Ah crap, Earth actually is a spinning ball
(youtube.com)
Comments (42)
sorted by:
If the earth was flat like a table, cats would've knocked everything off of it by now. checkmate, flat-earthers :)
All that proves is he moved his camera at the same direction and speed as the sky moves. It doesnt prove flat or round earth.
I just thought it was funny
It proves rotation. Flat Earthers often deny it.
Regardless to the shape of the Earth. There are still people outside your known borders who control your life.
https://patriots.win/p/16b5zaa3rF/tucker-no-one-cares-if-youre-a-f/c/
I would say his statement, "no one cares if you're a flat earther" isn't accurate. Most people don't think flat earthers really exist, or it's just a big joke. Which is why I didn't look into it for a long time. But most people are religiously zealous of infinite void spinning heliocentic globe model, due to programming since birth. They have visceral disgust over FE after all the sci-fi movies. And the topic has been algorithmicly controlled since 2016. They are careful about full on bans because that could create the Streisand effect.
And what I am saying is that it doesn't matter what shape the earth is. As it does not change your actual daily life.
There are immense spiritual implications if you know you live in a divinely created realm. Otherwise you will believe we were a cosmic accident that has no significance in the vastness of space. If people believe they weren't divinely creates, then our human authorities are the source of morality and order. This is why the cabal has to hide God from as many people as possible.
And so, your opinion on the divinity of your God is Based solely on your belief that he could not make a ball?
No, Despite being a Christian most of my life, I had no idea that Biblical/Hebrew cosmology described a flat, fixed, domed earth. I realized nasa space travel was 100% fake. At that point I realized the Flat Earth crowd had made really good arguments against space propaganda so I looked into FE. I realized due to my career I had spent years looking at things that were geometrically impossible. Then the more I looked at the globe model, the more ridiculous and problematic it seemed. Way down the road I realized the Bible confirmed it.
Obviously fake.
If flat then people instead of believing in god may just believe they are in prison. With the belief of space people dont feel like they are in prison only that there is or is not a god. Wouldnt change anything other than people who believed in space now believe they are in prison and those who believe in god still believe in god. The energy of the people is now directed at the controllers who are prisoners with us, and we know what happens to pedophiles in prison. So its better for controllers to direct energy of the people to the belief of space.
It changed my actual daily life, because it changed me and my understanding of actual daily life. It brought me back to God.
What is the moon?
I dont know, it's hard to get up there to check it out. But it looks nothing like the film studio full of concrete dust we saw in the 'moonlandings'.
Is it a physical object thousands of miles away from the surface of the earth?
Some people have used trigonometry to estimate its size and distance. I think they came out with 2 or 3 thousand miles high and around 38 miles wide. Biblical cosmology describes the sun/moon/stars as contained within the firmament, not under it. If this is true then I imagine a dome firmament would have a significant effect on the light distribution. It might be like asking me to measure the size and location of a rainbow, which is impossible to do. But the moon does seem to emit its own light which is cold and has a negative charge, while the sun's light is hot and has a positive charge. I believe this is also the true cause of the tides as water (especially salt water) is magnetic.
Here is an interesting clip I found of a scientist claiming the moon is plasma. https://www.bitchute.com/video/6eNy1PpjDEs/
Can you provide anything in the way of proof, other than the fact that it fits with the flat earth theory?
The thing I see flat earthers do all the time is that they seem to work backwards from a flat earth conclusion, and then come up with theories to explain away the discrepancies with observable natural phenomena that would be violated by a flat earth model.
The last time a flat earther explained to me why the moon is occluded by a horizon, and I presented follow up scenarios that contradicted the original explanation, he dropped the bomb on me that he didn't even believe the moon to be a physical object as we know it, so my scenarios were not a valid way to disprove the flat earth model.
And that's pretty telling when you get there, because you find out that these people not only think the earth is flat, but they have also adopted god knows how many other beliefs to make the flat earth model work. And they never tell you those beliefs up front. It's never "hey the earth is flat, and the moon is a 38 mile wide ball of plasma, and the sun is a sphere of golden snakes". It's always "the earth is flat and lol at you for not knowing about the golden snakes, take this bitchute link and go educate yourself".
It feels very disingenuous. Usually when people have a hard-to-swallow theory that they're trying to convince me of, they do their best to explain it carefully and methodically, not by finding the quickest way to "gotcha" me out of the conversation.
I get that these things need to be true to make the flat earth model work. But that doesn't mean they are.
First let me say that I respect the way you are approaching this. You seem to be very rational and intellectually honest. And I think I understand where you are coming from.
I think coming up with Flat Earth explanations for all sorts of phenomenon is the wrong way to go. Let's stick with two of the most fundamental claims that main stream science tells us. The earth is a sphere of 24,901 miles in circumference, and our earth is spinning and orbiting simultaneously. If either of those claims can be dismantled, then your view of cosmology should be reassessed completely.
Also not that I want to make a big deal about it, but I think the burden of proof is on the globies to prove those claims. No human can perceive the motion of the earth with their own senses. We can't even perceive it with the Michelson Morley experiment to measure the speed of light in various directions to prove our motion. And even Steal-the-bike-Tyson admits the earth looks flat from red bull jump altitude. No child would think we live on a spinning globe unless they were programmed to think do.
So if you are genuinely curious, I would focus on the 2 claims I mentioned first, rather than what flat earthers claim for various phenomenon. I'm kinda buzzed at the moment but I'll try to address any follow up you have tomorrow. Cheers!
They’re careful about not banning FE because they want stupid retards poisoning the well with that crap.
How can the earth be round or flat if solpsism is real?
I suppose I can't prove its not all a figment of my imagination or a digital simulation, but whatever it is... it's not a spinning globe.
Like I can't prove its flat, it might be a huge turtle shell. But I can prove its not a sphere of 21,600 naughtical miles using laser tests and observing objects far beyond what should be geometrically possible. I just call it flat cause it seems to be.
we dont have to prove what it is, just what it isnt
Exactly
Then prove it instead of declaring you can prove it.
Here is a semi recent observation I took. However it should have been hidden by more curvature than I showed in this example. The tallest peak of an island was 70.5 miles from my location. I wrote 64 miles because that was the distance of the nearest shore of the island. Had I done the calculations for 70.5 miles rather than 64, the island wood have been hidden 600 feet under the geometric horizon. So I was actually generous in this example.
https://communities.win/c/flatearthresearch/p/16ZXQp6ItT/flat-earth-observation-san-cleme/c
You CAN prove it by testing for curvature. Just need a landmark that’s far enough away, preferably over water.
Well I'm just saying, if the curvature were a million times more subtle then they tell us, but was still there.... I might have a hard time detecting it with optical tests. But since the alleged curve is quite dramatic, it's obviously not there.
Or the plane we live on is a lot bigger than we are told.
Solpsism does not change nor negate the existence of an objective reality. It just means you can not prove it conclusively.
You have asked an invalid Question.
Objective reality doesn't exist in a solopsistic world view, by definition.
Well that's great. Then I don't have to let you define that word! Thus proving you wrong. Is that paradoxal? Doesn't matter. The world is solopsistic!
Another fake and gay loser
Lmao, can you guys try a little harder?
You can do the same effect by sticking the camera to a motor and having it rotate in sync with the sky.
No different than this video,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UH_74q2QSM
One is fixed to the planet, one is to the sky.
This doesnt prove that earth is flat one way or the other really, but its funny you guys think its fake. Basic spatial awareness here.
Fucking boomer looking fucker billyzig that shared this on twitter.
Chill it's a joke, besides it was globies that portrayed it as a proof.
Billyzig is great.
It actually shows rotation, despite its nonsense spinning, it expected you to watch the sky and its position by comparison.
Expectation has a large influence on experience (aka placebo).
Also, people have difficulty delineating between rotation (of the sky or earth) and the spherical shape of the world. There is no reason for them to be conflated, but they almost always are. Like the world or sky couldn’t rotate if the world were some other shape than a sphere...