That woman did a hit and run for a company that' pays her pennies, and treats her like shit. She should have been bagging his items, and walking him to his bike.
She probably got the sack? Happens all the time. In these instances today. Seen and read such fucking shit today. Burglars suing people. Criminals excused for the crappiest reasons. Such fucking crap. Except for the fact he wasn't injured. He didn't press charges because he stole. As he wasn't injured no foul, unless the store took it further. The police didn't seem too. Which is why they didn't pursue the evidence. Camera doorbells actually aren't very admissible unless they show crime affecting the person whose doorbell it is, or are requested by the police for their own investigations.
It could've been dangerously liable if there was any significant injury.
But she tried to do her job, and I doubt it was a collusion at impact. Although dangerous.
You're right those stores aren't supposed to do shit. Because today it's always somebody else's job, the police solving what, not much, crime increases, they do shit, unless it's shit to you when you ain't
done nothing, because it's nobody's job, and nothing gets done, because it's always a fucking excuse. So sick of it. Clown World.
Amazon sells the ring data to LEO. It is absolutely used in court, you do not own the data. And, they try to delete it when they get caught doing wrong.
You're confusing two issues. If she was on the clock, there were policies, and procedures she agreed to not just follow, but implement as a mgr.
Fuck policy.
Really.
Havent people bent over long enough?
That woman did a hit and run for a company that' pays her pennies, and treats her like shit. She should have been bagging his items, and walking him to his bike.
She probably got the sack? Happens all the time. In these instances today. Seen and read such fucking shit today. Burglars suing people. Criminals excused for the crappiest reasons. Such fucking crap. Except for the fact he wasn't injured. He didn't press charges because he stole. As he wasn't injured no foul, unless the store took it further. The police didn't seem too. Which is why they didn't pursue the evidence. Camera doorbells actually aren't very admissible unless they show crime affecting the person whose doorbell it is, or are requested by the police for their own investigations.
It could've been dangerously liable if there was any significant injury.
But she tried to do her job, and I doubt it was a collusion at impact. Although dangerous.
You're right those stores aren't supposed to do shit. Because today it's always somebody else's job, the police solving what, not much, crime increases, they do shit, unless it's shit to you when you ain't done nothing, because it's nobody's job, and nothing gets done, because it's always a fucking excuse. So sick of it. Clown World.
Amazon sells the ring data to LEO. It is absolutely used in court, you do not own the data. And, they try to delete it when they get caught doing wrong.
Is she held responsible for shrinkage? If so, I bet she'd have a much easier time covering up a little excursion than a bikeful of stolen items.
You would be hit and run willing over shrinkage?!
You misspelled your name, it should be :
Hammurabi
Policy says wear a mask and let the Jew inject you with mRNA serum. you are pussy faggot and don't belong here.
Vlad, go suck your own.