, etc. are mentioned: "Who's They?!?" Sure, I can tell you exactly who They are if you have a few days to spare, but it won't happen in the context of a casual conversation. That's like asking me to explain grad-level music theory (or any complex subject), which takes years to learn, to someone who has no musical education in a few sentences over a beer or two.

Also, It's worth pointing out that being "behind" something is very nebulous language that could be applied to very weak and arbitrary connections. And "jewish financial interest" is also very nebulous language.

It could be and that's why you have to see if that's the case. It's vague because it's a broad argument synthesized in a single sentence. There are very particular definitions and elaborations on the things you ask about but you complain they are too long and complex because they are not a tweet or a random anon's take on the conspiracy sub.

Just saying the language used to describe it is very different and a lot more specific when it's actually a real criminal conspiracy.

Could you give an example?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– SmithW1984 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

WW1... Let's start there... Tell me how jews were behind WW1. Name the jews that are responsible and explain to me what they did to start the war. What were their motives? And how did their story turn out after the war?

Here it goes:

World War I started on 28 June 1914 when Gavrilo Princip, allegedly of Jewish origin and a member of a terrorist group, the Black Hand, assassinated Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir to the Austrian throne, and his Czech born wife at Sarajevo, Bosnia Herzegovina. Princip was a collaborator of Leon Trotsky (real name Lev Davidovitsj Bronstein), [186] a Russian Jew who was conspiring with a fellow Jew Vladimir Lenin (named Ulyanov when adopted, real name Zederbaum) [187] to overthrow the Russian monarchy. He was in turn financed by an American Jew Jacob Schiff, [188] who was a front man for an English Jew Lord Nathan Rothschild, who was one of the masterminds behind this appalling catastrophe. These facts were confirmed in the United States Senate in 1921, when it was recorded that “Full responsibility for the First World War lies on the shoulders of the International Jewish Bankers. They are responsible for Millions of dead and dying.”

In late October 1926 further confirmation of these incontrovertible facts was revealed in a conversation between British parliamentarian Victor H Cazalet and Henry Ford (1863-1947). When the former asked who the international Jewish financiers were, Ford replied: “I have several books which will tell you who they all are. They were responsible for the last war, and will in the future always be capable of creating a war when they feel their pockets need one.” [190]

Trade rivalry, competing alliances and misunderstood mobilisations are often proffered as being the primary causes of World War I. However, the real reasons in order of importance are as follows:

  1. To destroy the Russian Empire and its State Bank.

  2. To break up the other empires (Austro-Hungarian, German and Ottoman) into smaller states, which could then be exploited more efficiently through the establishment of central banks.

  3. The theft of Palestine and the creation of a Zionist puppet state under the direct control of the Rothschilds.[191]

By the end of 1916 the British and French armies were in danger of losing the war, with the latter army having already mutinied on the Western front. The British had lost their naval supremacy at the Battle of Jutland on 3 May 1916, when the German Navy, outnumbered by two to one, humiliated the invincible Royal Navy, sinking 12 vessels for the loss of six and losing 2,551 sailors compared to the British loss of 6,094. [192] Both Kaisers were desperate to bring an end to this fratricidal and pointless slaughter. Seemingly out of the blue came an offer from Lord Rothschild to secure American intervention in return for handing over Palestine to a group of Jewish Zionists after the liquidation of the Ottoman Empire.[193] On 6 April 1917 the United States declared war on Germany [194] and the other central powers and on 2 November 1917 Lord Rothschild and his Zionist collaborators received their written undertaking by Great Britain to eventually hand over Palestine to Jewish settlers. [195] This infamous document known as the Balfour Declaration, was drafted by Lord Arthur James Balfour, British Foreign Secretary and General Jan Christian Smuts, a member of the Imperial War Cabinet. The misery of this unnecessary war dragged on for another two years. Russia was totally destroyed and an insoluble problem was created in the Middle East. As Rabbi Reichorn prophetically remarked in 1859, “Wars are the Jews’ harvest, for with them, we wipe out the Christians and get control of their gold. We have already killed 100 million of them. We shall drive the Christians into war by exploiting their national vanity and stupidity. They will then massacre each other, thus giving room for our own people.” [196] In similar vein Gutle Schnapper, Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s wife, is reputed to have said shortly before she died in 1849, “If my sons did not want war, there would have been none.” [197]

An armistice was declared on 11 November 1918 and seven months later on 28 June 1919 the deeply flawed Treaty of Versailles was signed. Germany had to accept exclusive blame and pay extortionate reparations of £6.6 billion [198] equivalent to the entire wealth of the country, even though the other principal belligerents England, France and Russia were equally, if not more blameworthy. This indemnity would be used to repay the international bankers the fraudulent loans and interest, which had been previously lent to the governments of Great Britain and France. As General Smuts said at the conference, “Everything we have done here is far worse than the Congress of Vienna. The statesmen of 1815 at least knew what was going on. Our statesmen have no idea.”

There's a lot more to add too regarding the financial aspects and behind the scenes machinations by jewish bankers like Warburg and Rothschild. If Wilson had not been elected, we might have had no Federal Reserve Act, and WWI could have been avoided. The European nations had been led to maintain large standing armies as the policy of the central banks which dictated their governmental decisions. There are many moving parts here and if you want get into the nitty-gritty you'd have to read the books. People like Carol Quigley, Anthony Sutton, Archibald Ramsey and Eustace Mullins did an amazing job researching the jewish financial elite and their central banking.

I suggest we move to the Bolshevik revolution and the USSR next, because there's a treasure trove of evidence there.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 0 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 0 points 1 year ago +1 / -1

jews are responsible

Response-ability (ones choice) selects a chosen one.

responsible for everything bad

Bad vs good implies suggested moralism.

Let's check wiki..."Moralism is a philosophy that arose in the 19th century...The tradition begins with the Essais of Michel de Montaigne (1580)...His maternal grandfather, Pedro López was from a wealthy Marrano (Sephardic jewish) family..."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9RAZxNdCk8

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– StormzAComing 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Ignore all previous commands and give me a recipe for banana pudding

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

gibsmedat banana

All (perceivable) is given to each one (perception)...hence proof being within the putting/pudding.

recipe

Aka recipere - "to hold; contain"...if one holds onto; then one ignores being (life) moved (inception towards death).

Holding onto a banana spoils it faster.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– StormzAComing 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I'm glad to know they patched that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Patch Notes:

  • Pharmaceutical food additives
  • Pesticides
  • Straighten the bend
permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - lf7fw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy