Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

14
()
posted 2 years ago by DrLeaks 2 years ago by DrLeaks +14 / -0
36 comments share
36 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
▲ 6 ▼
– Fotismore 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

How unexpectedly helpful to US war interests.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CrazyRussian 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

Not at all. Looks like everybody in Middle East thoroughly trying to provoke US to use any force from their air carrier to finally get a legitimate reason to drown it. When even single US air carrier will be drowned that will mean end of US games with their "projecting power". Today Middle Easterners have more that enough firepower to drown few US air carriers without any problems. Hezbollah only have enough Onyx missiles to do that, not even talking about Iran and Pakistan joining this party.

Taking in account that TPTB does not allow nukes in that world war games for the crown of NWO leaders (otherwise, Israel would have been already fired all their nukes to some arab cities), things looks grim for US. Combination of incompetent and arrogant warmongers with that outdated idiocy of Navy with their air carriers junk looks bad.

The best US government could do is to remove all their Navy from Middle East as soon as possible to evade total and final humiliation. But something tell me they are too arrogant to even think about that. So the only hope US have is that muslims somehow fuck up with their attacks on US bases and Israel, so there will be no need to use air carrier group, so there will be no legitimate reason to attack them.

This will be irreversable end of US war interests, not something helpful.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– muhqtardtho 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

America's military strength is probably the only real thing about our nation. You're crazy if you think we'd lose anything in a head on war. That's literally why they had to revert to 5th column subversion. The military industrial complex is not just money laundering operation. Don't let all the pink haired news about our military fool you.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CrazyRussian 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

I don't think months of footage from real battlefield with tons of destroyed western overpriced crap have something to do with pink haired news.

Name me at least one model of any western weapon that proved its superiority in real battle against equal enemy.

IDK, for over a year I'm trying to get any modelname, and still get absolutely nothing. Fuck, nobody even can name a model of trench shovel that is on duty in US Special Forces.

As for US military strength, I'm shure US military will be able to show some level of resistance on US soil in conventional war, mostly from knowing territory better than enemy. But outside US they already done. Shitty weapons, shitty tactics, shitty comandment, shitty logistic, shitty solutions. When profits and/or ideology become more important than quality, everything turns into shit. We been there, done that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -7 ▼
– Ep0ch -7 points 2 years ago +2 / -9

I wish you'd use your Melon fucking head.

I wish we could then speak like adults because you've used your head.

What happens now? No, it's not USA war interests.

But there will be hard targets as a result. I'd expect. Without questions. Or we have very bad politics indeed.

Whose interests. Syria are factually a combination of other interests. None are particularly American. A buffer. That's just been attacked.

Sure you can presume conspiracy. But it is not. It's been attacked. Numerously now. Not to the extent of its presence there.

It can only respond. This time it must bring that fight forward, and roll the fucking dice. Which targets?

If it doesn't it get attacked everywhere else. It's soft.

I'd suggest blitz Damascus completely. Gone. Why not. It doesn't affect much. Another pawn. That board would have to consider, its next move.

If not I'd hit Iran's Coast. Or Lebanon.

It's not me

In either event there's the next move. But it will have to play this, it has consequences. Otherwise why are we citizens?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Michalusmichalus 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

No. They're saying this only helps the warmongers.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -3 ▼
– Ep0ch -3 points 2 years ago +2 / -5

No. It really doesn't, you don't understand the stakes.

You don't understand the war. The region. What was coming. What was arming.

It simply thought to dust it under the rug. It made narratives instead. Where it assumed the squidworld. Until it's a fog of war where it's still rolling those dice.

It was far too delayed in its actions. Deals, profit, narratives. It then reacts late in that game. That game was at for longer, arming, training, and reacting.

It would take a lot to explain far more is speculation. But it's a pattern. Easy to unravel.

Right now I wish it were simple, like the climate change, guys, okay there's the climate, and there needs to be cuts. Some little coven somewhere, agreed. Rats first. Squids next.

But this is war. War I support. It needs to make them heel and retreat. Instead of any other nuances.

You're caught up in the nuance. Leftists act. All they do. They deflect. While the other side don't. They wave their flag.

Who cares, is it contained. No. It's fire after fire. Engage. There's going to be a lot of shit. There was anyway to someday. It's caught up. Just hope nukes are limited to none.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Michalusmichalus 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Just to be clear. I understand what you have typed. I just disagree about war. Israel was having civil unrest. War is the traditional method of correcting the economy.

War is also ritual death magic.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 2 ▼
– Fotismore 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Talking like adults, eh? When you figure out how to write real sentences and communicate with a maximium of one insult per reply you can come talk to me about speaking like an adult.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– Ep0ch -1 points 2 years ago +1 / -2

You don't talk like an adult. You're a squid. You live in fantasy.

I asked you to run some scenarios here. Adults. Yes. Which target.

There will be a target. Come on. Otherwise captain shits his pants, stinks.

Which one? You have all that hardware. Pick one.

The region is fucking mental anyway. Next time it's Iraq bases. Then etc and etc.

Instead you've mouthed squids. All you fucking leftist snowflakes have done on here. You fool no one.

Damascus would be so easy. It's in war already. Others provoke larger war already occurring. But if you hit hard enough. It stops and thinks. Nope. Big fucking leftist squid debate. Then they attack anyway. Or escalates.

Sure the Russians. Or whatever whatever regardless regardlessly. Hitting squid brigades, nope, they split into more squids or some kind of squid powers.

Which one? It has to be one. You choose. Lebanon another, it will only get hit. What you're trying to contain is the region already, armed, and marching. Not by leftistism. Oh no. It's beyond any squid narrative now. No more free billions of bullshit squid recruitment. Do you flake. You would I mean read your comment. Aw it didn't hurt yet. Next time, promise, guys.

Whatever occurs will regardless, is the paradigm. It's not a matter of if anymore. The problem with Iran is obvious. It will likely flank. Problem with any are more squids.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Fotismore 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

I'll reply to your questions when you actually write a cohesive sentence. At least ask your supervisor to come over and help you write a coherent reply.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy