Suggests peaceful noncompliance, that we all simply stop paying income taxes.
The problem is all the normies, even many on the right still don't realize even income tax is a fraud and not paying for anything here.
There's still too many of our own people who would fight against us just "following the law" as if legalism = morality even when the laws are unjust and leading to enslavement and genocide.
Indeed. But where does one one find this income that is not taxed? Also, even if it was a coordinated effort, I do believe they could, by this time, probably arrest us all. This isn't about money anymore, the 'funding' can't be cut, I think. I wanna try, I really do, and I know I sound like a doomer but I just don't know that there's a way out. I also don't think we should freak out and storm the gates or whatever and I hope I don't sound like a pacifist when I say I think we need to get together, largely, and pray to the only God that can enact real change. I'll get arrested for that, all day, everyday.
Perceivable income (inception towards death) generates perceiving tax (burdened life)...others suggest nothing (not) to distract one from comprehending this.
if it was a coordinated effort
Living represents ones effort within the coordinating process of dying.
arrest us all
How could those within motion be arrested (cessation of motion)? Could ones willing ignorance thereof represent "arrested develop-ment"?
I just don't know that there's a way out
What if the few suggest escapism (a way out) to tempt the many to ignore being within (life) way (inception towards death)? Is there another way for life than being moved from inception towards death?
storm the gates
Consider if ignorance of perceivable represents the gate within ones mind/memory; and that reasoning (conflict) over suggested represents the storm raging within ones ignorant mind/memory?
Afterwards...reconsider the "I of the storm"?
pacifist
-IST (pacifist) implies ones willing submission to suggested -ISM (pacifism), and those who consent to any -ISM put themselves into a conflict of reason (war vs peace).
You should do this A PRIORI. You don’t pay a fucking hitman to come kill you. That’s what taxes are. They don’t need your taxes in the first place because they spend without regard for inlays. It’s not in and of itself relevant to resistance and does nothing to change their power.
I don't know man, I've thought this through for a lot of years, and I'm fairly convinced it is the most viable path.
You're generally one of the smarter people on forums, so I'm interested to hear your reasoning, but here is mine:
Direct attack (of any kind) against them is pointless. You're not going to beat them at the game they own, control top to bottom and can change the rules for. Any direct attack and they will use it to end you (in whatever form that means in whatever the situation is).
The answer, to me, is the same as the rest of life in general, get others to play your game, and play to your strengths. It is just another form of asymmetric warfare. Build communities of people locally that can sustain a complete economy outside of the mainstream system, and build networks of those communities for trade, travel, protection, etc.
Economics rules all, and it is not economically viable for them to come after an entire decentralized society if it is not directly interfering with theirs. They would likely kill or imprison higher profile players at times to scare others from following, but not go after then entirety of the parallel societies.
The concept is similar to the Taliban and/or Ghandi and/or plenty of other examples of asymmetric long-term wins, even if those official stories are mostly BS.
Yes, they will make it extremely difficult for most to survive without full compliance, but there is always another way, IME. Eventually, this system they are building will collapse (I mean after the fake collapse they are currently orchestrating), though that could take 100 years or more.
Even if you don't buy into the full parallel society plan, mass noncompliance is the answer. Everything they are doing is dependent on almost total compliance. Even 10%, but ideally 30% and there is just way they can move down those paths.
I just can't see how you win a kinetic war against the most heavily armed opponent in history though.
And I go back to everything is economics. It would be incredibly, prohibitively expensive to go after everyone that does not participate in their system, especially if there is no direct interference with their plans. The ROI is not there, nor is the public's appetite to participate in a long drawn out war against their own citizens, no matter how much the propaganda machine can brainwash them.
Yes, they would go after some of the more high profile people, to make an example of them, but it just isn't feasible to go after everyone.
As long as a parallel system has a complete enough economy to mostly survive without needing to depend on the mainstream, then it would mostly be safe.
EDIT: this is not to say don't band together and defend what is rightfully yours if and when they come for you, definitely do that. just saying offense is not the winning game that I can tell.
I just can't see how you win a kinetic war against the most heavily armed opponent in history though.
Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq seemed to manage it.
It would be incredibly, prohibitively expensive to go after everyone that does not participate in their system
They print currency out of thin air. Cost means nothing to them. Release a media report saying we’re all terrorists and their supporters will line up to kill us for free. They’re literally on the verge of doing this already.
especially if there is no direct interference with their plans
Their plan is literally to exterminate every white person from the face of the earth. Us being alive is direct interference.
As long as a parallel system has a complete enough economy to mostly survive without needing to depend on the mainstream, then it would mostly be safe.
Tell that to every nation that tried to exit the IMF system. Oh wait, you can’t; they invaded, killed the government, bombed the infrastructure to rubble and replaced them with puppets…
Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq are roughly the models I'm advocating. None of those initiated a full on direct kinetic war, they moved out of the cities and defended what was rightfully theirs, and largely outlasted and maintained their ways of life to varying degrees. Asymmetric warfare.
And it kind of proves my point, they didn't go through every mountain rooting out opposition, because that is not economically viable. They mostly went after figureheads and those that were directly causing problems.
Same with "nations that tried to exit the IMF"...I'm not talking about creating a nation state, I'm talking about creating a parallel society that exists alongside the mainstream system but does not directly compete. Live on the outskirts of the system, interacting at the edges and the black markets within, and wait for its eventual collapse (comparable to the US eventually leaving Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq).
I agree, though, they do seem intent on exterminating us, but as far as saving our nation states, I don't think there is any coming back from where we're at. In that sense they've already won. Move to the outskirts and wait for it to collapse.
If things were to swing back hard the other way, I'd be afraid it was a setup like Germany after Weimar. That may have seemed great for a decade, but how did it end?
You would need a coordinated effort but coordinated efforts get tainted by feds too quick and easily. Non participation seems to be the easiest way. Homestead
i will not shop, support, or pay for ANY company that supports any of these absurdities. let them rot and go out of business. yes! hope they all go under and lose everything, while they beg for forgiveness, crying and pleading on the air
I have to say I pretty much reject outright any suggestion "They" are trying to provoke revolt or any other such thing. I would base that on these grounds:
If They want some "major event", They don't need to provoke it, They'll just manufacture it like J6. The day of, that probably required only 100 or so personnel on the ground.
Everything They do is based on higher degrees of predictability. That's what everything from "track and trace" to CDBC to getting rid of cars that didn't have built-in 3G cell connections is all about. They monitor so They may predict.
Unleashing any form of chaos is antithetical to that, and only to be used extremely judiciously. Most importantly, that's where it may be shut off instantly. Don't hear from the riotous BLM any more, do you? Of course not, it was shut off.
If real shooting starts with real bullets, I could not even begin to predict how it would unfold and I am certain They could not either. Frankly, I think it's the very last thing They want.
Suggests peaceful noncompliance, that we all simply stop paying income taxes.
The problem is all the normies, even many on the right still don't realize even income tax is a fraud and not paying for anything here.
There's still too many of our own people who would fight against us just "following the law" as if legalism = morality even when the laws are unjust and leading to enslavement and genocide.
Indeed. But where does one one find this income that is not taxed? Also, even if it was a coordinated effort, I do believe they could, by this time, probably arrest us all. This isn't about money anymore, the 'funding' can't be cut, I think. I wanna try, I really do, and I know I sound like a doomer but I just don't know that there's a way out. I also don't think we should freak out and storm the gates or whatever and I hope I don't sound like a pacifist when I say I think we need to get together, largely, and pray to the only God that can enact real change. I'll get arrested for that, all day, everyday.
Perceivable income (inception towards death) generates perceiving tax (burdened life)...others suggest nothing (not) to distract one from comprehending this.
Living represents ones effort within the coordinating process of dying.
How could those within motion be arrested (cessation of motion)? Could ones willing ignorance thereof represent "arrested develop-ment"?
What if the few suggest escapism (a way out) to tempt the many to ignore being within (life) way (inception towards death)? Is there another way for life than being moved from inception towards death?
Consider if ignorance of perceivable represents the gate within ones mind/memory; and that reasoning (conflict) over suggested represents the storm raging within ones ignorant mind/memory?
Afterwards...reconsider the "I of the storm"?
-IST (pacifist) implies ones willing submission to suggested -ISM (pacifism), and those who consent to any -ISM put themselves into a conflict of reason (war vs peace).
In short...-ISM contradicts PACIFY.
So he’s a shill, then. It doesn’t work.
You should do this A PRIORI. You don’t pay a fucking hitman to come kill you. That’s what taxes are. They don’t need your taxes in the first place because they spend without regard for inlays. It’s not in and of itself relevant to resistance and does nothing to change their power.
I don't know man, I've thought this through for a lot of years, and I'm fairly convinced it is the most viable path.
You're generally one of the smarter people on forums, so I'm interested to hear your reasoning, but here is mine:
Direct attack (of any kind) against them is pointless. You're not going to beat them at the game they own, control top to bottom and can change the rules for. Any direct attack and they will use it to end you (in whatever form that means in whatever the situation is).
The answer, to me, is the same as the rest of life in general, get others to play your game, and play to your strengths. It is just another form of asymmetric warfare. Build communities of people locally that can sustain a complete economy outside of the mainstream system, and build networks of those communities for trade, travel, protection, etc.
Economics rules all, and it is not economically viable for them to come after an entire decentralized society if it is not directly interfering with theirs. They would likely kill or imprison higher profile players at times to scare others from following, but not go after then entirety of the parallel societies.
The concept is similar to the Taliban and/or Ghandi and/or plenty of other examples of asymmetric long-term wins, even if those official stories are mostly BS.
Yes, they will make it extremely difficult for most to survive without full compliance, but there is always another way, IME. Eventually, this system they are building will collapse (I mean after the fake collapse they are currently orchestrating), though that could take 100 years or more.
Even if you don't buy into the full parallel society plan, mass noncompliance is the answer. Everything they are doing is dependent on almost total compliance. Even 10%, but ideally 30% and there is just way they can move down those paths.
This means shooting them, though. They’re not going to allow you to “peacefully” disobey their rules.
I just can't see how you win a kinetic war against the most heavily armed opponent in history though.
And I go back to everything is economics. It would be incredibly, prohibitively expensive to go after everyone that does not participate in their system, especially if there is no direct interference with their plans. The ROI is not there, nor is the public's appetite to participate in a long drawn out war against their own citizens, no matter how much the propaganda machine can brainwash them.
Yes, they would go after some of the more high profile people, to make an example of them, but it just isn't feasible to go after everyone.
As long as a parallel system has a complete enough economy to mostly survive without needing to depend on the mainstream, then it would mostly be safe.
EDIT: this is not to say don't band together and defend what is rightfully yours if and when they come for you, definitely do that. just saying offense is not the winning game that I can tell.
Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq seemed to manage it.
They print currency out of thin air. Cost means nothing to them. Release a media report saying we’re all terrorists and their supporters will line up to kill us for free. They’re literally on the verge of doing this already.
Their plan is literally to exterminate every white person from the face of the earth. Us being alive is direct interference.
Tell that to every nation that tried to exit the IMF system. Oh wait, you can’t; they invaded, killed the government, bombed the infrastructure to rubble and replaced them with puppets…
Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq are roughly the models I'm advocating. None of those initiated a full on direct kinetic war, they moved out of the cities and defended what was rightfully theirs, and largely outlasted and maintained their ways of life to varying degrees. Asymmetric warfare.
And it kind of proves my point, they didn't go through every mountain rooting out opposition, because that is not economically viable. They mostly went after figureheads and those that were directly causing problems.
Same with "nations that tried to exit the IMF"...I'm not talking about creating a nation state, I'm talking about creating a parallel society that exists alongside the mainstream system but does not directly compete. Live on the outskirts of the system, interacting at the edges and the black markets within, and wait for its eventual collapse (comparable to the US eventually leaving Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq).
I agree, though, they do seem intent on exterminating us, but as far as saving our nation states, I don't think there is any coming back from where we're at. In that sense they've already won. Move to the outskirts and wait for it to collapse.
If things were to swing back hard the other way, I'd be afraid it was a setup like Germany after Weimar. That may have seemed great for a decade, but how did it end?
You would need a coordinated effort but coordinated efforts get tainted by feds too quick and easily. Non participation seems to be the easiest way. Homestead
We should demand that government workers get boosted every 4 months for our safety. Adhere to their own recommendations.
To all the keyboard warriors in this thread.
You go first.
i will not shop, support, or pay for ANY company that supports any of these absurdities. let them rot and go out of business. yes! hope they all go under and lose everything, while they beg for forgiveness, crying and pleading on the air
I have to say I pretty much reject outright any suggestion "They" are trying to provoke revolt or any other such thing. I would base that on these grounds:
If They want some "major event", They don't need to provoke it, They'll just manufacture it like J6. The day of, that probably required only 100 or so personnel on the ground.
Everything They do is based on higher degrees of predictability. That's what everything from "track and trace" to CDBC to getting rid of cars that didn't have built-in 3G cell connections is all about. They monitor so They may predict.
Unleashing any form of chaos is antithetical to that, and only to be used extremely judiciously. Most importantly, that's where it may be shut off instantly. Don't hear from the riotous BLM any more, do you? Of course not, it was shut off.
If real shooting starts with real bullets, I could not even begin to predict how it would unfold and I am certain They could not either. Frankly, I think it's the very last thing They want.