No tipping point is going happen because flat earther's keep on being proven wrong. They cling to bad math. Then when shown their math is bad they double down. Like this:
No, it's not programming. It's the fact that the flat earth model is not used by any sailor doing star navigation. If the FE model worked they would use it. But it doesn't, so they don't.
Additionally, the entire argument made by FE is not to describe how FE is right, but try to find a contradiction in the globe and then hammer it. But every time this is done the math ends up being wrong. We can correct you but you'll keep doubling down and pushing this garbage.
If the earth was flat then sailers would use that model to navigate. But they don't. They use a star map from a globe. For example the north star is not visible in the southern hemisphere and a different star has to be used. According to your insane FE model it should be visible everywhere. But it's not.
Then there are other glaring contradictions like the lunar eclipse where the earth is directly between the earth and the moon. Again, this totally contradicts the flat earth model.
because parallel light cannot be an an single to cause this type of light spread.
The sun does not push out parallel light. It's a glowing ball of nuclear explosion and light comes from all the parts that are visible. So no, it wouldn't create a crisp shadow, but an umbra.
if you want, you can do some flat earth research so you are just speaking from one side of knowledge. its too easy to debate this.
The problem is that you are asserting laughable garbage.
No tipping point is going happen because flat earther's keep on being proven wrong. They cling to bad math. Then when shown their math is bad they double down. Like this:
https://twitter.com/Perpetualmaniac/status/1629735708960391170
But facts don't matter, they will keep on pushing this garbage.
No, it's not programming. It's the fact that the flat earth model is not used by any sailor doing star navigation. If the FE model worked they would use it. But it doesn't, so they don't.
Additionally, the entire argument made by FE is not to describe how FE is right, but try to find a contradiction in the globe and then hammer it. But every time this is done the math ends up being wrong. We can correct you but you'll keep doubling down and pushing this garbage.
That's correct. If the flat earth was correct then that would be the model for ship navigation, but it's not, and never has been, and never will be.
If the earth was flat then sailers would use that model to navigate. But they don't. They use a star map from a globe. For example the north star is not visible in the southern hemisphere and a different star has to be used. According to your insane FE model it should be visible everywhere. But it's not.
Then there are other glaring contradictions like the lunar eclipse where the earth is directly between the earth and the moon. Again, this totally contradicts the flat earth model.
The sun does not push out parallel light. It's a glowing ball of nuclear explosion and light comes from all the parts that are visible. So no, it wouldn't create a crisp shadow, but an umbra.
The problem is that you are asserting laughable garbage.