the headline can't be trusted either. I read this an immediately thought that this is some kind of attempt to fix/prevent 'vaccine-hesitancy'. it's as if they're saying, the vaccines are safe, but we need to work on the manufacturing process, i.e. only 4% error rate/slippage is pretty good...nope. fuck vaccines. forever
That would imply some degree of organized analysis on the before and after.
I would suggest instead it is the latest invocation of a known plan with predicted outcomes. Most likely simply incremental effort as part of the over arching plan.
The majority of rhetoric used over the past 50+ years by the criminals, has been about population issues.
Initially predicting problems and more recently blaming any and all conceivable issues on the same.
So I think it is about energy and access reduction, reducing capability and density using a variety of methods.
This explains most of the moves made by the criminals that have sequestered power in a variety of ways via criminal enterprise and the mafia type of connectivity they operate with.
I am specifically referring to the actual manufacturing factories. Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, AZ - they are mere marketing arms. None of them did ANY manufacturing. All Manufacturing was outsourced to more than a dozen of different factories/sub-contractors.
The comment I wrote, was in reference to this paper:
Which only contains Danish Medical Agency (DKMA) Serious Adverse Events data, so only for Denmark. As per DKMA data, the Pfizer BNT162b2 shots used in Denmark came from only few EU based factories manufacturing for Pfizer.
The earlier data you refer to, is an independent study is by Craig Paardekooper, and it was done purely on the US VAERS data, so only for the BNT162b2 batches manufacture in the US (and this does NOT included the DMED data, as military got their own specific Pfizer batches). This came out in October 2021, not "a few years ago".
And the above paper is the first published, peer-review data on the subject.
The Danish paper clearly demonstrates (with enough statistical power) that the deadly batches were not small (in medical production variation, 4.2% is not small, it's huge). 0.05% would have been small.
"study shows..."
can never be trusted.
the headline can't be trusted either. I read this an immediately thought that this is some kind of attempt to fix/prevent 'vaccine-hesitancy'. it's as if they're saying, the vaccines are safe, but we need to work on the manufacturing process, i.e. only 4% error rate/slippage is pretty good...nope. fuck vaccines. forever
So much for QA/QC. Why would you want that for something that’s supposed to go into the human body? Derp.
"safe and effective" derrrrrr
I wonder where these particular batches were distributed. Obviously not into the arms of Trump or Biden or Pelosi or Schumer or Pence
I would guess Republican areas and other rural locations.
Criminals.
I recall someone posted that the adverse events and deaths were disproportionately occurring in red republican areas.
The bio-weapon likely targets specific races based upon the ACE2 receptor studies that showed that white Europeans were the targeted class.
What happened to the Japanese study finding particles in the vaccines?
That was Moderna, but all it did was a few million vials withdrawn from use (only in Japan).
It was a giant experiment. My guess is to help make way for Neural Link like technologies
Not really convinced it was an experiment no.
That would imply some degree of organized analysis on the before and after.
I would suggest instead it is the latest invocation of a known plan with predicted outcomes. Most likely simply incremental effort as part of the over arching plan.
But no theory as to what that plan is?
The majority of rhetoric used over the past 50+ years by the criminals, has been about population issues.
Initially predicting problems and more recently blaming any and all conceivable issues on the same.
So I think it is about energy and access reduction, reducing capability and density using a variety of methods.
This explains most of the moves made by the criminals that have sequestered power in a variety of ways via criminal enterprise and the mafia type of connectivity they operate with.
So. 95% of the batches are safe? We aren't all going to die after all in 2 weeks?
You need to read the actual paper.
But this is sample only from Denmark.
Pfizer jab was manufactured in at least 11 factories, all over the world.
This most likely contained batches from only a couple of them.
The data shows that all three companies had a small number of deadly batches. It wasn't limited to a specific manufacturer or facility
This info has been around for a few years now
Which three companies?
I am specifically referring to the actual manufacturing factories. Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, AZ - they are mere marketing arms. None of them did ANY manufacturing. All Manufacturing was outsourced to more than a dozen of different factories/sub-contractors.
The comment I wrote, was in reference to this paper:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/eci.13998
Which only contains Danish Medical Agency (DKMA) Serious Adverse Events data, so only for Denmark. As per DKMA data, the Pfizer BNT162b2 shots used in Denmark came from only few EU based factories manufacturing for Pfizer.
The earlier data you refer to, is an independent study is by Craig Paardekooper, and it was done purely on the US VAERS data, so only for the BNT162b2 batches manufacture in the US (and this does NOT included the DMED data, as military got their own specific Pfizer batches). This came out in October 2021, not "a few years ago".
And the above paper is the first published, peer-review data on the subject.
The Danish paper clearly demonstrates (with enough statistical power) that the deadly batches were not small (in medical production variation, 4.2% is not small, it's huge). 0.05% would have been small.
Perhaps you mean something else?