Best case scenario, the vax roll out was incredibly sloppy.
I could definitely see the pro-vax crowd taking the "it was an emergency" stance, rather than the "Pfizer cut corners to profit from a non-issue" stance.
SV40 is like hek293 they use it as medium for replication. The fact that there's even any still around is an issue. We found our turbo cancer cause though.
This medical article says they had to remove SV-40 from hek293. Therefore your insane rage at my comment was uncalled for. So, to consider them together is not only perfectly reasonable... It's expected unless told otherwise. You'll notice it's not exactly an easy process.
BNT162b2 and mrNA-1273 are NOT live virus component vaccines "grown on growth medium", thus NO contamination from growth medium cell lines
Above mRNA vaccines are manufactured using programmed GMO-plasmids of E.Coli with a unique SV-40 promoter DNA sequence purposefully inserted. That is the source of the contamination.
This insertion of SV-40 promoter sequence was not an accident, but by design to help with manufacturing AND the intake of the mRNA (or that is the reasoning given, it could just as well be malicious gene editing attempt at mass scale)
The SV-40 promoter sequence (or certain 72 basepair sequence of it) enables the mRNA nuclear entry into the cell nucleus. This enables DNA integration (probabilistically)
The DNA integration has been demonstrated in BNT162b2 recipient cell samples via LINE1. No such reverse transcription has been found with so called "COVID-19 infected"
The SV-40 promoter sequence does not show up in any of the so called SARS-Cov-2 in-the-wild full virome sequence samples. That is, it only exists in the Pfizer and Moderna injections
The Pfizer (and perhaps Moderna) injections combine the remnants of the SV-40 DNA and the E.coli produced modRNA into triple-helix (yes, triple, not double) DNA:RNA combo, that is even more resistant to DNAse and RNAse protein degradation processes
all of the 3-6 was known by Pfizer , Moderna, FDA, CDC, EMA and possibly thousands of other parties. They all covered it up. On purpose. For over 2 years. It only came to surface due to painstaking independent replication by non-pharma funded independent biomedical researchers, who have now published and replicated the results (5 times).
I'm sure you knew all this, but you just made an error above, my bad.
Thanks for reading all the provided scientific research papers and their linked references and fully understanding what they meant.
How very excellent of you.
You truly are a scientific genius, I'm sorry I ever doubted you or was unpolite towards you.
This forum is populated by reading comprehension incapable morons, I'm so happy you are not one of them!
SV40 is a simple byproduct of cell cultures. every single cell culture uses VERO monkey cells. which are cells from a green river monkey. Viruses aren't real.
how about you read a book, if your still spouting shit about "mRNA" you anit there yet bud. Your basically playing semantics with stuff that doesn't even exist.
Ridiculous claim - The SV40 sequence (not a full virus, just a single gene sequence) was used in polio vaccines in the 50s and 60s and has been found in people with mesothelioma and osteosarcoma who never even received the original polio vaccines. The gene sequence is naturally occurring.
But you won't listen, Just keep trying to keep people scared.
Citation:
Paul A. Offit, Frank DeStefano, in Vaccines (Sixth Edition), 2013
Vaccines cause cancer
Simian virus 40 (SV40) was present in monkey kidney cells used to make the inactivated polio vaccine, live attenuated polio vaccine, and inactivated adenovirus vaccines in the late 1950s and early 1960s. Recently, investigators found SV40 DNA in biopsy specimens obtained from patients with certain unusual cancers (ie, mesothelioma, osteosarcoma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma), leading some to hypothesize a link between vaccination and the subsequent development of cancer.181 However, genetic remnants of SV40 were present in cancers of people who had or had not received contaminated polio vaccines; people with cancers who never received SV40-contaminated vaccines were found to have evidence for SV40 in their cancerous cells; and epidemiologic studies did not show an increased risk of cancers in people who received polio vaccine between 1955 and 1963 and people who did not receive these vaccines.181 Taken together, these findings do not support the hypothesis that the SV40 contained in polio vaccines administered before 1963 caused cancers.
We know that the vaxxes can shed spike proteins, is it not possible that these vaccines were shedding SV40?
The lack of link between those with polio vaccines and cancer rates is telling, although I question whether they took into account those who received the contaminated vaccines versus those who got clean shots. If the former group is much smaller than the larger group, the difference in cancer rates could be statistically insignificant on the whole, but significant specifically for this with SV40 in their shots.
They did spike the production (and thus, also sampled "vaccines") with the promoter sequence of SV-40.
That does not occur naturally in genetic injectable medication production.
The samples where the aforementioned sequence have been found (by 5 different labs now) are samples of BNT162b2/mRNA-1274 injectables (aka "vaccines").
Not human cell samples.
The SV-40 promoter sequence is integrated (by design) into the gene-edited plasmid used in the production of such mRNA injectables.
And the sequence also found itself (as DNA) within the actual end-use injectables themselves.
This has NOTHING to do with Polio vaccine contamination, but is a completely separate issue, which makes your argument beside the point, moot, irrelevant, out of context.
Further the official story for SV-40 contamination of polio vaccines is also 100% bunk cover story (and you can find the actual story in the book "Dr. Mary's Monkey How the Unsolved Murder of a Doctor, a Secret Laboratory in New Orleans and Cancer-Causing Monkey Viruses" by Edward T. Haslam (2007).
In case you want to educate yourself, instead of remaining ignorant.
Spoiler alert.
Best case scenario, the vax roll out was incredibly sloppy.
I could definitely see the pro-vax crowd taking the "it was an emergency" stance, rather than the "Pfizer cut corners to profit from a non-issue" stance.
There's no excuse. None.
Fuck everyone that pushed this shit. Even the doctors.
Take jab, return to monkee.
That sounds worse
And segment of that, the promoter sequence of SV-40.
Besides , this came out in early 2022.
Nuttin' has happened and nuttin will happen .
The agenda will continue and people will complain as they are being marched into camps.
SV40 is like hek293 they use it as medium for replication. The fact that there's even any still around is an issue. We found our turbo cancer cause though.
Not it's not. Learn the fucking basics.
https://rumble.com/v2ys9pw-plasmidgate-investigating-covid-vaccine-contamination.html
https://rumble.com/v2nl3z2-plasmidgate-a-whole-new-level-of-contamination-in-the-shots-explained-by-ma.html
If you want the deep dive, you need to listen a few hundred hours of KevinMcCairnPhD
Excuse me. You don't speak to me that way. Ever. If you'd like me to read something, link it. I'm not giving clicks to anything.
Learn the fucking basics of respect.
https://anandamide.substack.com/archive
https://osf.io/b9t7m/
https://osf.io/mjc97/
There's plenty more.
If you are really interested, you use yandex.com to search for the rest.
This medical article says they had to remove SV-40 from hek293. Therefore your insane rage at my comment was uncalled for. So, to consider them together is not only perfectly reasonable... It's expected unless told otherwise. You'll notice it's not exactly an easy process.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7397404/
It's not a growth medium, read the fucking papers, idiot. You are just displaying more of your ignorance. Please stop already.
Too stupid to know what a seed stock means. Too stupid to learn respect.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/sv40
https://clean-cells.com/activities/manufacturing/viral-seed-stocks-clean-cells/
BNT162b2 and mrNA-1273 are NOT live virus component vaccines "grown on growth medium", thus NO contamination from growth medium cell lines
Above mRNA vaccines are manufactured using programmed GMO-plasmids of E.Coli with a unique SV-40 promoter DNA sequence purposefully inserted. That is the source of the contamination.
This insertion of SV-40 promoter sequence was not an accident, but by design to help with manufacturing AND the intake of the mRNA (or that is the reasoning given, it could just as well be malicious gene editing attempt at mass scale)
The SV-40 promoter sequence (or certain 72 basepair sequence of it) enables the mRNA nuclear entry into the cell nucleus. This enables DNA integration (probabilistically)
The DNA integration has been demonstrated in BNT162b2 recipient cell samples via LINE1. No such reverse transcription has been found with so called "COVID-19 infected"
The SV-40 promoter sequence does not show up in any of the so called SARS-Cov-2 in-the-wild full virome sequence samples. That is, it only exists in the Pfizer and Moderna injections
The Pfizer (and perhaps Moderna) injections combine the remnants of the SV-40 DNA and the E.coli produced modRNA into triple-helix (yes, triple, not double) DNA:RNA combo, that is even more resistant to DNAse and RNAse protein degradation processes
all of the 3-6 was known by Pfizer , Moderna, FDA, CDC, EMA and possibly thousands of other parties. They all covered it up. On purpose. For over 2 years. It only came to surface due to painstaking independent replication by non-pharma funded independent biomedical researchers, who have now published and replicated the results (5 times).
I'm sure you knew all this, but you just made an error above, my bad.
Thanks for reading all the provided scientific research papers and their linked references and fully understanding what they meant.
How very excellent of you.
You truly are a scientific genius, I'm sorry I ever doubted you or was unpolite towards you.
This forum is populated by reading comprehension incapable morons, I'm so happy you are not one of them!
SV40 is a simple byproduct of cell cultures. every single cell culture uses VERO monkey cells. which are cells from a green river monkey. Viruses aren't real.
Lol! Read the Fucking papers and replications, before you spout off some Sam Bailey propaganda .
This has nothing to do with vero cell lines.
They out the sequence there on purpose as an mRNA (and perhaps also DNA cell integration promoter).
On purpose.
Didn't disclose it.
Tried to hide it.
Knew what it would do.
how about you read a book, if your still spouting shit about "mRNA" you anit there yet bud. Your basically playing semantics with stuff that doesn't even exist.
Ridiculous claim - The SV40 sequence (not a full virus, just a single gene sequence) was used in polio vaccines in the 50s and 60s and has been found in people with mesothelioma and osteosarcoma who never even received the original polio vaccines. The gene sequence is naturally occurring.
But you won't listen, Just keep trying to keep people scared.
Citation: Paul A. Offit, Frank DeStefano, in Vaccines (Sixth Edition), 2013
Vaccines cause cancer Simian virus 40 (SV40) was present in monkey kidney cells used to make the inactivated polio vaccine, live attenuated polio vaccine, and inactivated adenovirus vaccines in the late 1950s and early 1960s. Recently, investigators found SV40 DNA in biopsy specimens obtained from patients with certain unusual cancers (ie, mesothelioma, osteosarcoma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma), leading some to hypothesize a link between vaccination and the subsequent development of cancer.181 However, genetic remnants of SV40 were present in cancers of people who had or had not received contaminated polio vaccines; people with cancers who never received SV40-contaminated vaccines were found to have evidence for SV40 in their cancerous cells; and epidemiologic studies did not show an increased risk of cancers in people who received polio vaccine between 1955 and 1963 and people who did not receive these vaccines.181 Taken together, these findings do not support the hypothesis that the SV40 contained in polio vaccines administered before 1963 caused cancers.
Such a well thought out response. You sound stupid.
So, where did they come from I wonder?
We know that the vaxxes can shed spike proteins, is it not possible that these vaccines were shedding SV40?
The lack of link between those with polio vaccines and cancer rates is telling, although I question whether they took into account those who received the contaminated vaccines versus those who got clean shots. If the former group is much smaller than the larger group, the difference in cancer rates could be statistically insignificant on the whole, but significant specifically for this with SV40 in their shots.
They did spike the production (and thus, also sampled "vaccines") with the promoter sequence of SV-40.
That does not occur naturally in genetic injectable medication production.
The samples where the aforementioned sequence have been found (by 5 different labs now) are samples of BNT162b2/mRNA-1274 injectables (aka "vaccines").
Not human cell samples.
The SV-40 promoter sequence is integrated (by design) into the gene-edited plasmid used in the production of such mRNA injectables.
And the sequence also found itself (as DNA) within the actual end-use injectables themselves.
This has NOTHING to do with Polio vaccine contamination, but is a completely separate issue, which makes your argument beside the point, moot, irrelevant, out of context.
Further the official story for SV-40 contamination of polio vaccines is also 100% bunk cover story (and you can find the actual story in the book "Dr. Mary's Monkey How the Unsolved Murder of a Doctor, a Secret Laboratory in New Orleans and Cancer-Causing Monkey Viruses" by Edward T. Haslam (2007).
In case you want to educate yourself, instead of remaining ignorant.