No. It really doesn't, you don't understand the stakes.
You don't understand the war. The region. What was coming. What was arming.
It simply thought to dust it under the rug. It made narratives instead. Where it assumed the squidworld. Until it's a fog of war where it's still rolling those dice.
It was far too delayed in its actions. Deals, profit, narratives. It then reacts late in that game. That game was at for longer, arming, training, and reacting.
It would take a lot to explain far more is speculation. But it's a pattern. Easy to unravel.
Right now I wish it were simple, like the climate change, guys, okay there's the climate, and there needs to be cuts. Some little coven somewhere, agreed. Rats first. Squids next.
But this is war. War I support. It needs to make them heel and retreat. Instead of any other nuances.
You're caught up in the nuance. Leftists act. All they do. They deflect. While the other side don't. They wave their flag.
Who cares, is it contained. No. It's fire after fire. Engage. There's going to be a lot of shit. There was anyway to someday. It's caught up. Just hope nukes are limited to none.
Just to be clear. I understand what you have typed. I just disagree about war. Israel was having civil unrest. War is the traditional method of correcting the economy.
No. It's the fucking region. A powder keg. Cut oil. Cut crop. Whoosh. Meanwhile arms are flowing like gravvy. Because there's competition. And there's resources.
There's a population exploding, multi millions, doubling, tripling, spilling out, easily propagated into opposition. Or some other assumption like Profit.
Talking like adults, eh? When you figure out how to write real sentences and communicate with a maximium of one insult per reply you can come talk to me about speaking like an adult.
You don't talk like an adult. You're a squid. You live in fantasy.
I asked you to run some scenarios here. Adults. Yes. Which target.
There will be a target. Come on. Otherwise captain shits his pants, stinks.
Which one? You have all that hardware. Pick one.
The region is fucking mental anyway. Next time it's Iraq bases. Then etc and etc.
Instead you've mouthed squids. All you fucking leftist snowflakes have done on here. You fool no one.
Damascus would be so easy. It's in war already. Others provoke larger war already occurring. But if you hit hard enough. It stops and thinks. Nope. Big fucking leftist squid debate. Then they attack anyway. Or escalates.
Sure the Russians. Or whatever whatever regardless regardlessly. Hitting squid brigades, nope, they split into more squids or some kind of squid powers.
Which one? It has to be one. You choose. Lebanon another, it will only get hit. What you're trying to contain is the region already, armed, and marching. Not by leftistism. Oh no. It's beyond any squid narrative now. No more free billions of bullshit squid recruitment. Do you flake. You would I mean read your comment. Aw it didn't hurt yet. Next time, promise, guys.
Whatever occurs will regardless, is the paradigm. It's not a matter of if anymore. The problem with Iran is obvious. It will likely flank. Problem with any are more squids.
I'll reply to your questions when you actually write a cohesive sentence. At least ask your supervisor to come over and help you write a coherent reply.
I wish you'd use your Melon fucking head.
I wish we could then speak like adults because you've used your head.
What happens now? No, it's not USA war interests.
But there will be hard targets as a result. I'd expect. Without questions. Or we have very bad politics indeed.
Whose interests. Syria are factually a combination of other interests. None are particularly American. A buffer. That's just been attacked.
Sure you can presume conspiracy. But it is not. It's been attacked. Numerously now. Not to the extent of its presence there.
It can only respond. This time it must bring that fight forward, and roll the fucking dice. Which targets?
If it doesn't it get attacked everywhere else. It's soft.
I'd suggest blitz Damascus completely. Gone. Why not. It doesn't affect much. Another pawn. That board would have to consider, its next move.
If not I'd hit Iran's Coast. Or Lebanon.
It's not me
In either event there's the next move. But it will have to play this, it has consequences. Otherwise why are we citizens?
No. They're saying this only helps the warmongers.
No. It really doesn't, you don't understand the stakes.
You don't understand the war. The region. What was coming. What was arming.
It simply thought to dust it under the rug. It made narratives instead. Where it assumed the squidworld. Until it's a fog of war where it's still rolling those dice.
It was far too delayed in its actions. Deals, profit, narratives. It then reacts late in that game. That game was at for longer, arming, training, and reacting.
It would take a lot to explain far more is speculation. But it's a pattern. Easy to unravel.
Right now I wish it were simple, like the climate change, guys, okay there's the climate, and there needs to be cuts. Some little coven somewhere, agreed. Rats first. Squids next.
But this is war. War I support. It needs to make them heel and retreat. Instead of any other nuances.
You're caught up in the nuance. Leftists act. All they do. They deflect. While the other side don't. They wave their flag.
Who cares, is it contained. No. It's fire after fire. Engage. There's going to be a lot of shit. There was anyway to someday. It's caught up. Just hope nukes are limited to none.
Just to be clear. I understand what you have typed. I just disagree about war. Israel was having civil unrest. War is the traditional method of correcting the economy.
War is also ritual death magic.
No. It's the fucking region. A powder keg. Cut oil. Cut crop. Whoosh. Meanwhile arms are flowing like gravvy. Because there's competition. And there's resources.
There's a population exploding, multi millions, doubling, tripling, spilling out, easily propagated into opposition. Or some other assumption like Profit.
Talking like adults, eh? When you figure out how to write real sentences and communicate with a maximium of one insult per reply you can come talk to me about speaking like an adult.
You don't talk like an adult. You're a squid. You live in fantasy.
I asked you to run some scenarios here. Adults. Yes. Which target.
There will be a target. Come on. Otherwise captain shits his pants, stinks.
Which one? You have all that hardware. Pick one.
The region is fucking mental anyway. Next time it's Iraq bases. Then etc and etc.
Instead you've mouthed squids. All you fucking leftist snowflakes have done on here. You fool no one.
Damascus would be so easy. It's in war already. Others provoke larger war already occurring. But if you hit hard enough. It stops and thinks. Nope. Big fucking leftist squid debate. Then they attack anyway. Or escalates.
Sure the Russians. Or whatever whatever regardless regardlessly. Hitting squid brigades, nope, they split into more squids or some kind of squid powers.
Which one? It has to be one. You choose. Lebanon another, it will only get hit. What you're trying to contain is the region already, armed, and marching. Not by leftistism. Oh no. It's beyond any squid narrative now. No more free billions of bullshit squid recruitment. Do you flake. You would I mean read your comment. Aw it didn't hurt yet. Next time, promise, guys.
Whatever occurs will regardless, is the paradigm. It's not a matter of if anymore. The problem with Iran is obvious. It will likely flank. Problem with any are more squids.
I'll reply to your questions when you actually write a cohesive sentence. At least ask your supervisor to come over and help you write a coherent reply.
You're dumber than give a shit. Fuck off. Gave you an opportunity twice. Instead you're another dumb squid, not an adult.
You think there this other world, squidworld.
Why can't it all be married. They are, look. But you've got no backbone. A billion, please?