These guys work for Israel
(vidmaxviral.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
Where is nothing? How could nothing be? Why do you build the construct of your responses on "nothing"?
a) being implies center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable)...consenting to stand under (understanding aka intelligence) others tempts one to ignore that.
b) others suggest one to be HIND, noun - "a domestic; a servant"...ones consent seals the deal. https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/hind
Simple solution (inception towards death) generates complex problems (life), hence ones struggle to sustain self.
Latin programma - "proclamation, edict; ordinance; force of law" implies perceivable natural order aka natural law...not suggested orders and laws by those within.
Furthermore; nature doesn't E'DICT, noun (Latin edictum, from edico, to utter or proclaim; e and dico, to speak)...it moves sound. Those within suggest words to distract one from perceivable sound.
a) suggested -ism tempts consenting -ist to submit, hence to decrease ones potential.
b) AUT; from auctus; augere; aug - "to increase" implies the opposite of -ISM.
a) being alive implies within the process of dying. Being processed (enacted upon) forces adaptation (reaction).
b) to learn implies to teach self and vice versa. Others suggest instruction (talmud) aka lamadh (he learned) to tempt one to consent to a teacher aka maegester of authority aka a master aka Hebrew rabbi "my master."
Others suggest MATCH, noun - "a person who is equal to another" to distract from being one apart from one another aka differentials (life) within sameness (inception towards death). Who suggests equality (same) through diversity (differences)?
Mix and match...sounds familiar? Tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka multiculturalism aka miscegenation aka melting pot aka mass migration aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one).
Others suggest dualism (two) to distract ONE from discerning self. Ones consent (want or not want) to the suggestion of another one; shapes the dual conflict of reason (want vs not want).
The former (want or not want) implies ONEs choice; the latter (want vs not want) implies ONE vs another ONE, hence being tempted to hold onto one another. One reasoning implies one stuck within dualism.
Who do I stand-under?
A spell-breaker attempts to break spells (suggested words aka information) through perceivable sound aka inspiration, but only oneself wields the free will of choice to resist suggested fiction for perceivable reality.
Others suggest a MUSE as a reflection of inspiration, yet ones consent to tempts one to hold onto the suggested muse; hence contradicting perceivable inspiration, which one cannot hold onto...only ignore.
a) direction (inception towards death) turns into reaction (life)...reaction (growth) resists direction (loss).
b) others suggest sleep (dormant; fixed in place) to distract one from being set "free" within motion.
c) to become awake implies arising (life) out of origin (inception towards death)...others suggest WOKE (past tense of wake) to mock ones ignorance of being awake.
Ones consent to suggested creationism sets the creator. The power of suggestion is measured by consent gained.
SCOURGE (a punishment, a punitive infliction)...being offended implies ones consent to a suggested offer, hence a self inflicted penalty (punish) within ones mind/memory (ment).