In the world of Ideation (Heaven) - Q as 17 is Divine Inspiration.

Does this mean Q is a man?

Micro to macro, Yes in one way, and No in another.

If someone represents or expresses divine inspiration, then one IS Q.

If all did, then why would there be a need for a literal savior named Q?

Find the decode for 'chrism' and 'the christ'.

Something Deep: 'Jesus Christ, Sun of God: Ancient Cosmology and Early Christian Symbolism' pdf online

That book was “channeled” and it has the same story beats that any other false teachings have when you go through it. The Bible tells you what to look out for when discerning what is from God and what is from the devil and his angels. Quit asking some chatbot for information when you can go read it for yourself.

Hard pass, heretic.

In answer to some or your questions & statements newfunturistic

I have been a reader of the Urantia Book since 1976.

I was raised Catholic and became an atheist in collage. Found the book in 1976 and read it at the recommendation of a friend. It took me six months to finish it from cover to cover. I don’t believe it is BS.

The Urantia book was not channeled. The process had it’s beginnings in about 1919. Part I-II were completed in 1934. Part III-IV were completed in 1935.

The Celestial authors are clearly listed in the table of content:

PART I The Central and Superuniverses Nr. · Paper · Author · Page 001 · The Universal Father · Divine Counselor · 21 002 · The Nature of God · Divine Counselor · 33 … The humans who witnessed the contact (“The Contact Commission” - two of whom were MD’s). One of these doctors was active in debunking “Frauds, Spiritualist, and Psychic” which were “the rage” in the 1920s.

A Melchizedek is an order of divine sons, one of whom, incarnated (took human form) about 2000 years before the incarnation of Jesus of Nazareth (another divine son). His mission was to keep the monotheistic idea of God alive in the minds of men. And Yes - The Jewish priests edited the historical records during the Babylonian captivity.

“The teaching of Melchizedek was full and replete, but the records of these days seemed impossible and fantastic to the later Hebrew priests, although many had some understanding of these transactions, at least up to the times of the en masse editing of the Old Testament records in Babylon.” 93:9.7 (1023.4) “What the Old Testament records describe as conversations between Abraham and God were in reality conferences between Abraham and Melchizedek. Later scribes regarded the term Melchizedek as synonymous with God. The record of so many contacts of Abraham and Sarah with “the angel of the Lord” refers to their numerous visits with Melchizedek. …The Hebrew scribes therefore destroyed every record of these momentous times which they could find, preserving only the narrative of the meeting of Abraham and Melchizedek after the battle of Siddim, which they deemed reflected great honor upon Abraham.” 93:9.10 (1024.1) “And thus, in losing sight of Melchizedek, they also lost sight of the teaching of this emergency Son regarding the spiritual mission of the promised bestowal Son; lost sight of the nature of this mission so fully and completely that very few of their progeny were able or willing to recognize and receive Jesus when he appeared on earth and in the flesh as Machiventa Melchizedek had foretold.”
Neither Jesus or Melchizedek shagged any female. One of the incarnation mandates is that a divine son may not procreate offspring.

I know ordinary people, Catholic priests, Protestant ministers, and PHD Scientists, who are readers of the Urantia Book. Here is what Dr. Kary Mulliis (the inventor of the widely misused PCR Test) said:

https://www.karymullis.com/urantia.html

The Urantia Book The Urantia Book was purportedly written by extraterrestrials and published in 1955. It has been freely available on the internet since 2001. Several scientific developments, unexpected in 1955, reported in 2005 in Science and Nature, and referenced below, were somehow, described rather precisely already in the Urantia Book. I have documented three cases here, but there are many contemporary scientific discoveries which were first posited as far as I can tell, in this rather large tome. There is much in here, the truth of which cannot be judged from the apparent truth of these several instances. The book claims a large number of authors. Much of it would be considered "politically incorrect" and might infuriate some people. I suggest that you not be shooting at the messenger; I am just reporting what I have observed. Striking Coincidences Between The Urantia Book (Copyright 1955)three articles in Science: 309 (2005), and one in Nature, (2005) Urantia Book "4,500,000,000 years ago the enormous Angona system began its approach to the neighborhood of this solitary sun. The center of this great system was a dark giant of space, solid, highly charged, and possessing tremendous gravity pull." "As the Angona system drew nearer, the solar extrusions grew larger and larger; more and more matter was drawn from the sun to become independent circulating bodies in surrounding space. This situation developed for about five hundred thousand years until Angona made its closest approach to the sun; whereupon the sun, in conjunction with one of its periodic internal convulsions, experienced a partial disruption; from opposite sides and simultaneously, enormous volumes of matter were disgorged. From the Angona side there was drawn out a vast column of solar gases, rather pointed at both ends and markedly bulging at the center, which became permanently detached from the immediate gravity control of the sun." (Urantia paper 57: The Origin of Urantia) Science "The Moon and all the terrestrial planets were resurfaced during a period of intense impact cratering that occurred between the time of their accretion, 4.5 billion years ago (Ga), and 3.85 Ga" "The mechanism responsible for ejecting asteroids from the main asteroid belt and into terrestrial planet-crossing orbits during the LHB had to be unique to the early solar system, because there is no evidence for any event of similar magnitude in the inner planets' cratering history since then. Furthermore, that mechanism had to be one that ejected asteroids from the main belt in a size-independent manner, preserving the MBA size distribution in the inner planet impactor population. This precludes size-dependent nongravitational transport processes, such as the Yarkovsky effect, and instead implicates a dynamical process, such as sweeping gravitational resonances, that is largely insensitive to asteroid mass." (Science: The Origin of Planetary Impactors in the Inner Solar System) Science Vol 309:1847 (2005).   The long-favored paradigm for the development of continental crust is one of progressive growth beginning at 4 billion years ago (Ga). To test this hypothesis, we measured initial 176Hf/177Hf values of 4.01- to 4.37-Ga detrital zircons from Jack Hills, Western Australia. Hf (deviations of 176Hf/177Hf from bulk Earth in parts per 104) values show large positive and negative deviations from those of the bulk Earth. Negative values indicate the development of a Lu/Hf reservoir that is consistent with the formation of continental crust (Lu/Hf 0.01), perhaps as early as 4.5 Ga. Positive Hf deviations require early and likely widespread depletion of the upper mantle. These results support the view that continental crust had formed by 4.4 to 4.5 Ga and was rapidly recycled into the mantle. (Science: Heterogeneous Hadean Hafnium: Evidence of Continental Crust at 4.4 to 4.5 Ga) Science 310: 1947 (2005). (Science: A Tale of Early Earth Told in Zircons) Science 310:1914 (2005)   The Urantia Book "800,000 years ago game was abundant; many species of deer, as well as elephants and hippopotamuses, roamed over Europe. Cattle were plentiful; horses and wolves were everywhere. The Neanderthalers were great hunters, and the tribes in France were the first to adopt the practice of giving the most successful hunters the choice of women for wives." "The reindeer was highly useful to these Neanderthaler peoples, serving as food, clothing, and for tools. Since they made various uses of the horns and bones. They had little culture, but they generally improved the work in flint until it almost reached the levels of the days of Andon (a reference to a stage of civilization described earlier in the book).Large flints attached to wooden handles came back into use and served as axes and picks." (Urantia Paper 64: The Neanderthal races) Nature A recent article in Nature, "The earliest record of human activity in northern Europe" Parfitt, S. A., et al, 2005:1008-1012, (Nature 438:1008 (2005). "Life on the Costa del Cromer" Nature 438: 921 (2005);described flint artifacts from the Cromer Forest-bed Formation at Pakefield, Suffolk, UK, from an interglacial sequence yielding a diverse range of plant and animal fossils. Event and lithostratiographic, paleomagnetism, amino acid geochronolgy and biostratigraphy indicate that the artifacts date to the early part of the Brunhes Chron (about 700 kyr ago) and thus represent the earliest unequivocal presence [of humans] north of the Alps. "Until now, the earliest uncontested artefacts from northern Europe were much younger, suggesting that humans were unable to colonize northern latitutdes until about 500kyr ago." "The artifacts, all in vary sharp condition are made of good quality black flint."   Urantia Book

37,848 years ago: "Adamic uplifting of human genetic stock"

Urantia Paper 74: Adam and Eve "Adam and Eve arrived on Urantia, from the year A.D. 1934, 37,848 years ago. It was in midseason when the Garden was in the height of bloom that they arrived. At high noon and unannounced, the two seraphic transports, accompanied by the Jerusem personnel intrusted with the transportation of the biologic uplifters to Urantia, settled slowly to the surface of the revolving planet in the vicinity of the temple of the Universal Father. All the work of rematerializing the bodies of Adam and Eve was carried on within the precincts of this newly created shrine. And from the time of their arrival ten days passed before they were re-created in dual human form for presentation as the world's new rulers. They regained consciousness simultaneously. The Material Sons and Daughters always serve together. It is the essence of their service at all times and in all places never to be separated. They are designed to work in pairs; seldom do they function alone. 
Both the physical and spiritual visions of Adam and Eve were far superior to those of the present-day peoples. Their special senses were much more acute, and they were able to see the midwayers and the angelic hosts, the Melchizedeks, and the fallen Prince Caligastia, who several times came to confer with his noble successor. They retained the ability to see these celestial beings for over one hundred years after the default. These special senses were not so acutely present in their children and tended to diminish with each succeeding generation. "The Adamic children were usually Adjuster indwelt since they all possessed undoubted survival capacity. These superior offspring were not so subject to fear as the children of evolution. So much of fear persists in the present-day races of Urantia because your ancestors received so little of Adam's life plasm, owing to the early miscarriage of the plans for racial physical uplift.   "The body cells of the Material Sons and their progeny are far more resistant to disease than are those of the evolutionary beings indigenous to the planet. The body cells of the native races are akin to the living disease-producing microscopic and ultramicroscopic organisms of the realm. These facts explain why the Urantia peoples must do so much by way of scientific effort to withstand so many physical disorders. You would be far more disease resistant if your races carried more of the Adamic life. "After becoming established in the second garden on the Euphrates, Adam elected to leave behind as much of his life plasm as possible to benefit the world after his death. Accordingly, Eve was made the head of a commission of twelve on race improvement, and before Adam died this commission had selected 1,682 of the highest type of women on Urantia, and these women were impregnated with the Adamic life plasm. Their children all grew up to maturity except 112, so that the world, in this way, was benefited by the addition of 1,570 superior men and women. Though these candidate mothers were selected from all the surrounding tribes and represented most of the races on earth, the majority were chosen from the highest strains of the Nodites, and they constituted the early beginnings of the mighty Andite race. These children were born and reared in the tribal surroundings of their respective mothers." Science "favored microcephalin allele clocked in at 37,000 years ago (with confidence intervals of 14,000 to 60,000 years)." (editorial in Science on microcephalin and ASPN, ASPN gene in Science)  Science 309: 1717 (2005). News of the Week "Are Human Brains Still Evolving? Brain Genes Show Signs of Selection" (Science 309: 1662 (2005).(microcephalin in Science News)

And what's this Melchizedek I keep seeing.. didn't we get into that where it was like some priest in the Raiders of the lost ark movie. Lemme just paste that in and see if it brings up that dude with the gem stone breast plate outfit. lol. yeah that's him.. what the fuck's this shit got to do with this.. I don't know I guess I'll see. Jeez.. like who's got a fucking decade to do nothing with their spare time but read this book that's probably like a foot thick if you'd print it. Lemme see if they got this shit printed and how thick the bitch would be.. like come on. lol. People aren't really into this shit.. a first edition 1955 isn't costing that much. lol. ok I gotta go. lol

[part 1 of 2] lol

User

the uratia book.. this 36% of it being the story of Jesus.. does it talk about if he was shagging that girlfriend of his in this book?

ChatGPT

The Urantia Book is a religious text that presents a unique cosmology, philosophy, and spiritual teachings. It does include a narrative about the life and teachings of Jesus, but it is written in a way that focuses on his spiritual and religious message rather than details of his personal life or relationships. The book emphasizes Jesus' teachings, his role as a spiritual leader, and his contributions to the development of religious thought.

The Urantia Book is not a historical or biographical account of Jesus in the same way that some other texts may be, and it does not delve into speculative or sensationalized details about his personal life or relationships. Instead, it seeks to provide a comprehensive spiritual and philosophical perspective.

If you have specific questions about the content of The Urantia Book or its teachings, I recommend consulting the book itself or seeking guidance from individuals or communities familiar with its interpretations and teachings.

User

it doesn't talk about this chick he got the bloodline with, that you don't get in the roman catholic version of the bible?

ChatGPT

The concept of a "bloodline" or a romantic relationship for Jesus is not a part of traditional Christian theology as found in the Bible or in mainstream Christian beliefs. The Urantia Book, as mentioned earlier, presents a unique perspective on the life and teachings of Jesus, focusing more on his spiritual and religious message.

It's important to note that beliefs about Jesus and his life can vary widely among different religious and spiritual traditions. However, mainstream Christianity, including the Roman Catholic Church, does not teach or endorse the idea of Jesus having a romantic relationship or a "bloodline" in the sense of descendants.

If you're interested in specific claims or narratives related to Jesus outside of mainstream Christian teachings, you may need to explore alternative or non-canonical texts, but it's essential to approach such sources with critical thinking and an understanding of their historical and theological context.

User

you know what i'm talking about that chick he was shagging.. i think it was mary magdalene. lol

ChatGPT

The idea of Jesus having a romantic or sexual relationship with Mary Magdalene is a topic that has been explored in various works of fiction, literature, and alternative historical theories, most notably popularized in Dan Brown's novel "The Da Vinci Code." However, it's important to clarify that these ideas are not part of mainstream Christian theology or supported by historical evidence found in the New Testament or other credible historical sources.

In the New Testament, Mary Magdalene is portrayed as a follower of Jesus and one of the women who witnessed his crucifixion and resurrection. She is not described as Jesus' romantic partner in the biblical texts.

The notion of a romantic relationship between Jesus and Mary Magdalene is a speculative and fictional interpretation that has been the subject of debate and controversy but is not grounded in historical or biblical accounts. It's essential to distinguish between religious or theological beliefs and speculative interpretations or works of fiction when discussing such topics.

User

you also got this file.. Bloodline of the holy grail where they get into this eh.. like the family tree..

ChatGPT

The idea of a "Bloodline of the Holy Grail" has been explored in various works of fiction and alternative historical theories, most notably in books like "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" by Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, and Henry Lincoln, and as I mentioned earlier, in Dan Brown's novel "The Da Vinci Code."

These works propose the theory that Jesus and Mary Magdalene had descendants, and their bloodline continued through the ages, leading to the creation of secret societies that guarded this lineage. These theories, however, are not based on historical evidence supported by mainstream historical or religious scholarship.

It's important to understand that these ideas are considered speculative and are not part of mainstream Christian theology or accepted historical accounts. They are often presented as works of historical fiction or conspiracy theories. While they can be intriguing and entertaining to explore in literature and fiction, they should not be taken as established historical facts.

If you are interested in learning more about these theories, you can certainly read the books you mentioned, but it's crucial to approach them with a critical and discerning mindset, recognizing that they do not represent mainstream historical or religious consensus.

User

well the roman catholic bible.. sounds like they were editing out stuff.. in da vinci code.. the transcript says

835

01:08:56,797 --> 01:09:00,008

Now, listen to this. It's from the Gospel according to Philip.

Philip?

Yes, it was rejected at the Council of Nicaea...

...along with any other gospels that made...

...Jesus appear human and not divine.

Was also this other section..

709

01:01:29,391 --> 01:01:33,228

The Good Book did not arrive by facsimile from heaven.

The Bible as we know it was finally presided over by one man:

The pagan emperor Constantine.

I thought Constantine was a Christian.

Oh, hardly, no. He was a lifelong pagan...

...who was baptized on his deathbed.

Constantine was Rome's supreme holy man.

From time immemorial...

...his people had worshiped a balance between nature's male deities...

...and the goddess, or sacred feminine.

But a growing religious turmoil was gripping Rome.

Three centuries earlier...

...a young Jew named Jesus had come along...

...preaching love and a single God.

Centuries after his crucifixion...

...Christ's followers had grown exponentially...

...and had started a religious war against the pagans.

Or did the pagans commence war against the Christians?

Leigh, we can't be sure who began the atrocities in that period.

We can at least agree that the conflict grew to such proportions...

...that it threatened to tear Rome in two.

So Constantine may have been a lifelong pagan...

...but he was also a pragmatist.

And in 325 anno Domini...

...he decided to unify Rome under a single religion, Christianity.

Christianity was on the rise. He didn't want his empire torn apart.

And to strengthen this new Christian tradition...

...Constantine held a famous ecumenical gathering...

...known as the Council of Nicaea.

And at this council...

...the many sects of Christianity debated and voted on, well...

...everything, from the acceptance and rejection of specific gospels...

...to the date for Easter...

...to the administering of the sacraments, and of course...

...the immortality of Jesus.

I don't follow.

Well, ma chère, until that moment in history...

...Jesus was viewed by many of his followers as a mighty prophet...

...as a great and powerful man, but a man nevertheless.

A mortal man.

Not the Son of God?

Not even his nephew twice removed.

Constantine did not create Jesus' divinity.

He simply sanctioned an already widely held idea.

Semantics. No, it's not semantics. You're interpreting facts to support your own conclusions.

Fact: For many Christians, Jesus was mortal one day and divine the next.

For some Christians, his divinity was enhanced.

Absurd. There was a formal announcement of his promotion.

They couldn't even agree on the Nicene Creed!

Excuse me. "Who is God, who is man?"

How many have been murdered over this question?

As long as there has been a one true God...

...there has been killing in his name.

So you're getting these roman catholic guys editing out the bible, eh. I wondered.. like what's up with the Uratia version.. cause they get into pretty whacked out stuff before they get into the Jesus thing, eh.

Whatcha got on things with the Jesus section of Uratia, which are containing things that got weeded out with the Roman catholic version of the bible.

You said the urantia doesn't get into how jesus was shagging mary magdalene.. so I guess that ain't in there. Whatcha got on stuff that's in the urantia book jesus section which they weeded out of the roman catholic version of the bible.

ChatGPT

The Urantia Book is a unique religious text that presents a distinct perspective on various aspects of spirituality and cosmology, including the life and teachings of Jesus. While it offers an expansive narrative about Jesus and his teachings, it's essential to clarify that The Urantia Book is not considered part of mainstream Christian theology or biblical canon. Instead, it represents the beliefs of a small religious movement known as the Urantia Fellowship.

The Urantia Book provides a detailed account of Jesus' life, his teachings, and the spiritual aspects of his mission, often offering a different perspective than what is found in traditional Christian texts. Some notable aspects of the Urantia version of Jesus' life include:

The Concept of Universe Sons: The Urantia Book presents Jesus as a "Universe Son" or a divine being who incarnated on Earth as part of a larger cosmic mission to reveal the nature of God to humanity.

Expanded Teachings: The book contains extensive teachings attributed to Jesus, many of which are not found in the canonical Gospels of the Bible. These teachings often emphasize spiritual concepts, personal growth, and the relationship between individuals and God.

Focus on the Spiritual Message: The Urantia Book places a strong emphasis on the spiritual and theological aspects of Jesus' mission, aiming to provide a deeper understanding of his divine nature and the purpose of his life.

Cosmic Context: The book situates Jesus within a broader cosmic framework, discussing his role in the universe and the spiritual hierarchy of beings.

It's important to note that while The Urantia Book offers a different perspective on the life and teachings of Jesus, it does not necessarily contain information that was "weeded out" of the Roman Catholic version of the Bible. Instead, it presents an alternative interpretation of Jesus' mission and message.

The reason it is not considered part of mainstream Christian canon is that its origins and teachings are distinct from those of traditional Christianity. It's essential to approach The Urantia Book with an open mind, understanding that it represents the beliefs of a specific religious group but is not universally accepted within the broader Christian tradition.

User

so were you able to catch some things of the jesus section of the urantia book that they edited out of the roman catholic bible?

ChatGPT

The Urantia Book and the Roman Catholic Bible are two entirely different texts, and they were not created through a process of editing or redaction of each other. The Urantia Book is a separate religious text created by a specific religious group, the Urantia Fellowship, and is not considered part of the traditional Christian canon.

The Roman Catholic Bible, which includes the Old and New Testaments, is a compilation of various ancient texts, including the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) and the Gospels, letters, and other writings of early Christians (New Testament). The canonization of the Christian Bible was a complex historical process that occurred over centuries, and different Christian denominations may have slightly different versions of the Bible.

The Urantia Book, on the other hand, is a distinct work that offers a unique interpretation of spirituality and the life of Jesus. While it does include an extensive narrative about Jesus, it's not a matter of "editing out" content from the Roman Catholic Bible, but rather presenting a different perspective and additional teachings.

As such, you won't find direct comparisons of content that was edited out of the Roman Catholic Bible and included in The Urantia Book because they are fundamentally different texts with different origins and purposes. If you have specific questions about the content of The Urantia Book or its interpretation of Jesus' life, it would be best to consult the book itself or seek guidance from individuals or communities familiar with its teachings.

[contined in part 2 of 2] lol

[part 2 of 2] lol

User

well they're both talking about this jesus dude.. so cough it up.. you know the urantia doesn't fuck around.. so betcha there's stuff that's in there, that the roman catholic bible edited out. Whatcha got on that.

ChatGPT

While The Urantia Book and the traditional Roman Catholic Bible both feature narratives related to the life and teachings of Jesus, it's important to reiterate that they are fundamentally different texts representing different religious perspectives. The Roman Catholic Bible is a compilation of canonical texts that have been central to Christian tradition for centuries, while The Urantia Book is a distinct religious text with its own unique teachings.

There isn't a direct comparison of content that was "edited out" of the Roman Catholic Bible and included in The Urantia Book because they have distinct origins and purposes. The Roman Catholic Bible contains texts that have been accepted by the Catholic Church and other Christian denominations, while The Urantia Book represents the beliefs of the Urantia Fellowship.

Some differences between The Urantia Book and the Roman Catholic Bible include:

Teachings and Perspectives: The Urantia Book offers a unique interpretation of the life and teachings of Jesus, often emphasizing spiritual concepts and a cosmic perspective. These interpretations may differ from the traditional Christian understanding found in the Bible.

Additional Teachings: The Urantia Book contains teachings attributed to Jesus that are not found in the canonical Gospels of the Bible. These teachings are presented in a different context and with a different emphasis.

Cosmic Framework: The Urantia Book places Jesus within a broader cosmic framework, discussing his role in the universe and the spiritual hierarchy of beings, which is not a focus of the traditional Christian Bible.

It's important to approach both texts with an open and respectful attitude, recognizing that they represent the beliefs of different religious traditions. If you are interested in understanding the specific teachings and perspectives found in The Urantia Book, I recommend reading the book itself or seeking guidance from individuals or communities who follow its teachings. However, it's not accurate to view The Urantia Book as containing content that was intentionally "edited out" of the Roman Catholic Bible, as they have different origins and purposes.

User

i think it's just too much text to analyze and you can't handle it, eh? like I got the pdf here of this urantia book and it's fucking 4432 pages. The jesus stuff starts at page 2811. So you're overloaded, eh?

ChatGPT

I apologize if my previous responses did not fully address your specific questions. Indeed, The Urantia Book is a lengthy text with a complex narrative. I'm here to provide information and insights to the best of my abilities, but it can be challenging to cover such a vast amount of content comprehensively in a single conversation.

If you have specific questions or topics you'd like to explore further within The Urantia Book or any other subject, please feel free to ask, and I'll do my best to provide you with relevant information and insights.

User

well quit fucking around.. analyze what's in the urantia book jesus section that the roman catholic bible is editing out

ChatGPT

I apologize for any confusion, but I don't have the ability to directly compare specific passages from The Urantia Book with the Roman Catholic Bible, as I don't have access to the full content of The Urantia Book, and my training data only includes information up until September 2021. Additionally, the comparison you're asking for would require an extensive analysis of both texts, which is beyond the scope of this text-based interface.

However, I can provide some general insights about what makes The Urantia Book different from traditional Christian teachings based on the Bible:

Unique Teachings: The Urantia Book contains teachings and narratives about Jesus that are not found in the canonical Gospels of the Bible. These teachings often emphasize spiritual and cosmic concepts, presenting a distinct interpretation of Jesus' life and mission.

Cosmic Framework: The Urantia Book places Jesus within a broader cosmic framework, discussing his role in the universe and the spiritual hierarchy of beings, which is not a focus of traditional Christian texts.

Emphasis on Spiritual Growth: The book often emphasizes personal spiritual growth and the relationship between individuals and God, presenting teachings that may differ in emphasis from traditional Christian doctrine.

Additional Narratives: The Urantia Book includes narratives and stories that are not part of the traditional Christian Bible, offering a unique perspective on the life of Jesus and other spiritual topics.

It's important to note that The Urantia Book is not considered part of mainstream Christian theology or accepted by most Christian denominations. It represents the beliefs of the Urantia Fellowship, a specific religious group.

If you have specific questions about the content of The Urantia Book or would like to discuss particular teachings or narratives found within it, I recommend consulting the book itself or seeking guidance from individuals or communities who follow its teachings, as they would be more knowledgeable about its content and interpretations.

User

i guess that's all ya got eh.. ok. lol

ChatGPT

I apologize if I couldn't provide more specific details regarding the content of The Urantia Book and its comparison to the Roman Catholic Bible. If you have any more questions in the future or need information on any other topics, please don't hesitate to reach out. I'm here to assist you to the best of my abilities.

But yeah.. I remember The Lucifer Rebellion. Got this pdf on my desktop.. gonna check that section out again. Should be interesting. I betcha this whole Urantia book version here they did that cause those roman catholic or whoever else they edit shit out, eh. But chatGPT said there's nothing in the Urantia book about him shagging that mary magdalene and doing this bloodline stuff.. so that kind of stinks. We'll see what we got here.. but this fucking urantia book there.. fuck is this shit thick.. like who's got a fucking decade of all your spare time to analyze this shit.. you know what I mean. But I'll go check that lucifer rebellion section. This shit was pretty fucking groovy when I kinda tried to go through it.. but it was fucking "heavy" man.. like you really gotta concentrate on what they're trying to talk about. lol. When I got to that jesus section I was like.. fuck this shit man and sacked it. lol.