She probably got the sack? Happens all the time. In these instances today. Seen and read such fucking shit today. Burglars suing people. Criminals excused for the crappiest reasons. Such fucking crap. Except for the fact he wasn't injured. He didn't press charges because he stole. As he wasn't injured no foul, unless the store took it further. The police didn't seem too. Which is why they didn't pursue the evidence. Camera doorbells actually aren't very admissible unless they show crime affecting the person whose doorbell it is, or are requested by the police for their own investigations.
It could've been dangerously liable if there was any significant injury.
But she tried to do her job, and I doubt it was a collusion at impact. Although dangerous.
You're right those stores aren't supposed to do shit. Because today it's always somebody else's job, the police solving what, not much, crime increases, they do shit, unless it's shit to you when you ain't
done nothing, because it's nobody's job, and nothing gets done, because it's always a fucking excuse. So sick of it. Clown World.
Amazon sells the ring data to LEO. It is absolutely used in court, you do not own the data. And, they try to delete it when they get caught doing wrong.
No. They really don't on shit like that, murder, burglary, violent crime, etc. Maybe in America. They suggest you have a duty to report crime, sure. What happens when it gets you in trouble for it? What was that? None of your business. Nothing happened. Read what the police did. Nothing. More trouble. You're filming and people can sue you.
There are parallel worlds. Police act in certain interests, somebody else beating them over the head. Otherwise they don't act, unless it's to shit on you. They just get paid like everybody else. Today their attitude is some of the worst I have ever seen. Not all, just the majority. Woke, stupid, and make excuses.
The police have turned into such lazy useless cunts. They profile you, and not the criminal. You report something they've started running your background, excusing, the crime.
You know what police would've done there on location. They would've arrested her. Then after an interview after the maximum time in custody 12-24 hours, they would've checked the shop cctv. If they lazily bothered at another date acquiring it. They would've made the criminal press charges so they can fill out their report. Finally they might try to arrest the criminal who probably gave them a fake name and address. After that she'd be sacked.
So the lazy police, didn't bother. No point in looking for the idiot. No point in charging her on whose interests. The criminal hadn't reported a crime, injury. They couldn't even be arsed looking for him off a camera doorbell, it's not their property, or the shop's. No evidence unless she's guilty.
The camera as stated was inadmissible. Who was the victim? What was that? More bullshit than it's worth.
Aside these police today, it is often postcode, background, status are all assholes. No, it's not my attitude. It is there's. If you think, they have your interests, they really don't. Factually you're a problem, that they'd rather not do anything about.
Hey. You missed what I said about the ring network. It's a big deal, entire neighborhoods have switched companies. You pay them, and they sell it to LEO. It's not yours.
Yes and no. The point being what was that? Who actually decides to press charges? There are only charges if there are victims. Tell me who they were? How can police pursue if nothing actually occurred? Why are the police pursuing what if? This fucking stupid company is doing what with that data? Nothing unless your property is breached. Or serious crimes takes place in view of the camera. It would still need the police requesting that data? Yes. Otherwise what charges? The odds are it's on another camera unless the police are canvassing?
However there are certain circumstances outside of this, where you're being spied on. But this ain't the normal police requiring access.
She probably got the sack? Happens all the time. In these instances today. Seen and read such fucking shit today. Burglars suing people. Criminals excused for the crappiest reasons. Such fucking crap. Except for the fact he wasn't injured. He didn't press charges because he stole. As he wasn't injured no foul, unless the store took it further. The police didn't seem too. Which is why they didn't pursue the evidence. Camera doorbells actually aren't very admissible unless they show crime affecting the person whose doorbell it is, or are requested by the police for their own investigations.
It could've been dangerously liable if there was any significant injury.
But she tried to do her job, and I doubt it was a collusion at impact. Although dangerous.
You're right those stores aren't supposed to do shit. Because today it's always somebody else's job, the police solving what, not much, crime increases, they do shit, unless it's shit to you when you ain't done nothing, because it's nobody's job, and nothing gets done, because it's always a fucking excuse. So sick of it. Clown World.
Amazon sells the ring data to LEO. It is absolutely used in court, you do not own the data. And, they try to delete it when they get caught doing wrong.
No. They really don't on shit like that, murder, burglary, violent crime, etc. Maybe in America. They suggest you have a duty to report crime, sure. What happens when it gets you in trouble for it? What was that? None of your business. Nothing happened. Read what the police did. Nothing. More trouble. You're filming and people can sue you.
There are parallel worlds. Police act in certain interests, somebody else beating them over the head. Otherwise they don't act, unless it's to shit on you. They just get paid like everybody else. Today their attitude is some of the worst I have ever seen. Not all, just the majority. Woke, stupid, and make excuses.
The police have turned into such lazy useless cunts. They profile you, and not the criminal. You report something they've started running your background, excusing, the crime.
You know what police would've done there on location. They would've arrested her. Then after an interview after the maximum time in custody 12-24 hours, they would've checked the shop cctv. If they lazily bothered at another date acquiring it. They would've made the criminal press charges so they can fill out their report. Finally they might try to arrest the criminal who probably gave them a fake name and address. After that she'd be sacked.
So the lazy police, didn't bother. No point in looking for the idiot. No point in charging her on whose interests. The criminal hadn't reported a crime, injury. They couldn't even be arsed looking for him off a camera doorbell, it's not their property, or the shop's. No evidence unless she's guilty.
The camera as stated was inadmissible. Who was the victim? What was that? More bullshit than it's worth.
Aside these police today, it is often postcode, background, status are all assholes. No, it's not my attitude. It is there's. If you think, they have your interests, they really don't. Factually you're a problem, that they'd rather not do anything about.
Hey. You missed what I said about the ring network. It's a big deal, entire neighborhoods have switched companies. You pay them, and they sell it to LEO. It's not yours.
Yes and no. The point being what was that? Who actually decides to press charges? There are only charges if there are victims. Tell me who they were? How can police pursue if nothing actually occurred? Why are the police pursuing what if? This fucking stupid company is doing what with that data? Nothing unless your property is breached. Or serious crimes takes place in view of the camera. It would still need the police requesting that data? Yes. Otherwise what charges? The odds are it's on another camera unless the police are canvassing?
However there are certain circumstances outside of this, where you're being spied on. But this ain't the normal police requiring access.