They need to come up with a name for people who don't believe in flat earth, but also believe that cosmology is completely staged. Flat earthers have shined a spotlight on all of the hoaxes taking place in our space programs, media, and schools.
The world's shape is less important right now than why they are going to such great lengths to pretend they are in outers pace, have rovers on other planets, and promote demonstrably false explanations for things like stars. When we stop arguing over the shape and start focusing on the falsehoods, we might finally figure out what is going on.
They are called Globers and shape is important cause if it‘s flat w a firmament then there is the God of the Bible, or at least a creator. All the Satanists that promote the globe lose their camo.
I keep the idea as a possibility, but am less concerned about the shape than why there is so much deception surrounding it. I feel like we would make a lot more headway against these hoaxes if we stuck to showing everyone how obvious they are, rather than trying to move them on to a whole new paradigm like flat earth. If we were successful in breaking through these hoaxes on a mass scale, the shape of the earth would more than likely not be far behind.
No tipping point is going happen because flat earther's keep on being proven wrong. They cling to bad math. Then when shown their math is bad they double down. Like this:
No, it's not programming. It's the fact that the flat earth model is not used by any sailor doing star navigation. If the FE model worked they would use it. But it doesn't, so they don't.
Additionally, the entire argument made by FE is not to describe how FE is right, but try to find a contradiction in the globe and then hammer it. But every time this is done the math ends up being wrong. We can correct you but you'll keep doubling down and pushing this garbage.
If the earth was flat then sailers would use that model to navigate. But they don't. They use a star map from a globe. For example the north star is not visible in the southern hemisphere and a different star has to be used. According to your insane FE model it should be visible everywhere. But it's not.
Then there are other glaring contradictions like the lunar eclipse where the earth is directly between the earth and the moon. Again, this totally contradicts the flat earth model.
They need to come up with a name for people who don't believe in flat earth, but also believe that cosmology is completely staged. Flat earthers have shined a spotlight on all of the hoaxes taking place in our space programs, media, and schools.
The world's shape is less important right now than why they are going to such great lengths to pretend they are in outers pace, have rovers on other planets, and promote demonstrably false explanations for things like stars. When we stop arguing over the shape and start focusing on the falsehoods, we might finally figure out what is going on.
A 'duck' in prison is someone who is easily groomed.
They are called Globers and shape is important cause if it‘s flat w a firmament then there is the God of the Bible, or at least a creator. All the Satanists that promote the globe lose their camo.
I keep the idea as a possibility, but am less concerned about the shape than why there is so much deception surrounding it. I feel like we would make a lot more headway against these hoaxes if we stuck to showing everyone how obvious they are, rather than trying to move them on to a whole new paradigm like flat earth. If we were successful in breaking through these hoaxes on a mass scale, the shape of the earth would more than likely not be far behind.
No tipping point is going happen because flat earther's keep on being proven wrong. They cling to bad math. Then when shown their math is bad they double down. Like this:
https://twitter.com/Perpetualmaniac/status/1629735708960391170
But facts don't matter, they will keep on pushing this garbage.
No, it's not programming. It's the fact that the flat earth model is not used by any sailor doing star navigation. If the FE model worked they would use it. But it doesn't, so they don't.
Additionally, the entire argument made by FE is not to describe how FE is right, but try to find a contradiction in the globe and then hammer it. But every time this is done the math ends up being wrong. We can correct you but you'll keep doubling down and pushing this garbage.
If the earth was flat then sailers would use that model to navigate. But they don't. They use a star map from a globe. For example the north star is not visible in the southern hemisphere and a different star has to be used. According to your insane FE model it should be visible everywhere. But it's not.
Then there are other glaring contradictions like the lunar eclipse where the earth is directly between the earth and the moon. Again, this totally contradicts the flat earth model.