It seems you have intentionally misused the word "Murder" to create a discussion.
The killing of another person without justification or excuse, especially the crime of killing a person with malice aforethought or with recklessness manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life.
As it is not murder at all.
Food for thought. Devout Quakers still use the term "sacrifice" when preparing their meals of meat. To acknowledge what they are doing. As the animal's life is being sacrificed for us.
Edit: For those who may be confused by this post, and what is currently happening. OP, has mistakenly replied to this thread, assuming that I replied to this one here.
Do you realize, that you have just admitted to not caring for the truth? And have coupled that with a baseless accusation? Of course you are aware of this. As you argue in bad faith do you not?
a) the only weapon (instrument of offense/defense) for bio (life) is ones free will of choice aka "weapon of choice". Others suggest weapons to tempt one to harm self and others when consenting by free will of choice.
b) nature pushes (motion) to the limit (momentum) to pass the point of no return (choice).
a) sacrifice aka SACRED (ones creed to another's curse) + FACIO (to make)
b) CREED implies ones consent to want or not want another's suggestion; while CURSE implies uttering imprecations towards ones affirmation (want) or denial (not want).
c) suggestion invokes (imprecates) ones ignorance of perceivable for suggested.
Bonus: consider the difference between cursive (running forwards) and print (pressing forwards)...
food for thought
Perceivable inspiration implies contemplation (food for thought); while suggested information implies constipation (fast food).
Murder is lying in wait and shedding innocent blood. Killing coyotes just because is murder. Killing for food is permitted. Using every last bit of an animal you kill is responsible and respectful of that life. Death is a fact of life. Death is game over, not right or wrong, just a fact. Conditions of the death is where right and wrong are judged.
YES.
imagine if aliens were to kill us like animals to 'control the population'.
for fucks sake people are so fucking clueless. we are NOT animals. there are laws of morality that apply to us. read my other comment, go through, and see for yourself
Others suggest death as a fact to distract one from living within the process of dying. Loss (inception towards death) generates growth (life); growth struggles to sustain self within loss.
FACT (an effect produced; that which comes to pass)...life represents the effect produces within cause aka that which comes to pass from inception towards death. Others suggest "death" as the inversion of "life", while using factionalism as the temptation for ones consent.
Death is game over
GAME, noun - "jest; opposed to earnest"...what if ongoing to temporary (inception); temporary within ongoing (life) and temporary to ongoing (death) implies ones earnest duty within perceivable, as opposed to suggested games by others?
The hue (color) of man implies spectrum within animation, hence hue-man being a species within anima. Others suggest the labels "human" and "animal" to distract from discerning this.
Furthermore...HU'MAN, adjective (Latin humanus; Heb. form, species) can only exist within AN'IMAL, noun (Latin anima, air, breath, soul).
beasts of burden?
BE (being) AST (astute; discerning) implies ones burden of self discernment...ignoring this for taking on the suggestions by others MARKS one.
the sheeple
Instead of just focusing on the following sheeple; also consider the trailblazing ram aka the aries (aryan).
should we feel remorse
a) "we" implies ones (singular) consent to suggested pluralism, hence ones guilt (remorse) by willing association with another.
b) remorse (Latin remordeo) implies German MORD (murder; killing), hence the association of murder and RE (respond to) MORDEO (murdering).
Are they wrong?
Many reasoning (right vs wrong) over suggestions by few; permits few to domesticate many within the confines of reason/logic.
natural selection
a) TION (action) NATURE (to produce) SELEC (to react) ...nature implies action (inception towards death) producing reactions (life).
b) Ones consent to the suggested choices by others selects them as ones ELITE (selection; choice) aka as chosen ones.
Yeah search for remote viewing moksha . There was a reddit thread on it.
A group of remote viewers independently viewed it and its a soul trap. Lots of info there and once you learn that, there is information somewhere about how to escape the soul trap.
Although, personally I believe that Jesus or whoever the Christ figure was, pierced the veil that kept us trapped and allowed us a way out of the trap.
Since time doesn't really exist, his presence at one time meant access to the escape for peoples at all times.
and this debate over the word 'murder' lmao. murder is killing. Jesus said to have mercy and most christians have 0 mercy when they kill a lamb, because hey it's not murder, it's sacrifice, yeah I still take a knife and cut its throat with 0 mercy but now it's a sacred ritual because I'm hungry so the rest of the animals can go fuck themselves.
WATCH THE FUCKING VIDEO THAT IS LINKED. then decide. don't be a hypocryte and take all sides in consideration then decide. truth come last, take off your biases
A wrong is an action that harms another sentient being. So of course it is wrong to kill an animal. And no, we do not need to eat meat in the day of modern agriculture and food distribution. Just ask any vegan if they need meat. I'm not saying immediately switch to veganism because that will cause health issues. But you can certainly adjust to a vegetarian and ultimately vegan lifestyle over time.
The William Cooper quote is exactly the justification that the psychopaths running the show use for the harm they cause the general population. They don't see the average person as being truly conscious, so they believe there aren't any karmic repercussions for violating their rights.
fuck veganism.
first go pisco-vegetarian and one can stay there for 7-10 years. Vegans are always weak and it's too much, vegetarianism is better. but people should raise their chickens not have them in in cages treated like objects.
I do agree with natural law, good to see more people who did their homework.
It seems you have intentionally misused the word "Murder" to create a discussion.
As it is not murder at all.
Food for thought. Devout Quakers still use the term "sacrifice" when preparing their meals of meat. To acknowledge what they are doing. As the animal's life is being sacrificed for us.
Sorry, you're going blind and you're using your remaining time to argue on the internet?
Wow...
You are showing bad faith in your statements and instances:
These are the Questions you are refusing to answer.
What is an executive order?
What was Executive Order 13962?
Were those orders followed?
Edit: For those who may be confused by this post, and what is currently happening. OP, has mistakenly replied to this thread, assuming that I replied to this one here.
Do you realize, that you have just admitted to not caring for the truth? And have coupled that with a baseless accusation? Of course you are aware of this. As you argue in bad faith do you not?
.ㅤ̍ͭ̃ͭ
Yeah bro. Don't you realize your nice, hardworking coworker is actively participating in checks notes.....genocide?
It's not worth the time engaging with these people. Either hate has consumed them or they are paid to be here.
a) the only weapon (instrument of offense/defense) for bio (life) is ones free will of choice aka "weapon of choice". Others suggest weapons to tempt one to harm self and others when consenting by free will of choice.
b) nature pushes (motion) to the limit (momentum) to pass the point of no return (choice).
Wow that is really interesting about the quakers. And a very... respectful way to live. I will try to incorporate that thought into my life. Thanks 😃
a) sacrifice aka SACRED (ones creed to another's curse) + FACIO (to make)
b) CREED implies ones consent to want or not want another's suggestion; while CURSE implies uttering imprecations towards ones affirmation (want) or denial (not want).
c) suggestion invokes (imprecates) ones ignorance of perceivable for suggested.
Bonus: consider the difference between cursive (running forwards) and print (pressing forwards)...
Perceivable inspiration implies contemplation (food for thought); while suggested information implies constipation (fast food).
Murder is lying in wait and shedding innocent blood. Killing coyotes just because is murder. Killing for food is permitted. Using every last bit of an animal you kill is responsible and respectful of that life. Death is a fact of life. Death is game over, not right or wrong, just a fact. Conditions of the death is where right and wrong are judged.
YES. imagine if aliens were to kill us like animals to 'control the population'. for fucks sake people are so fucking clueless. we are NOT animals. there are laws of morality that apply to us. read my other comment, go through, and see for yourself
Others suggest death as a fact to distract one from living within the process of dying. Loss (inception towards death) generates growth (life); growth struggles to sustain self within loss.
FACT (an effect produced; that which comes to pass)...life represents the effect produces within cause aka that which comes to pass from inception towards death. Others suggest "death" as the inversion of "life", while using factionalism as the temptation for ones consent.
GAME, noun - "jest; opposed to earnest"...what if ongoing to temporary (inception); temporary within ongoing (life) and temporary to ongoing (death) implies ones earnest duty within perceivable, as opposed to suggested games by others?
Blunt or remove the ability for people to engage their intelligence, then complain that they will not "use" their intelligence.
Sounds about right.
I think we know who the "animals" really are.
It's all animals in the menagerie.
It's only murder to kill those who benefit the survival of your own race.
Sounds like you could use some Dostoyevski.
The hue (color) of man implies spectrum within animation, hence hue-man being a species within anima. Others suggest the labels "human" and "animal" to distract from discerning this.
Furthermore...HU'MAN, adjective (Latin humanus; Heb. form, species) can only exist within AN'IMAL, noun (Latin anima, air, breath, soul).
BE (being) AST (astute; discerning) implies ones burden of self discernment...ignoring this for taking on the suggestions by others MARKS one.
Instead of just focusing on the following sheeple; also consider the trailblazing ram aka the aries (aryan).
a) "we" implies ones (singular) consent to suggested pluralism, hence ones guilt (remorse) by willing association with another.
b) remorse (Latin remordeo) implies German MORD (murder; killing), hence the association of murder and RE (respond to) MORDEO (murdering).
Many reasoning (right vs wrong) over suggestions by few; permits few to domesticate many within the confines of reason/logic.
a) TION (action) NATURE (to produce) SELEC (to react) ...nature implies action (inception towards death) producing reactions (life).
b) Ones consent to the suggested choices by others selects them as ones ELITE (selection; choice) aka as chosen ones.
Yeah search for remote viewing moksha . There was a reddit thread on it. A group of remote viewers independently viewed it and its a soul trap. Lots of info there and once you learn that, there is information somewhere about how to escape the soul trap.
Although, personally I believe that Jesus or whoever the Christ figure was, pierced the veil that kept us trapped and allowed us a way out of the trap.
Since time doesn't really exist, his presence at one time meant access to the escape for peoples at all times.
KILLING ANIMALS IS IMMORAL. downvote only after you watch this
https://odysee.com/@Soren:71/Mark-Passio---'Meat-Eating-is-a-Dogmatic-Religion':4
and a good documentary here: https://odysee.com/@Soren:71/Earthlings:440
plus more resources.
and this debate over the word 'murder' lmao. murder is killing. Jesus said to have mercy and most christians have 0 mercy when they kill a lamb, because hey it's not murder, it's sacrifice, yeah I still take a knife and cut its throat with 0 mercy but now it's a sacred ritual because I'm hungry so the rest of the animals can go fuck themselves.
WATCH THE FUCKING VIDEO THAT IS LINKED. then decide. don't be a hypocryte and take all sides in consideration then decide. truth come last, take off your biases
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/17r9fty5vd/
Prove me wrong, satanic cuck.
A wrong is an action that harms another sentient being. So of course it is wrong to kill an animal. And no, we do not need to eat meat in the day of modern agriculture and food distribution. Just ask any vegan if they need meat. I'm not saying immediately switch to veganism because that will cause health issues. But you can certainly adjust to a vegetarian and ultimately vegan lifestyle over time.
The William Cooper quote is exactly the justification that the psychopaths running the show use for the harm they cause the general population. They don't see the average person as being truly conscious, so they believe there aren't any karmic repercussions for violating their rights.
Veganism actually causes more harm to animals and the environment
fuck veganism. first go pisco-vegetarian and one can stay there for 7-10 years. Vegans are always weak and it's too much, vegetarianism is better. but people should raise their chickens not have them in in cages treated like objects.
I do agree with natural law, good to see more people who did their homework.
https://odysee.com/@Soren:71/Mark-Passio---'Meat-Eating-is-a-Dogmatic-Religion':4