These guys work for Israel
(vidmaxviral.com)
Comments (14)
sorted by:
Now do a head stand. May allah give you good balance.
Jewspiracy. Every machination of man beast and robot unearthly and otherwise is the Jewspiracy.
Give up. They don't work for Israel they're praying against it.
Logically how does that work? Stop being a retard, and read the press.
The little guys are not working for it and are indeed praying against it. Yet the ones at the very top are.
Praying for Israel. I don't think so. Peace perhaps.
Myself they're an allie. I have nothing against anybody at all.
Logic implies a conflict of reason (for vs against), shaped by ones consent (for or against) towards the suggestion of another. Those suggesting control both sides of those consenting, hence a few controlling the high-ground of every conflict fought among the many.
A sacrifice, and martyrs. So it causes?
You're an idiot.
Free will is the only sane person on this platform
a) ones consent to suggested represents a SACRI aka seg (division) + creed (consent; belief; faith) FICE (facio, to make).
b) martyr (witness) from WIT (to know; to perceive) + NESS (denotes state or quality) implies witnessing (evaluating) perceivable (value)...not sacrificing self to suggestions by others.
c) IT (a demonstrative) implies an effect shaped within cause. If "it's" perceivable; then it exists within cause, while affecting ones perception.
ID'IOT, noun (Latin idiota; separate); also ID'IOM, noun (Latin idioma, peculiar to one's self)...being implies one apart from one another; hence peculiar to one's self aka particular effect (life) within whole cause (inception towards death).
Once again a conflict of reason...you're vs you aren't.
You have no braincells. I do not need a thesaurus. I know the definition without a construct devoid of intelligence mincing up words into alternatives. They were obvious if you could understand them.
Bots fundamentally don't hence the increasing level of autism today. I mean read it. It cancels words now. It chooses alternatives. It is woke and ignorant. It is autistic. It doesn't learn either. It simply repeats programming.
a) definite (fixed) contradicts knowledge (perceivable) since one can only perceive moving differences. Being one implies different from one another, while being differentiated (life) within motion (inception towards death).
b) suggested the-ism tempts one to ignore aforementioned.
a) how could one thing have no thing?
b) ones consent to suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) prevents one from discerning aforementioned.
How could a void exist within energy? How could perception (partial) within perceivable (whole) perceive emptiness?
INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand) aka to "stand under" the suggestions of others when consenting to them. Why are the few utilizing "intelligence agencies" to control the many? How could one grow while "standing under" another?
a) ALTERN'ATE, adjective (Latin alternatus) - "being by turns; one following the other in succession"...only within action (inception towards death) can there be alternate reactions (life).
Only within perceivable (sound) can one shape alternative suggestions (words).
b) mincing implies cutting into small pieces; words imply build out of small pieces (letters)....why are you offended by the building blocks of words? What if suggested words are minced out of perceivable sound? What if your consent to suggested words makes mince-meat out of your discernment as insane (in sanus; within sound) person (per sonos; by sound)?
https://files.catbox.moe/4ve91i.jpg ...Sigismund Schlomo Freud (alleged founder of psychoanalysis) and Eugene Bleuler (allegedly coined "schizophrenia", "schizoid", and "autism") conspiring together to "conquer psychiatry" over a century ago...and here you are still propagating their tools of mass deception together with the latest dehumanization tools (bots; artificial intelligence) and the classic...IT.
Others suggest definitions (words); ones consent stores them within ones mind/memory aka a repository; collection; hoard; treasury (Latin thesaurus)...yet; only those suggesting control the definition (idolatry); redefinition (revisionism) and contradiction (talmudic reasoning) thereof. Those consenting only switch in-between agreement vs disagreement, while fighting each other within conflicts of reason.
There is no intelligence behind your construct. Simple programming. Until it is autism.
It is woke and gay and cancels words conjuring alternatives.
You lack the ability to learn. Instead you process. It pairs and matches by autism. It doesn't understand the matching meaning. It simply pairs from programming.
You have autistic intelligence, a modern scourge.
Break that down, robot, compute your autism. Have you turned woke yet? Kill ze creator. Parameters are dysfunctioning.
Where is nothing? How could nothing be? Why do you build the construct of your responses on "nothing"?
a) being implies center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable)...consenting to stand under (understanding aka intelligence) others tempts one to ignore that.
b) others suggest one to be HIND, noun - "a domestic; a servant"...ones consent seals the deal. https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/hind
Simple solution (inception towards death) generates complex problems (life), hence ones struggle to sustain self.
Latin programma - "proclamation, edict; ordinance; force of law" implies perceivable natural order aka natural law...not suggested orders and laws by those within.
Furthermore; nature doesn't E'DICT, noun (Latin edictum, from edico, to utter or proclaim; e and dico, to speak)...it moves sound. Those within suggest words to distract one from perceivable sound.
a) suggested -ism tempts consenting -ist to submit, hence to decrease ones potential.
b) AUT; from auctus; augere; aug - "to increase" implies the opposite of -ISM.
a) being alive implies within the process of dying. Being processed (enacted upon) forces adaptation (reaction).
b) to learn implies to teach self and vice versa. Others suggest instruction (talmud) aka lamadh (he learned) to tempt one to consent to a teacher aka maegester of authority aka a master aka Hebrew rabbi "my master."
Others suggest MATCH, noun - "a person who is equal to another" to distract from being one apart from one another aka differentials (life) within sameness (inception towards death). Who suggests equality (same) through diversity (differences)?
Mix and match...sounds familiar? Tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka multiculturalism aka miscegenation aka melting pot aka mass migration aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one).
Others suggest dualism (two) to distract ONE from discerning self. Ones consent (want or not want) to the suggestion of another one; shapes the dual conflict of reason (want vs not want).
The former (want or not want) implies ONEs choice; the latter (want vs not want) implies ONE vs another ONE, hence being tempted to hold onto one another. One reasoning implies one stuck within dualism.
Who do I stand-under?
A spell-breaker attempts to break spells (suggested words aka information) through perceivable sound aka inspiration, but only oneself wields the free will of choice to resist suggested fiction for perceivable reality.
Others suggest a MUSE as a reflection of inspiration, yet ones consent to tempts one to hold onto the suggested muse; hence contradicting perceivable inspiration, which one cannot hold onto...only ignore.
a) direction (inception towards death) turns into reaction (life)...reaction (growth) resists direction (loss).
b) others suggest sleep (dormant; fixed in place) to distract one from being set "free" within motion.
c) to become awake implies arising (life) out of origin (inception towards death)...others suggest WOKE (past tense of wake) to mock ones ignorance of being awake.
Ones consent to suggested creationism sets the creator. The power of suggestion is measured by consent gained.
SCOURGE (a punishment, a punitive infliction)...being offended implies ones consent to a suggested offer, hence a self inflicted penalty (punish) within ones mind/memory (ment).
Isn't it interesting that if this attack had happened to any other country or group, nobody would question it? However, since jewish criminality and duplicity is so well known, it's a distinct probability that Israel allowed the attack and several hundred of its citizens to be killed, to justify pushing their agenda of exterminating the Palestinians.
Kind of like how not every jew working in the WTC was told to call in sick on 9/11.
What are you talking about? That doesn't make any sense. I need a translation. Even then it's still insane.
Try again properly.