If many consent to suggested creationism (implies out of nothing); while ignoring perceivable transmutation (out of; within and in response to everything), then a suggesting few can tempt a consenting many to wander (Latin spatior; space) within nothingness (nihilism)...to boldly go "where no man has gone before"..."to infinity and beyond"..."a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away"...that's a lot of wandering.
GLORY (Latin gnoria; knowledge) + KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"...suggested "glory hole" tempts one to ignore "perceivable whole".
Keep an open mouth.
Nature needs to be let go while tempting those within to want to keep holding onto.
Wandering is opening possibilities while free will is closing them...
a) free (will of choice) implies within dom (inance of balance); since only within balance can there be choice.
b) choice within balance implies center of surrounding aka reaction (life) within enacting (inception towards death); hence potential (temporary growth) within potentiality (ongoing loss)...only within loss can there be growth.
c) being implies in-between (life) opening (inception) and closure (death).
d) everything perceivable "was" before anyone within can suggest to one another what it "is".
like everything else
a) whole (perceivable) sets itself apart (perceiving) aka sameness (process of dying) differentiates (living) internally.
b) others suggest same (together with) to tempt one (apart from) to ignore self by reacting alike (similar) aka
c) equality (same) through diversity (difference) represents the suggested inversion of apartheid (life) within wholeness (inception towards death).
d) notice "apartheid" israel suggesting "tikkun olam" (healing the world by bringing together" to their surrounding...
e) diaspora aka diametric (diagonal of a circle) + sporadic (separate; apart from) aka center of surrounding.
f) if each one of many ignores ones free will of choice for suggested choices by others; then a few become "chosen ones".
wandering should be done in moderation
a) only within center (momentum) of surrounding (motion) can one have the free will of choice to wander.
b) "should" implies obligation...suggesting it to others tempts one to ignore being OBLIGO (bound to react) within -TION (action), hence choice (reaction) within balance (enacting).
Ones consent to the suggestion of another implies reaction submitting to reaction, while ignoring enacting source (balance).
c) being (life) implies while being done (inception towards death), which offers opportunity to RE (respond to) DO (being done by), hence the opportunity of temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death).
Suggested DONE (performed; executed; finished) tempts one to ignore being (perceiving) done by (perceivable)...hence not done yet.
d) MOD'ERATE, adjective [Latin moderor, to limit, from modus, a limit.]..."dom"inance of balance represents limit for ones "free" will of choice aka free (life) limited within dom (inception towards death)...free-dom.
Consenting to suggested moderation by suggesting moderators tempts one to limit self by willing submission to others.
Leading and following should be balanced
a) being implies choice (center) within balance (surrounding)...ignoring this for the choices of others imbalances oneself.
b) others suggest one to follow leads, which tempts one to ignore being resistance (life) within direction (inception towards death).
c) balance (momentum) is lead by motion, hence motion generating momentum within itself...choice exits at the center (life) of surrounding momentum/balance (inception/death), while being directed through motion.
Consenting to any suggestions (fiction) by others tempts one to ignore growing self discernment within perceivable (reality).
Notice that while being alive; one cannot perceive ones inception and death; hence being divided (as choice) within the momentum (balance) thereof...
knowing and ignorance
a) choice exists in-between knowledge (perceivable inspiration) and understanding (suggested information)...the latter tempts one to ignore the former; while "standing under" those suggesting it.
b) fiction (suggested information) represents ones ignorance of reality (perceivable inspiration).
teaching and learning
a) to teach self implies to learn for self and vice versa...others tempts one to ignore that.
b) consenting to the suggestions of others tempts one to stand under (understand) as student under teacher, hence establishing a chain of command based on submission to authority aka following orders instead of being resistance within natural order.
c) resistance is fertile...hence choosing to resist (life) temptation (inception towards death) growing resistance.
d) if one adapts to perceivable inspiration; then one grows (expressed outwards) comprehension (compressed within) of perceivable (impressing); yet if one consents to suggested information, then one represses self under the oppression of others.
Sleight of hand by Madonna: "express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry; it's human nature".
yin and yang
a) Black/White balance for spectrum of choice at the center...consenting to suggested symbolism tempts one to ignore perceivable symmetry.
b) if all represents one in energy (internal/inherent power) then ignoring this for suggested "and" tempts one to want more (suggested) than offered (perceivable).
Ask yourself...energy and what? What if energy represents external (whole) for internal existence (partials) and what if internal lacks discernment about external? What if lack (loss) represents foundation for surplus (growth)?
Let me ask you, what difference does it really make if the world is flat or not. We have our beliefs, humans have never been known for their rationality, your not going to change someones core unless its through some life altering event. Like getting poisoned with refrigerant lmao.
If this one singular god is as truly powerful as you all have been brought up your entire life to believe, it doesnt matter if we are surrounded by space, or water. I dont know how science proving the existence of a burning ball of gas that is 151.98 million km away, or showing the very existence of the particles (which as one preacher puts it, is showing the building blocks that god has used to build the universe), disproves that. If it that is all it takes to shake your faith, then maybe you dont truly believe.
I believe in something, but I certainly think after 2000 years that kings/queens/religion, have twisted that into their own purposes. I always used to wonder as a kid, how do we know the devil didnt win 2000 years ago and weve all been worshipping the wrong religion, lmao. I was closer to the truth as a 8 year old than most adults get their entire life.
I bet the government loves flat earth, instead of running around actually researching something that matters ( and im one to talk with the amount of time i spend researching/reading about ancient religions and aliens, useless in todays political/societal context ). So instead of organizing or learning how your politicians are literally bought and traded by corporations, like mike dewine and the first energy crisis, your chasing 2000 year old fairy tales about a flat earth when they knew other continents existed.
I don't like this "what difference does it make" argument against flat earth theory.
For one, you sound like Hillary Clinton.
Two, the difference of whether we live on a PLANE of existence or a 3D floating spinning massive balls in an expanding universe makes a difference on how you perceive the REALM that you live in.
Does it make a difference whether a fish is in a fish bowl or in the ocean? Yes. On all kinds of things, including the SIZE of the fish.
You do make some good points. One being that I still have to go outside today and get some work done, feed the animals, tend to the land, make repairs, etc. whether i'm on a ball or plane.
Me ten years ago would have scoffed and accused you of being ridiculous by suggesting that 77 separate space programs in 77 sovereign nations are all in some kind of mass collusion to trick us all.
But then I saw it happen with COVID and every healthcare body in every nation all colluding to push a massive scam.
If many consent to suggested creationism (implies out of nothing); while ignoring perceivable transmutation (out of; within and in response to everything), then a suggesting few can tempt a consenting many to wander (Latin spatior; space) within nothingness (nihilism)...to boldly go "where no man has gone before"..."to infinity and beyond"..."a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away"...that's a lot of wandering.
Look into glory holes. Keep an open mouth.
GLORY (Latin gnoria; knowledge) + KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"...suggested "glory hole" tempts one to ignore "perceivable whole".
Nature needs to be let go while tempting those within to want to keep holding onto.
a) free (will of choice) implies within dom (inance of balance); since only within balance can there be choice.
b) choice within balance implies center of surrounding aka reaction (life) within enacting (inception towards death); hence potential (temporary growth) within potentiality (ongoing loss)...only within loss can there be growth.
c) being implies in-between (life) opening (inception) and closure (death).
d) everything perceivable "was" before anyone within can suggest to one another what it "is".
a) whole (perceivable) sets itself apart (perceiving) aka sameness (process of dying) differentiates (living) internally.
b) others suggest same (together with) to tempt one (apart from) to ignore self by reacting alike (similar) aka
c) equality (same) through diversity (difference) represents the suggested inversion of apartheid (life) within wholeness (inception towards death).
d) notice "apartheid" israel suggesting "tikkun olam" (healing the world by bringing together" to their surrounding...
e) diaspora aka diametric (diagonal of a circle) + sporadic (separate; apart from) aka center of surrounding.
f) if each one of many ignores ones free will of choice for suggested choices by others; then a few become "chosen ones".
a) only within center (momentum) of surrounding (motion) can one have the free will of choice to wander.
b) "should" implies obligation...suggesting it to others tempts one to ignore being OBLIGO (bound to react) within -TION (action), hence choice (reaction) within balance (enacting).
Ones consent to the suggestion of another implies reaction submitting to reaction, while ignoring enacting source (balance).
c) being (life) implies while being done (inception towards death), which offers opportunity to RE (respond to) DO (being done by), hence the opportunity of temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death).
Suggested DONE (performed; executed; finished) tempts one to ignore being (perceiving) done by (perceivable)...hence not done yet.
d) MOD'ERATE, adjective [Latin moderor, to limit, from modus, a limit.]..."dom"inance of balance represents limit for ones "free" will of choice aka free (life) limited within dom (inception towards death)...free-dom.
Consenting to suggested moderation by suggesting moderators tempts one to limit self by willing submission to others.
a) being implies choice (center) within balance (surrounding)...ignoring this for the choices of others imbalances oneself.
b) others suggest one to follow leads, which tempts one to ignore being resistance (life) within direction (inception towards death).
c) balance (momentum) is lead by motion, hence motion generating momentum within itself...choice exits at the center (life) of surrounding momentum/balance (inception/death), while being directed through motion.
Consenting to any suggestions (fiction) by others tempts one to ignore growing self discernment within perceivable (reality).
Notice that while being alive; one cannot perceive ones inception and death; hence being divided (as choice) within the momentum (balance) thereof...
a) choice exists in-between knowledge (perceivable inspiration) and understanding (suggested information)...the latter tempts one to ignore the former; while "standing under" those suggesting it.
b) fiction (suggested information) represents ones ignorance of reality (perceivable inspiration).
a) to teach self implies to learn for self and vice versa...others tempts one to ignore that.
b) consenting to the suggestions of others tempts one to stand under (understand) as student under teacher, hence establishing a chain of command based on submission to authority aka following orders instead of being resistance within natural order.
c) resistance is fertile...hence choosing to resist (life) temptation (inception towards death) growing resistance.
d) if one adapts to perceivable inspiration; then one grows (expressed outwards) comprehension (compressed within) of perceivable (impressing); yet if one consents to suggested information, then one represses self under the oppression of others.
Sleight of hand by Madonna: "express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry; it's human nature".
a) Black/White balance for spectrum of choice at the center...consenting to suggested symbolism tempts one to ignore perceivable symmetry.
b) if all represents one in energy (internal/inherent power) then ignoring this for suggested "and" tempts one to want more (suggested) than offered (perceivable).
Ask yourself...energy and what? What if energy represents external (whole) for internal existence (partials) and what if internal lacks discernment about external? What if lack (loss) represents foundation for surplus (growth)?
Let me ask you, what difference does it really make if the world is flat or not. We have our beliefs, humans have never been known for their rationality, your not going to change someones core unless its through some life altering event. Like getting poisoned with refrigerant lmao.
If this one singular god is as truly powerful as you all have been brought up your entire life to believe, it doesnt matter if we are surrounded by space, or water. I dont know how science proving the existence of a burning ball of gas that is 151.98 million km away, or showing the very existence of the particles (which as one preacher puts it, is showing the building blocks that god has used to build the universe), disproves that. If it that is all it takes to shake your faith, then maybe you dont truly believe.
I believe in something, but I certainly think after 2000 years that kings/queens/religion, have twisted that into their own purposes. I always used to wonder as a kid, how do we know the devil didnt win 2000 years ago and weve all been worshipping the wrong religion, lmao. I was closer to the truth as a 8 year old than most adults get their entire life.
I bet the government loves flat earth, instead of running around actually researching something that matters ( and im one to talk with the amount of time i spend researching/reading about ancient religions and aliens, useless in todays political/societal context ). So instead of organizing or learning how your politicians are literally bought and traded by corporations, like mike dewine and the first energy crisis, your chasing 2000 year old fairy tales about a flat earth when they knew other continents existed.
Mind blowing really.
I don't like this "what difference does it make" argument against flat earth theory.
For one, you sound like Hillary Clinton.
Two, the difference of whether we live on a PLANE of existence or a 3D floating spinning massive balls in an expanding universe makes a difference on how you perceive the REALM that you live in.
Does it make a difference whether a fish is in a fish bowl or in the ocean? Yes. On all kinds of things, including the SIZE of the fish.
You do make some good points. One being that I still have to go outside today and get some work done, feed the animals, tend to the land, make repairs, etc. whether i'm on a ball or plane.
Me ten years ago would have scoffed and accused you of being ridiculous by suggesting that 77 separate space programs in 77 sovereign nations are all in some kind of mass collusion to trick us all.
But then I saw it happen with COVID and every healthcare body in every nation all colluding to push a massive scam.