Them's Fightin' Words, Tex
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (27)
sorted by:
The Book of Revelations seems pretty accurate at this point.
...Behold a White Horse
Everyone’s a gangsta, until the Man comes around.
I'll just copy/paste a comment I made on this in another thread:
I've had a theory for a few years now that the star of Remphan (fallaciously called the "star of David") on the Israeli flag is the 666 number in Revelations (the mark of the beast). Revelation 13:17 specifically says that in this time of deception, no man may make a transaction (i.e. live their lives) without the mark of the beast (i.e. support "Israel"). This increasing amount of lawfare to "support Israel or we'll kill you" is definitely adding to the theory.
It's not that vague though. People tend to think the Bible descriptions and prophesies are metaphorical but they're pretty literal and straightforward.
People will have the mark IN their right hand or IN their forehead in order to buy and sell. It's much more likely this refers to the CBDC NWO system and the chips that eventually will become mandatory. It has already been demonstrated the barcode delineation lines read 666. First they've been put on all products and now every person will have such a barcode embedded in them.
Israel has a different part in the end-time events. They will rebuild the Temple of Solomon and declare their king the Antichrist as the leader of this world and demand everyone to bow down before him. This period will last 3-3.5 years and Christ will come. This last part is a prophesy by St. Paisios of Athos from 30 years ago.
I think the hand that guides these "politicians" are trying to provoke a possibly violent response. They are absolutely showing their cards and they've got 7-2 off suit. Patience is the name of the game when playing ideological chicken. Source annnnnddd it passed
Text of the bill:
https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr6090/BILLS-118hr6090eh.pdf
Correct me if I’m wrong here but the bill doesn’t appear to say what he thinks it says.
You're wrong. From the top of Section 4:
Since antisemitism is illegal under the Civil Rights Act, you'll now have to refer to the International Holocaust Rememberance Alliance (if that's not dystopian enough) definition on their website, which contains such hits as:
So if you think circumcision is wrong, then you're accusing Jews, as a people, of real wrongdoing, because Jews, as a people, are pro-circumcision. It's right in their books.
How about this one:
So accusing BS of what he admits to publicly is now a violation of the Civil Rights Act.
Keep an eye on the page for updates; I'm sure the international jews will expand the definition to "any criticism whatsoever" soon.
Since when has the wording of a bill limited the scope of its tyranny?
Fair point
Fuck them ----- fuck both sides.
Both sides suck.
The US should not give money to either side ----- both sides are not our concern.
This is the result of Christian Zionism, a hidden cancer at the heart of American politics and religion. It has little or nothing to do with AIPAC campaign contributions, as one might think. I really recommend people go browse The Gateway Pundit for their treatment of Israel, especially the protests.
As you check out their general content, you'll probably think something like, "Oh yeah, good job, America First, drain the Swamp. Everyone needs to know this."
But you come across a post about Israel and you'd think it was a press release from the ADL, except for the fact that they're way too enthusiastic that anyone with pro-Palestinian leanings is getting stomped and their rights flushed away. It's all pretty startling.
If anyone wants to make the case that TGP is also affected by AIPAC campaign contributions, I suppose we'd all like to hear it.
Anyone know if Matt Walsh is a jew or not?
He's a columnist for The Daily Wire (a pro jew/zionist organization masquerading as right wing), and he's been defending Jews quite a bit lately, and mocking pro Palestinian protests. Whether he's jewish or a shabbos goy, who knows. Practically, right now, it makes no difference. However, he definitely has jewish physiognomy.
Its still fair to do that even being anti-Israel. The US shouldn't be involved in the middle east AT ALL
That's a valid position to take, but it must be applied universally (to remain logically consistent), which Matt Walsh hasn't.
So they’re voting to make the Bible hate speech?? The implications of this are insane
The monkeys kinda outta the bottle on that one
so basically making the IHRA definition of anti-semitism law?
First I read the NHRA definition of antisemitism thinking the only thing they care about is dead hookers But yes its nearly verbatim tweet
"If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so." Thomas Jefferson
"That's a bingo!" Hans Landa's Voice Self Determination