That is exactly what the flat earth psyop is intended to make you believe!
It's so retarded that it is NEVER worth your time to earnestly research. And even if you were to "swim upstream" and investigate anyway, the obfuscation from the offensively stupid and heavily advertised (i.e. funded) flat earth psyop would likely be what you first encountered (again, convincing you that there is nothing to the subject and no reason to dig deeper).
Much like the phrase "conspiracy theory/ist"; it is almost exclusively used to suppress and discredit ideas because they have merit.
No sailor uses ANY model to navigate. Models are not used for navigation.
Your model of the earth is literally the UN flag.
That isn't a model - that's a flag. You seem confused.
Snipers have to take earth curvature into account when they shoot.
Lol. Find a sniper and ask them this question. How far do you think snipers shoot anyway?!
Yeah it's a psyop. That's why there are so many videos from anon content creators
I describe them as agents and products of the flat earth psyop. Some are agents, some are products. Content creators have their own obvious motives - which ALSO have nothing to do with the shape of the world. There are many copycats.
The pysop is hitting you right in the face.
I agree - it is heavily advertised (i.e. heavily funded).
No sailor uses ANY model to navigate. Models are not used for navigation.
Model: a description or analogy used to help visualize something that cannot be directly observed.
So yes, ship navigation uses the globe as a model for navigation. If they could directly observe where they needed to go, they wouldn't rely on a model.
That isn't a model - that's a flag. You seem confused.
Consult a dictionary next time moron.
Find a sniper and ask them this question. How far do you think snipers shoot anyway?!
.338 Lapua Magnum has a firing range of 1.5 kilometers. So that's a horizontal drop of about 4 inches from the horizon that they have to account for.
Model: a description or analogy used to help visualize something that cannot be directly observed.
That may be your personal definition, but is not the definition of that word in any context. Specifically, when discussing this topic - model means scientific model.
In any case, no models are used for sailing/traveling of any kind; your personal definition included.
Consult a dictionary
Practice what you preach! A flag is not a model either. Even if it were, you said it was "my model" which is also wrong.
So that's a horizontal drop of about 4 inches from the horizon that they have to account for.
Talk to an actual sniper. You are repeating nonsense. No sniper accounts, or needs to account, for any such thing. Even if such curvature existed, they don't need to adjust for it because they are never shooting blindly at targets hidden behind the horizon - that would be silly. Beyond that, other factors would be orders of magnitude more influential - like wind...
Flat earth is one of two things: retarded pseudo intellectual moronic skeptics who would believe the lost their penis if their stomach got too big to see it, and the feds who managed to convince room temperature iq inbreds into believing it as a bonus when job their real job was just to make everyone in their targeted groups look like unhinged retards to normal people due to guilt by association so the only answer is to ban them or they will discredit anything that is actually valid like artificial diamond scarcity and scare off normies who might learn something and it gives ammo to journalists to mock us and ruin the optics. Go be retarded somewhere else.
In my experience, only people passing highschool physics can understand the answer.
Otherwise, people simply believe that they are on a spinning ball that they can never feel moving, or having a curve that they can never see.
I consider it just a programming. Some are awake, others will fight to defend the matrix. How many shows, tv series, news, animations promote the globe? And even more, they are quick to ridicule anyone against it. What is the worst thing you can call someone nowadays? "Flat-earther" or a "Conspiracy theorist".
Well said. Those matrix defenders literally act like never-trumpers when FE comes up. These are people not thinking for themselves (government tells them what to think/believe and they blindly accept it because "science")
The heavily advertised (i.e. funded) flat earth psyop is (obviously and by definition) a psyop.
The primary purpose of that psyop is to stop people from earnestly researching or discussing the subject because of how valuable it is.
It does this a variety of ways
Portraying "flat earthers" (nomenclature and visage both products of the psyop) as impossibly/unrealistically stupid. You are meant to believe that people this stupid aren't worth considering, and therefore anything they say is to always be ignored.
Loudly advertising demonstrably false claims. This supports #1 but also convinces some earnest wayward researchers to pick them up and repeat them. It's a method of "seeding strawmen". In the frightfully simplistic mind of the "debunker" and audience - 1 wrong claim = all wrong claims.
Encouraging (false) antagonism and enmity between a false dichotomy of "globers" vs "flerfers" (childish and inherently stupid derogatories like this are also products of the psyop). As long as they are enemies and squabling like children - they can't collaborate or effectively share knowledge / communicate.
They need to come up with a name for people who don't believe in flat earth, but also believe that cosmology is completely staged. Flat earthers have shined a spotlight on all of the hoaxes taking place in our space programs, media, and schools.
The world's shape is less important right now than why they are going to such great lengths to pretend they are in outers pace, have rovers on other planets, and promote demonstrably false explanations for things like stars. When we stop arguing over the shape and start focusing on the falsehoods, we might finally figure out what is going on.
They are called Globers and shape is important cause if it‘s flat w a firmament then there is the God of the Bible, or at least a creator. All the Satanists that promote the globe lose their camo.
I keep the idea as a possibility, but am less concerned about the shape than why there is so much deception surrounding it. I feel like we would make a lot more headway against these hoaxes if we stuck to showing everyone how obvious they are, rather than trying to move them on to a whole new paradigm like flat earth. If we were successful in breaking through these hoaxes on a mass scale, the shape of the earth would more than likely not be far behind.
No tipping point is going happen because flat earther's keep on being proven wrong. They cling to bad math. Then when shown their math is bad they double down. Like this:
No, it's not programming. It's the fact that the flat earth model is not used by any sailor doing star navigation. If the FE model worked they would use it. But it doesn't, so they don't.
Additionally, the entire argument made by FE is not to describe how FE is right, but try to find a contradiction in the globe and then hammer it. But every time this is done the math ends up being wrong. We can correct you but you'll keep doubling down and pushing this garbage.
If the earth was flat then sailers would use that model to navigate. But they don't. They use a star map from a globe. For example the north star is not visible in the southern hemisphere and a different star has to be used. According to your insane FE model it should be visible everywhere. But it's not.
Then there are other glaring contradictions like the lunar eclipse where the earth is directly between the earth and the moon. Again, this totally contradicts the flat earth model.
because parallel light cannot be an an single to cause this type of light spread.
The sun does not push out parallel light. It's a glowing ball of nuclear explosion and light comes from all the parts that are visible. So no, it wouldn't create a crisp shadow, but an umbra.
if you want, you can do some flat earth research so you are just speaking from one side of knowledge. its too easy to debate this.
The problem is that you are asserting laughable garbage.
Flat earth is too Retarded to be a psyop.
That is exactly what the flat earth psyop is intended to make you believe!
It's so retarded that it is NEVER worth your time to earnestly research. And even if you were to "swim upstream" and investigate anyway, the obfuscation from the offensively stupid and heavily advertised (i.e. funded) flat earth psyop would likely be what you first encountered (again, convincing you that there is nothing to the subject and no reason to dig deeper).
Much like the phrase "conspiracy theory/ist"; it is almost exclusively used to suppress and discredit ideas because they have merit.
No sailor uses a flat earth model to navigate.
Your model of the earth is literally the UN flag.
Snipers have to take earth curvature into account when they shoot.
Yeah it's a psyop. That's why there are so many videos from anon content creators. The pysop is hitting you right in the face.
No sailor uses ANY model to navigate. Models are not used for navigation.
That isn't a model - that's a flag. You seem confused.
Lol. Find a sniper and ask them this question. How far do you think snipers shoot anyway?!
I describe them as agents and products of the flat earth psyop. Some are agents, some are products. Content creators have their own obvious motives - which ALSO have nothing to do with the shape of the world. There are many copycats.
I agree - it is heavily advertised (i.e. heavily funded).
Model: a description or analogy used to help visualize something that cannot be directly observed.
So yes, ship navigation uses the globe as a model for navigation. If they could directly observe where they needed to go, they wouldn't rely on a model.
Consult a dictionary next time moron.
.338 Lapua Magnum has a firing range of 1.5 kilometers. So that's a horizontal drop of about 4 inches from the horizon that they have to account for.
That may be your personal definition, but is not the definition of that word in any context. Specifically, when discussing this topic - model means scientific model.
In any case, no models are used for sailing/traveling of any kind; your personal definition included.
Practice what you preach! A flag is not a model either. Even if it were, you said it was "my model" which is also wrong.
Talk to an actual sniper. You are repeating nonsense. No sniper accounts, or needs to account, for any such thing. Even if such curvature existed, they don't need to adjust for it because they are never shooting blindly at targets hidden behind the horizon - that would be silly. Beyond that, other factors would be orders of magnitude more influential - like wind...
I literally quoted the definition from a dictionary.
But if you want to use the more specific term "scientific model" then I am even more correct:
"Scientific models are representations of objects, systems, or events used to explain and predict the behavior of real objects or systems"
https://search.brave.com/search?q=define%3A+scientific+model&source=desktop
That is interesting - was it a reputable dictionary? Which one? It was a terrible definition in any case.
Where was the part of that (or your other one, for that matter) definition which mentioned using it for sailing?
Don't sweat it - we're all incorrect frequently. You get used to it - but refusing to acknowledge it causes great harm.
You’re pretty confident that water curves around a ball huh? And you’re up in here calling people retards. Amazing.
You must have me confused for someone else.
Never. I work very hard not to engage in ad hominem because it prevents/inhibits communication.
I'm called a retard (and worse) quite frequently though.
Flat earth is one of two things: retarded pseudo intellectual moronic skeptics who would believe the lost their penis if their stomach got too big to see it, and the feds who managed to convince room temperature iq inbreds into believing it as a bonus when job their real job was just to make everyone in their targeted groups look like unhinged retards to normal people due to guilt by association so the only answer is to ban them or they will discredit anything that is actually valid like artificial diamond scarcity and scare off normies who might learn something and it gives ammo to journalists to mock us and ruin the optics. Go be retarded somewhere else.
In my experience, only people passing highschool physics can understand the answer.
Otherwise, people simply believe that they are on a spinning ball that they can never feel moving, or having a curve that they can never see.
I consider it just a programming. Some are awake, others will fight to defend the matrix. How many shows, tv series, news, animations promote the globe? And even more, they are quick to ridicule anyone against it. What is the worst thing you can call someone nowadays? "Flat-earther" or a "Conspiracy theorist".
Agent Smith programming, when they change into an agent to attack you. I've seen it too many times, like a switch flipped
Well said. Those matrix defenders literally act like never-trumpers when FE comes up. These are people not thinking for themselves (government tells them what to think/believe and they blindly accept it because "science")
The heavily advertised (i.e. funded) flat earth psyop is (obviously and by definition) a psyop.
The primary purpose of that psyop is to stop people from earnestly researching or discussing the subject because of how valuable it is.
It does this a variety of ways
They need to come up with a name for people who don't believe in flat earth, but also believe that cosmology is completely staged. Flat earthers have shined a spotlight on all of the hoaxes taking place in our space programs, media, and schools.
The world's shape is less important right now than why they are going to such great lengths to pretend they are in outers pace, have rovers on other planets, and promote demonstrably false explanations for things like stars. When we stop arguing over the shape and start focusing on the falsehoods, we might finally figure out what is going on.
A 'duck' in prison is someone who is easily groomed.
They are called Globers and shape is important cause if it‘s flat w a firmament then there is the God of the Bible, or at least a creator. All the Satanists that promote the globe lose their camo.
I keep the idea as a possibility, but am less concerned about the shape than why there is so much deception surrounding it. I feel like we would make a lot more headway against these hoaxes if we stuck to showing everyone how obvious they are, rather than trying to move them on to a whole new paradigm like flat earth. If we were successful in breaking through these hoaxes on a mass scale, the shape of the earth would more than likely not be far behind.
No tipping point is going happen because flat earther's keep on being proven wrong. They cling to bad math. Then when shown their math is bad they double down. Like this:
https://twitter.com/Perpetualmaniac/status/1629735708960391170
But facts don't matter, they will keep on pushing this garbage.
No, it's not programming. It's the fact that the flat earth model is not used by any sailor doing star navigation. If the FE model worked they would use it. But it doesn't, so they don't.
Additionally, the entire argument made by FE is not to describe how FE is right, but try to find a contradiction in the globe and then hammer it. But every time this is done the math ends up being wrong. We can correct you but you'll keep doubling down and pushing this garbage.
That's correct. If the flat earth was correct then that would be the model for ship navigation, but it's not, and never has been, and never will be.
If the earth was flat then sailers would use that model to navigate. But they don't. They use a star map from a globe. For example the north star is not visible in the southern hemisphere and a different star has to be used. According to your insane FE model it should be visible everywhere. But it's not.
Then there are other glaring contradictions like the lunar eclipse where the earth is directly between the earth and the moon. Again, this totally contradicts the flat earth model.
The sun does not push out parallel light. It's a glowing ball of nuclear explosion and light comes from all the parts that are visible. So no, it wouldn't create a crisp shadow, but an umbra.
The problem is that you are asserting laughable garbage.