Some of the fossils you see, like in museums, aren’t even real, they’re models. When I took a Paleontology (fake science) course in university, they had a “homo erectus“ skull showing red and blue sections. Red sections were supposedly actually found and blue sections were inferred. About 80% of the skull was blue. I’d wager, if they were being honest, 100% should have been blue.
Dinosaurs and Darwin’s evolution theory are as fake and gay as Hollywood and Jurassic Park. There were potentially large beasts that died off thousands of years ago but nothing resembling a dinosaur.
Check it out, dude! CNN just posted a sciency article about a 41 million year old whale “fossil” with an “incomplete skull”. u/Eisenhorn can grab some talking points for his super sciencey posts!
C14 have a limit of ~30k years. You will get similar results with any object older than 30k years. It is like trying to measure single hair width with a school ruler - completely senseless.
Measuring C14 in any object older than ~30k years will just measure inevitable C14 contamination from atmosphere, bacteria, or algae.
Really, C14 dating is not used for dating paleofauna. Paleofauna age is estimated by layer formation time, where the remnants was found.
C14 dating is used mostly for proving antiquity of human artifacts made using wood or other plant materials, with assumption that they was made from fresh material, because C14 show the point when the plant died, not when artifact was made. You could easily make a "1000 year old chest" that will easily pass C14 dating test if you find a 1000 year log. Just don't use screws and aluminium brackets to assemble it. :)
Carbon dating of C14 has a half-life of 5730±30 years - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon-14 . That means that beyond that point it gets vastly different results than the actual ones. It is used today as a way to prove antiques, not as a reliable source of information.
Dinosaur bones are never found, they find only fossils - that's when a bone changes due to huge amounts of water that flush the actual bones and harden the structure with minerals that the water carries. Thus, proving the great flood in Noah's time.
The most famous dinosaur is Tyrannosaurus Rex - a large lizard with tiny hands. However, if you think of a bat, it has very fragile finger bones (that would create the bone structure of its wings) and ends every finger with a claw. If the bones decay and/or petrify, they will most probably destroy the fragile finger structure, leaving the nails alone. That suggests that Tyrannosaurus Rex was more like a winged dragon, than a tiny hand giant lizard...
Here's 100 reasons why evolution is stupid - https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ku0XDiyjFX8O/ . The idea that we all come from nothing and our lives doesn't matter is a project sold to children that have no idea how to counter these arguments in their youth. That's why most people believe the theory of evolution without ever thinking that it is still a theory.
Species-jumping is impossible. Animals can’t turn into humans.
The earth is 8-12,000 years old. Carbon dating is fake science. There isn’t enough time for evolution to have taken place even if it was possible.
Where are all the missing linkzzz and genetic freaks?
If you believe in species-jumping evolution from a crockpot named Darwin and the ridiculous notion that we came from primordial soup, then became animal, then magically humans, you’re brain dead. That doesn’t even account for stupid ideas like Big Bang.
Huh? “Biology” taught you that humans and animals are the same? Did biology also teach you that males and females are the same?
What? I didn’t say carbon dating was used to date the earth. It’s used to create a fake narrative about the earth’s age though. Do you know what “physics” is?
Come again? You don’t know what a missing link is and you’re a proponent of Darwin’s whacky, government-sanctioned ideas?
I see you’re a product of public, government-funded schooling. Name your top 3 reasons why evolution is fact. By the way, I personally believe evolutionists are the dumbest subset of humans around, next to vaxxers and NASA fans. You aren’t helping me change my mind here.
It's truly amazing how totally ignorant you are of things that children learn in school.
Were you homeschooled or why on earth don't you know even basic principles?
You are unable to define Evolution anyway. I have debated less ignorant creationists 30 years ago. It's been a while that I met a young earth creationist. I thought that you gus were dying out.
Damn, you’re actually making a strong case for evolution after all. You’re just another disciple of the fake science religion with sub-human intellect.
Fuck off, monkey, or give your top 3 reasons on why species-jumping evolution, a make-believe fairy tale for midwits, is real.
The most famous dinosaur is Tyrannosaurus Rex - a large lizard with tiny hands. However, if you think of a bat, it has very fragile finger bones (that would create the bone structure of its wings) and ends every finger with a claw. If the bones decay and/or petrify, they will most probably destroy the fragile finger structure, leaving the nails alone. That suggests that Tyrannosaurus Rex was more like a winged dragon, than a tiny hand giant lizard...
This is the funniest thing I read all week. Thanks.
I want to know which moron spends time and money on carbon dating dinosaur bones.
I want to know that too.
Either it is highly disturbing sign of complete degradation of educational institutions that produce a "specialists" who know how to use things, but have no any idea how they work, either it was done with purpose, to discredit scientific methods as whole in the eyes of normies. Either way it is a clear sign of something malicious, and by itself could be a huge rabbit hole.
I could easily imagine a conspiracy to discredit scientific method in whole to get rid of the only real way of finding truth about world around. With MSM one could manipulate herd about distant events, but it is still hard to manipulate first-hand expirience. F.e. it is hard to push some "global warming" if everybody have outdoor thermometer. To break that last connection with reality, one could try to destroy the process of perception itself, forcing herd to listening only for "experts" and not trusting their own observations and measurements.
Some of the fossils you see, like in museums, aren’t even real, they’re models. When I took a Paleontology (fake science) course in university, they had a “homo erectus“ skull showing red and blue sections. Red sections were supposedly actually found and blue sections were inferred. About 80% of the skull was blue. I’d wager, if they were being honest, 100% should have been blue.
Dinosaurs and Darwin’s evolution theory are as fake and gay as Hollywood and Jurassic Park. There were potentially large beasts that died off thousands of years ago but nothing resembling a dinosaur.
preach brother! homo erectus sounds like a name for gay sex position
Check it out, dude! CNN just posted a sciency article about a 41 million year old whale “fossil” with an “incomplete skull”. u/Eisenhorn can grab some talking points for his super sciencey posts!
https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/10/world/mini-whale-fossil-basilosaurid-scn/index.html
i use him as a reference point, whatever his opinion is on something odds are the actual truth is the complete opposite of what he say.
C14 have a limit of ~30k years. You will get similar results with any object older than 30k years. It is like trying to measure single hair width with a school ruler - completely senseless.
Measuring C14 in any object older than ~30k years will just measure inevitable C14 contamination from atmosphere, bacteria, or algae.
Really, C14 dating is not used for dating paleofauna. Paleofauna age is estimated by layer formation time, where the remnants was found.
C14 dating is used mostly for proving antiquity of human artifacts made using wood or other plant materials, with assumption that they was made from fresh material, because C14 show the point when the plant died, not when artifact was made. You could easily make a "1000 year old chest" that will easily pass C14 dating test if you find a 1000 year log. Just don't use screws and aluminium brackets to assemble it. :)
Thanks for this
Carbon dating of C14 has a half-life of 5730±30 years - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon-14 . That means that beyond that point it gets vastly different results than the actual ones. It is used today as a way to prove antiques, not as a reliable source of information.
Dinosaur bones are never found, they find only fossils - that's when a bone changes due to huge amounts of water that flush the actual bones and harden the structure with minerals that the water carries. Thus, proving the great flood in Noah's time.
The most famous dinosaur is Tyrannosaurus Rex - a large lizard with tiny hands. However, if you think of a bat, it has very fragile finger bones (that would create the bone structure of its wings) and ends every finger with a claw. If the bones decay and/or petrify, they will most probably destroy the fragile finger structure, leaving the nails alone. That suggests that Tyrannosaurus Rex was more like a winged dragon, than a tiny hand giant lizard...
Here's 100 reasons why evolution is stupid - https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ku0XDiyjFX8O/ . The idea that we all come from nothing and our lives doesn't matter is a project sold to children that have no idea how to counter these arguments in their youth. That's why most people believe the theory of evolution without ever thinking that it is still a theory.
Name your top 3
If you believe in species-jumping evolution from a crockpot named Darwin and the ridiculous notion that we came from primordial soup, then became animal, then magically humans, you’re brain dead. That doesn’t even account for stupid ideas like Big Bang.
Himans are animals. You fail at basic biology.
Carbon dating isn't used to determine the age of the Earth. You fail at basic physics.
The what? You don't even know the basics of what the Theory of Evolution is about.
Typical creationist. Has no fucking clue what he's talking about.
Top
Kek
Huh? “Biology” taught you that humans and animals are the same? Did biology also teach you that males and females are the same?
What? I didn’t say carbon dating was used to date the earth. It’s used to create a fake narrative about the earth’s age though. Do you know what “physics” is?
Come again? You don’t know what a missing link is and you’re a proponent of Darwin’s whacky, government-sanctioned ideas?
I see you’re a product of public, government-funded schooling. Name your top 3 reasons why evolution is fact. By the way, I personally believe evolutionists are the dumbest subset of humans around, next to vaxxers and NASA fans. You aren’t helping me change my mind here.
It's truly amazing how totally ignorant you are of things that children learn in school.
Were you homeschooled or why on earth don't you know even basic principles?
You are unable to define Evolution anyway. I have debated less ignorant creationists 30 years ago. It's been a while that I met a young earth creationist. I thought that you gus were dying out.
Damn, you’re actually making a strong case for evolution after all. You’re just another disciple of the fake science religion with sub-human intellect.
Fuck off, monkey, or give your top 3 reasons on why species-jumping evolution, a make-believe fairy tale for midwits, is real.
Define Evolution so we have a basis for discussion.
Amazing argument.
This is the funniest thing I read all week. Thanks.
Anyone have some more links/evidence for the dinosaur hoax theory?
http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2015/09/dinosaur-hoax-dinosaurs-never-existed.html Eric Dubay summarizes most of the available information. Theres also some stuff out there in regards to Trex bones with soft tissue intact.
Thanks for this
Id say 80-90% of it. Modern society is built on lies and the majority of $cience is junk meaning the results can not be reproduced.
Petrified wood
Link to the source. I want to know which moron spends time and money on carbon dating dinosaur bones.
I want to know that too.
Either it is highly disturbing sign of complete degradation of educational institutions that produce a "specialists" who know how to use things, but have no any idea how they work, either it was done with purpose, to discredit scientific methods as whole in the eyes of normies. Either way it is a clear sign of something malicious, and by itself could be a huge rabbit hole.
I could easily imagine a conspiracy to discredit scientific method in whole to get rid of the only real way of finding truth about world around. With MSM one could manipulate herd about distant events, but it is still hard to manipulate first-hand expirience. F.e. it is hard to push some "global warming" if everybody have outdoor thermometer. To break that last connection with reality, one could try to destroy the process of perception itself, forcing herd to listening only for "experts" and not trusting their own observations and measurements.
There are no dinosaur bones. When they existed their densest part would be no harder than cartilage.
You can literally go to places where dinosaur bones lie around in the open.
Do you think someone made those up?
Link?
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/why-jurassic-coast-is-one-best-fossil-collecting-sites-on-earth-180975003/
🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂
Are you like 12?
Do you think all the fossils that you can literally pick up from the beach there are fake?
Are you 10? Do you believe what you read without any proof??