It seems you have intentionally misused the word "Murder" to create a discussion.
The killing of another person without justification or excuse, especially the crime of killing a person with malice aforethought or with recklessness manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life.
As it is not murder at all.
Food for thought. Devout Quakers still use the term "sacrifice" when preparing their meals of meat. To acknowledge what they are doing. As the animal's life is being sacrificed for us.
Edit: For those who may be confused by this post, and what is currently happening. OP, has mistakenly replied to this thread, assuming that I replied to this one here.
Do you realize, that you have just admitted to not caring for the truth? And have coupled that with a baseless accusation? Of course you are aware of this. As you argue in bad faith do you not?
a) the only weapon (instrument of offense/defense) for bio (life) is ones free will of choice aka "weapon of choice". Others suggest weapons to tempt one to harm self and others when consenting by free will of choice.
b) nature pushes (motion) to the limit (momentum) to pass the point of no return (choice).
a) sacrifice aka SACRED (ones creed to another's curse) + FACIO (to make)
b) CREED implies ones consent to want or not want another's suggestion; while CURSE implies uttering imprecations towards ones affirmation (want) or denial (not want).
c) suggestion invokes (imprecates) ones ignorance of perceivable for suggested.
Bonus: consider the difference between cursive (running forwards) and print (pressing forwards)...
food for thought
Perceivable inspiration implies contemplation (food for thought); while suggested information implies constipation (fast food).
It seems you have intentionally misused the word "Murder" to create a discussion.
As it is not murder at all.
Food for thought. Devout Quakers still use the term "sacrifice" when preparing their meals of meat. To acknowledge what they are doing. As the animal's life is being sacrificed for us.
Sorry, you're going blind and you're using your remaining time to argue on the internet?
Wow...
You are showing bad faith in your statements and instances:
These are the Questions you are refusing to answer.
What is an executive order?
What was Executive Order 13962?
Were those orders followed?
Edit: For those who may be confused by this post, and what is currently happening. OP, has mistakenly replied to this thread, assuming that I replied to this one here.
Do you realize, that you have just admitted to not caring for the truth? And have coupled that with a baseless accusation? Of course you are aware of this. As you argue in bad faith do you not?
.ㅤ̍ͭ̃ͭ
a) the only weapon (instrument of offense/defense) for bio (life) is ones free will of choice aka "weapon of choice". Others suggest weapons to tempt one to harm self and others when consenting by free will of choice.
b) nature pushes (motion) to the limit (momentum) to pass the point of no return (choice).
Wow that is really interesting about the quakers. And a very... respectful way to live. I will try to incorporate that thought into my life. Thanks 😃
a) sacrifice aka SACRED (ones creed to another's curse) + FACIO (to make)
b) CREED implies ones consent to want or not want another's suggestion; while CURSE implies uttering imprecations towards ones affirmation (want) or denial (not want).
c) suggestion invokes (imprecates) ones ignorance of perceivable for suggested.
Bonus: consider the difference between cursive (running forwards) and print (pressing forwards)...
Perceivable inspiration implies contemplation (food for thought); while suggested information implies constipation (fast food).