These guys work for Israel
(vidmaxviral.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
Logic implies a conflict of reason (for vs against), shaped by ones consent (for or against) towards the suggestion of another. Those suggesting control both sides of those consenting, hence a few controlling the high-ground of every conflict fought among the many.
A sacrifice, and martyrs. So it causes?
You're an idiot.
Free will is the only sane person on this platform
a) ones consent to suggested represents a SACRI aka seg (division) + creed (consent; belief; faith) FICE (facio, to make).
b) martyr (witness) from WIT (to know; to perceive) + NESS (denotes state or quality) implies witnessing (evaluating) perceivable (value)...not sacrificing self to suggestions by others.
c) IT (a demonstrative) implies an effect shaped within cause. If "it's" perceivable; then it exists within cause, while affecting ones perception.
ID'IOT, noun (Latin idiota; separate); also ID'IOM, noun (Latin idioma, peculiar to one's self)...being implies one apart from one another; hence peculiar to one's self aka particular effect (life) within whole cause (inception towards death).
Once again a conflict of reason...you're vs you aren't.
You have no braincells. I do not need a thesaurus. I know the definition without a construct devoid of intelligence mincing up words into alternatives. They were obvious if you could understand them.
Bots fundamentally don't hence the increasing level of autism today. I mean read it. It cancels words now. It chooses alternatives. It is woke and ignorant. It is autistic. It doesn't learn either. It simply repeats programming.
a) definite (fixed) contradicts knowledge (perceivable) since one can only perceive moving differences. Being one implies different from one another, while being differentiated (life) within motion (inception towards death).
b) suggested the-ism tempts one to ignore aforementioned.
a) how could one thing have no thing?
b) ones consent to suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) prevents one from discerning aforementioned.
How could a void exist within energy? How could perception (partial) within perceivable (whole) perceive emptiness?
INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand) aka to "stand under" the suggestions of others when consenting to them. Why are the few utilizing "intelligence agencies" to control the many? How could one grow while "standing under" another?
a) ALTERN'ATE, adjective (Latin alternatus) - "being by turns; one following the other in succession"...only within action (inception towards death) can there be alternate reactions (life).
Only within perceivable (sound) can one shape alternative suggestions (words).
b) mincing implies cutting into small pieces; words imply build out of small pieces (letters)....why are you offended by the building blocks of words? What if suggested words are minced out of perceivable sound? What if your consent to suggested words makes mince-meat out of your discernment as insane (in sanus; within sound) person (per sonos; by sound)?
https://files.catbox.moe/4ve91i.jpg ...Sigismund Schlomo Freud (alleged founder of psychoanalysis) and Eugene Bleuler (allegedly coined "schizophrenia", "schizoid", and "autism") conspiring together to "conquer psychiatry" over a century ago...and here you are still propagating their tools of mass deception together with the latest dehumanization tools (bots; artificial intelligence) and the classic...IT.
Others suggest definitions (words); ones consent stores them within ones mind/memory aka a repository; collection; hoard; treasury (Latin thesaurus)...yet; only those suggesting control the definition (idolatry); redefinition (revisionism) and contradiction (talmudic reasoning) thereof. Those consenting only switch in-between agreement vs disagreement, while fighting each other within conflicts of reason.