a) how can one set into motion (acting), while being set (life) into motion (inception towards death)?
b) how could one "do", while being (living) done by (process of dying)?
c) choice (reaction) can only exist within balance (momentum) of motion (action).
d) what comes first..."reacting" to a director or being branded "actor" for doing so?
e) a picture implies a "captured moment", while the few suggest "motion pictures" aka moving a captured moment to tempt others to ignore ongoing momentum.
f) if nature directs (inception towards death) and those within react (life), then one could grow comprehension about being reactor (temporary growth) within generator (ongoing loss)...what if others could exploit ones ignorance thereof?
g) suggested trying (discover by evaluation) tempts one to ignore that value (perceivable) is offered for evaluation (perceiving). Nature doesn't need to be discovered, it reveals itself so that each one within can express self...others suggest "natural discovery" to distract from expressing, while tempting one to consent to repressing.
I have a song for this: https://take-me-to.space/xzqpFPb.mp3
Apparently, the movie production was a disaster. Foxx had frequent outbursts of uncontrolled anger and fired a bunch of people.
I think he may have had micro-strokes months ago, and finally got a regular stroke.
But, they will probably diagnose him with aphasia, or vasculitis.
Here https://conspiracies.win/p/16an0kpdw3/vaxx-required-for-jamie-foxxs-to/c/
https://youtu.be/_wv04_GDlfs
It was a stroke.
Being directed by implies being a "reactor" to...others suggest "actor" as the inversion thereof.
https://www.etymonline.com/word/act https://www.etymonline.com/word/react Try harder.
a) how can one set into motion (acting), while being set (life) into motion (inception towards death)?
b) how could one "do", while being (living) done by (process of dying)?
c) choice (reaction) can only exist within balance (momentum) of motion (action).
d) what comes first..."reacting" to a director or being branded "actor" for doing so?
e) a picture implies a "captured moment", while the few suggest "motion pictures" aka moving a captured moment to tempt others to ignore ongoing momentum.
f) if nature directs (inception towards death) and those within react (life), then one could grow comprehension about being reactor (temporary growth) within generator (ongoing loss)...what if others could exploit ones ignorance thereof?
g) suggested trying (discover by evaluation) tempts one to ignore that value (perceivable) is offered for evaluation (perceiving). Nature doesn't need to be discovered, it reveals itself so that each one within can express self...others suggest "natural discovery" to distract from expressing, while tempting one to consent to repressing.
This is 4 days old and old news and not a mystery at all anymore. Try to keep up with the news.
Spoiler: no, it was not what you imply.
https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/celebrities/2023/04/16/643c5145e2704ed61c8b459a.html
You do know that people have been falling down with all kinds of ailments long before covid was ever a thing?