Was the Baltimore "Bridge Collapse" an ATTACK on U.S. Infrastructure?
(eccentrik.substack.com)
Comments (9)
sorted by:
Prolly.
The latest r/conspiracy thread bout it being that 2 minutes are missing from the blackbox. Regardless if that is true or not.
The chances of it losing control, and then losing power in the crucial time they needed to avoid what happened, are pretty high. I proably have a better chance of winning the mega billions in the lotto.
If it was an attack, if it doesnt fit the narrative, it would never make the news I dont think. Stakes are to high?
The ship was heading towards the pylon before it lost power. The US transportation infrastructure is cut in half. Hazardous cargo cannot travel south, as that bridge was only one of two that allow hazardous cargo, i.e. Natural Gas, Oil and Nitrates. The captain is Ukrainian and the other 22 crew members are from India, and they did NOT have a Harbor Pilot on board piloting that ship. Somehow. There's your conspiracy.
How does a port with a hazardous cargo focus not have a mandatory harbor pilots and tugboats being used?
THAT is the question.
It also hit the support head on which is super suspicious. That said, the video loss could be explainable based upon the power being shut off. So, why was power off? They were trying to power cycle the system?
Frankly it is a surprise how few times incidents occur with the more and more poorly trained and lowered standards of all industries over the last 20 years. Speaking with cargo ship engineers, more things like this should happen more frequently and may start appearing more common.
That aside -- would ayh put it past merchants destroying old failing infrastructure with corrupt means like some one torching their business to collect insurance? Nope.
Ofcourse, to lower the possible escape routes when shit goes down.
There is video of the ship steering into the pillar, and 2 minutes of missing black box data from before the black out. The captain was from Ukraine. Why is this even a Question?
Another 4chan repost?