Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

9
Elon Musk has a QAnon following (media.scored.co)
posted 2 years ago by user20461 2 years ago by user20461 +11 / -2
27 comments share
27 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– VeilOfReality 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

Everyone who cultivated a personality on the chans was referred to as "X anon". Q was called Q anon in the early days following that same pattern

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– glownigger8675309 -1 points 2 years ago +1 / -2

No. "Q" was always just "Q".

One of the first major attempts at collating and explaining the drops. Notice the title is "The Book of Q", not "The Book of Qanon". Also worth noting not once is Q referred to as Qanon. Look up MouthyBuddha's vids from 2018-2020. Not once is Q referred to as Qanon.

Look up the boards for yourself and see. Go to the forums from '18-'20 and try to find qultists referring to Q as Qanon. Then turn off the MSM and stop letting other people do your thinking for you.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– muhqtardtho 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

This argument was always stupid as fuck in my eyes. The guy above is right. The only thing qteam was trying to convey was how the media will collude to push a unified agenda and qanon was the monicker they ran with and that they weren't a single anon. You guys will repeatedly lose sight of the forest for the trees.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– VeilOfReality 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

Yeah I don't really understand the point of it. "Huuuuh what's Q-ANON???? There's Q and there's anons lol!!" Which even if we discount how everyone on the chans is called X anon colloquially if they have any type of name (obviously not known by newfags pulled there by Q), there is no point to the argument. It's a child-like gotcha. An empty, reflexive response. A programmed talking point triggered by a verbal (textual) stimulus, showing how easily influenced people are. Kind of NPC-like just on the other side of the political spectrum

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy