If the earth was flat then sailers would use that model to navigate. But they don't. They use a star map from a globe. For example the north star is not visible in the southern hemisphere and a different star has to be used. According to your insane FE model it should be visible everywhere. But it's not.
Then there are other glaring contradictions like the lunar eclipse where the earth is directly between the earth and the moon. Again, this totally contradicts the flat earth model.
because parallel light cannot be an an single to cause this type of light spread.
The sun does not push out parallel light. It's a glowing ball of nuclear explosion and light comes from all the parts that are visible. So no, it wouldn't create a crisp shadow, but an umbra.
if you want, you can do some flat earth research so you are just speaking from one side of knowledge. its too easy to debate this.
The problem is that you are asserting laughable garbage.
If the earth was flat then sailers would use that model to navigate. But they don't. They use a star map from a globe. For example the north star is not visible in the southern hemisphere and a different star has to be used. According to your insane FE model it should be visible everywhere. But it's not.
Then there are other glaring contradictions like the lunar eclipse where the earth is directly between the earth and the moon. Again, this totally contradicts the flat earth model.
The sun does not push out parallel light. It's a glowing ball of nuclear explosion and light comes from all the parts that are visible. So no, it wouldn't create a crisp shadow, but an umbra.
The problem is that you are asserting laughable garbage.