We got our information from decentralized sources that recognize the value of the marketplace of ideas, where shitty ones crumble under scrutiny and great ones remain.
And thus far, we have been right about the grand majority of things. But keep acting like a retard even after being wrong about virtually everything.
You think the FDA, an incredibly corrupt government organization, would post something bad about itself, on their own website? And you post this comment, on a conspiracy theory forum, as a means to refute?
I can't be the only one who notices the astounding number of commenters on this forum who blatantly don't believe in conspiracies.
In exchange for Plaintiffs’ agreement to dismiss all claims in this case,
Defendants agree to, within 21 calendar days:
1 Dr. Apter and Dr. Marik were dismissed from this case on February 5, 2024,
ECF No. 66, but join in this Stipulation of Dismissal.
Case 3:22-cv-00184 Document 74 Filed on 03/21/24 in TXSD Page 1 of 3
2
Retire FDA’s Consumer Update entitled, Why You Should Not Use
Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19, originally posted on March 5,
2021, and revised on September 7, 2021 (ECF No. 12, Ex. 1), while
retaining the right to post a revised Consumer Update.
Delete and not republish (1) FDA’s Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook
posts from August 21, 2021 (ECF No. 12, Exs. 4, 5), that read, “You are
not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.”; (2) FDA’s
Instagram post from August 21, 2021 (ECF No. 12, Ex. 6), that reads,
“You are not a horse. Stop it with the #ivermectin. It’s not authorized
for treating #COVID.”; (3) FDA’s Twitter post from April 26, 2022 (ECF
No. 12, Ex. 7), that reads, “Hold your horses, y’all. Ivermectin may be
trending, but it still isn’t authorized or approved to treat COVID-19.”;
and (4) all other social media posts on FDA accounts that link to Why
You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19 (ECF No. 12,
Ex. 1).
so, yet again , you were completely wrong and correctly mocked buy your obvious betters
correct :
Haha retard...no comment after being proven wrong.
I bet u were calling it horse paste just a few years back. Love seeing u shills get proven wrong
correct :
If you only accept evidence from government sources, you're going to have a bad time.
correct :
You think the FDA, an incredibly corrupt government organization, would post something bad about itself, on their own website? And you post this comment, on a conspiracy theory forum, as a means to refute?
it's still up. no source for OP's claim so until the tweet is gone, I call bullshit
wrong, fooled again :
vpnsurfer 13 hours ago +1 / -7
instead, trust a random tweet
having seen you post repeatedly, always wrong or laughingly foolish, I think I would agree with most people, in that, the only positive thing that could ever be said about your thinking is that - at least - you are consistent.
Our bad. Please trust us again.
instead, trust a random tweet.
We got our information from decentralized sources that recognize the value of the marketplace of ideas, where shitty ones crumble under scrutiny and great ones remain.
And thus far, we have been right about the grand majority of things. But keep acting like a retard even after being wrong about virtually everything.
So, any source on op's claim? if there was a court ruling, it should be public.
Ditching the evidence. How convenient.
https://twitter.com/US_FDA/status/1429050070243192839
it's still up. no source for OP's claim so until the tweet is gone, I call bullshit.
Got a link to the ruling?
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/fda-newsroom/press-announcements
Nothing on the FDA press release website.
...
...
...
You think the FDA, an incredibly corrupt government organization, would post something bad about itself, on their own website? And you post this comment, on a conspiracy theory forum, as a means to refute?
I can't be the only one who notices the astounding number of commenters on this forum who blatantly don't believe in conspiracies.
Nope. Not the only one.
so if there is no evidence about this ruling how do we know that it's real?
If you only accept evidence from government sources, you're going to have a bad time.
Don't bother replying to that shill retard. I thought everyone knew this already?
If it's a court ruling it's literally a government source that would have the info.
Haha retard...no comment after being proven wrong.
I bet u were calling it horse paste just a few years back. Love seeing u shills get proven wrong. 😅
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txsd.1875135/gov.uscourts.txsd.1875135.74.0.pdf
thanks!
so, yet again , you were completely wrong and correctly mocked buy your obvious betters
correct :
correct :
correct :
wrong (or, rather, fooled again) :
wrong, fooled again :
wrong, fooled again :
having seen you post repeatedly, always wrong or laughingly foolish, I think I would agree with most people, in that, the only positive thing that could ever be said about your thinking is that - at least - you are consistent.