Elon Musk has a QAnon following
(media.scored.co)
Comments (27)
sorted by:
who the fuck is "qanon"???
there's Q. there's anons. there is no fucking "qanon.
It’s the original name for the character in the first months after it began posting. The name is in line with its imageboard predecessors—FBIanon, CIAanon, etc. The people who were either proven to be real leakers or just LARPing about it.
no, Q was just Q. FBIanon, Meganon, et.al. were given (or appropriated) the "anon" add-on very early in their relative posting careers. i know, because i was following Q pre-tripcode. about a week before Mega had her meltdown.
Q was never Qanon. it was one of the things us q-tards laughed about when normies tried to talk knowledgeably about Q. the "anon" modifier didn't become a regular thing among q followers until sometime after Biden's inaugural.
I literally just told you that you were wrong.
The same happened with Q-LARP. Whether it ever referred to itself as anything other than Q is irrelevant; others did say “Qanon” (and it’s the… what the hell? My autocorrect just made the A lowercase. Does… it know about this shit?)
lol. and who the fuck are you to tell anyone anything? all you do is shit up comment sections. you STILL haven' posted anything on the site, coward.
Good god, you’re a mentally defective pile of shit. No one gives a fuck about your communist claptrap. At least you’re a former Qultist.
> communist
> Qultist
lol. pick one you fucking poser. i don't know what your game is, but you sure af don't know shit about Q or those who got caught up in it, poser. a poser AND a coward.
incidentally, are you still sending PM's where you forget to remove "template: response" from the subject header? lol, you fraud.
Scream for me.
I post objective truth and sophists lose their minds over it.
I’m personally responsible for getting it banned from 8chan’s /pol/ board for being a proven hoax, and I’m the one who invented the term “Q-LARP” (which it itself later mentioned). I’ve been on it since the start. It was irrefutably proven to be a hoax exactly one week after it first posted. That’s when it ended. It was over then.
Ah, so you admit that it’s a cult and you were swept up in an emotional appeal rather than any factual evidence. Got it.
The best part about you remembering this is that you still don’t have a single fucking clue why I typed that, despite it being explicitly explained to you.
I'll play along with your charade of pretending not to be a qtard
https://communities.win/search?params=qanon&community=GreatAwakening
i was 100% a glued-to-my-laptop qtard from pre-tripcode thru shortly after Biden's inaugural. it was ALWAYS just "Q"
Everyone who cultivated a personality on the chans was referred to as "X anon". Q was called Q anon in the early days following that same pattern
No. "Q" was always just "Q".
One of the first major attempts at collating and explaining the drops. Notice the title is "The Book of Q", not "The Book of Qanon". Also worth noting not once is Q referred to as Qanon. Look up MouthyBuddha's vids from 2018-2020. Not once is Q referred to as Qanon.
Look up the boards for yourself and see. Go to the forums from '18-'20 and try to find qultists referring to Q as Qanon. Then turn off the MSM and stop letting other people do your thinking for you.
This argument was always stupid as fuck in my eyes. The guy above is right. The only thing qteam was trying to convey was how the media will collude to push a unified agenda and qanon was the monicker they ran with and that they weren't a single anon. You guys will repeatedly lose sight of the forest for the trees.
Yeah I don't really understand the point of it. "Huuuuh what's Q-ANON???? There's Q and there's anons lol!!" Which even if we discount how everyone on the chans is called X anon colloquially if they have any type of name (obviously not known by newfags pulled there by Q), there is no point to the argument. It's a child-like gotcha. An empty, reflexive response. A programmed talking point triggered by a verbal (textual) stimulus, showing how easily influenced people are. Kind of NPC-like just on the other side of the political spectrum
It never was and everyone knows it but I'm not gonna debate it anymore.
Positive: Interesting way to earn for living (without a need to send 100s of CVS) - for those who want to be journalists
Negative: Who knows if the platform would pay all journalists 100% of their earnings (minus Twitter commission, of course). They can “shadow ban” selected journalists financially and pay 10% of the real income to those they don’t like.
https://nitter.nl/YoumotherFUDer/status/1652720359723134976
Everything that's wrong with this guy:
The Washington Post is a CIA cutout organization owned by Amazon. Remember how Amazon never made a profit until they got a 300 million dollar contract with the CIA for data centers, and ever since then their data centers have been their most profitable business? And in that same quarter, Bezos bought WaPo using the funds the CIA gave him?
Of course not. No one remembers anything anymore.
microtransactions for articles as an idea has been around for a long time
https://crawfordmediaconsulting.com/microtransactions-the-news-idea-that-wont-die/
It always fails - all it takes is one person to grab a copy and repost it
I guess Elon has there wherewithal to create some sort of DRM like NetFlix but then he runs the risk of becoming a publisher and losing Section 230 protections
the information for sale age
as the sub-genius foundation has always said:
"you will pay to know what you really think"
Yeah, any news that's worth knowing will reach people for free. Just because fake news is free doesn't mean that paying for news will reduce fake news.