BNT162b2 and mrNA-1273 are NOT live virus component vaccines "grown on growth medium", thus NO contamination from growth medium cell lines
Above mRNA vaccines are manufactured using programmed GMO-plasmids of E.Coli with a unique SV-40 promoter DNA sequence purposefully inserted. That is the source of the contamination.
This insertion of SV-40 promoter sequence was not an accident, but by design to help with manufacturing AND the intake of the mRNA (or that is the reasoning given, it could just as well be malicious gene editing attempt at mass scale)
The SV-40 promoter sequence (or certain 72 basepair sequence of it) enables the mRNA nuclear entry into the cell nucleus. This enables DNA integration (probabilistically)
The DNA integration has been demonstrated in BNT162b2 recipient cell samples via LINE1. No such reverse transcription has been found with so called "COVID-19 infected"
The SV-40 promoter sequence does not show up in any of the so called SARS-Cov-2 in-the-wild full virome sequence samples. That is, it only exists in the Pfizer and Moderna injections
The Pfizer (and perhaps Moderna) injections combine the remnants of the SV-40 DNA and the E.coli produced modRNA into triple-helix (yes, triple, not double) DNA:RNA combo, that is even more resistant to DNAse and RNAse protein degradation processes
all of the 3-6 was known by Pfizer , Moderna, FDA, CDC, EMA and possibly thousands of other parties. They all covered it up. On purpose. For over 2 years. It only came to surface due to painstaking independent replication by non-pharma funded independent biomedical researchers, who have now published and replicated the results (5 times).
I'm sure you knew all this, but you just made an error above, my bad.
Thanks for reading all the provided scientific research papers and their linked references and fully understanding what they meant.
How very excellent of you.
You truly are a scientific genius, I'm sorry I ever doubted you or was unpolite towards you.
This forum is populated by reading comprehension incapable morons, I'm so happy you are not one of them!
Too stupid to know what a seed stock means. Too stupid to learn respect.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/sv40
https://clean-cells.com/activities/manufacturing/viral-seed-stocks-clean-cells/
BNT162b2 and mrNA-1273 are NOT live virus component vaccines "grown on growth medium", thus NO contamination from growth medium cell lines
Above mRNA vaccines are manufactured using programmed GMO-plasmids of E.Coli with a unique SV-40 promoter DNA sequence purposefully inserted. That is the source of the contamination.
This insertion of SV-40 promoter sequence was not an accident, but by design to help with manufacturing AND the intake of the mRNA (or that is the reasoning given, it could just as well be malicious gene editing attempt at mass scale)
The SV-40 promoter sequence (or certain 72 basepair sequence of it) enables the mRNA nuclear entry into the cell nucleus. This enables DNA integration (probabilistically)
The DNA integration has been demonstrated in BNT162b2 recipient cell samples via LINE1. No such reverse transcription has been found with so called "COVID-19 infected"
The SV-40 promoter sequence does not show up in any of the so called SARS-Cov-2 in-the-wild full virome sequence samples. That is, it only exists in the Pfizer and Moderna injections
The Pfizer (and perhaps Moderna) injections combine the remnants of the SV-40 DNA and the E.coli produced modRNA into triple-helix (yes, triple, not double) DNA:RNA combo, that is even more resistant to DNAse and RNAse protein degradation processes
all of the 3-6 was known by Pfizer , Moderna, FDA, CDC, EMA and possibly thousands of other parties. They all covered it up. On purpose. For over 2 years. It only came to surface due to painstaking independent replication by non-pharma funded independent biomedical researchers, who have now published and replicated the results (5 times).
I'm sure you knew all this, but you just made an error above, my bad.
Thanks for reading all the provided scientific research papers and their linked references and fully understanding what they meant.
How very excellent of you.
You truly are a scientific genius, I'm sorry I ever doubted you or was unpolite towards you.
This forum is populated by reading comprehension incapable morons, I'm so happy you are not one of them!