You are underestimating how destructively this can be utilized.
I did too. Transhumanism and AI was in many headlines a year or more ago and I casually dismissed it myself. I'm taking it more seriously now
Think about how dangerously a quantum computer can be in the hands of bad people. A computer that can brute force decrypt any kind of encryption. Suddenly all emails are hacked, everything online hacked, all bank accounts hacked. AI can imitate your voice, decrypt your passwords, imitate your face and mannerisms, your handwriting, your diction, imitate your patterns of behavior. Your fingerprint, social security number birthday everything is stored in a networked computer somewhere and a quantum computer can find it all in short time
AI is a smokescreen for a non-human "benevolent ruler" who has no bias.
In reality AI decisions will still be made by the same self serving corrupt elite, now just masqueraded as AI decisions .
There is no AI goal setting , sentience , awareness , agency or fairness - just ML weighted generative algos that can be distorted any which way the designers and trainers want.
Its just that with "Its done by AI" smokescreen the biases , actual rulers are now de-personified .
There is no longer a human, a group of evil rulers or cabal to blame and to attack, because it is all supposedly "AI".
"What is ELIZA in psychology?
ELIZA is a computer program that emulates a Rogerian psychotherapist. Just type your questions and concerns and hit return. Eliza will answer you. Talk to Eliza."
Research recently has shown that the chatbots have a distinct left-bias. This is because they are trained on dialog from all over the Internet, including left-wing writers. Because of that, someone has started a rightwing conservative chatbot project that may be more trustable.
That is true and it very much injects human bias, but the starting point of data is scanning the Internet indiscriminately, i.e. by pulling in things like Reddit chats, Washington Post propaganda pieces, and so on.
If you call ai non intelligent and youu consider this a conspiracy then I am ashamed to be in your presence In the city of moronville where you're the only occupant
INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand)
Consenting to stand under (intelligence) suggested (artificial) gives the power of consent to those shaping the suggestions. Ones consent represents the intelligence and what one consents to represents the artificial.
Natural doesn't make suggestions (it makes itself perceivable), nor does it require consent (it demands adaptation)...consenting to artificial (suggested) tempts one to ignore natural (perceivable).
a) what helps push AI more than dehumanizing others by suggesting them to be bots?
b) notice that I don't try to match patterns like "ELIZA", but try to express the original pattern (perceivable inspiration) underneath the imitation (suggested information). The many lack pattern recognition, because each one of them willingly ignores perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction).
You are underestimating how destructively this can be utilized.
I did too. Transhumanism and AI was in many headlines a year or more ago and I casually dismissed it myself. I'm taking it more seriously now
Think about how dangerously a quantum computer can be in the hands of bad people. A computer that can brute force decrypt any kind of encryption. Suddenly all emails are hacked, everything online hacked, all bank accounts hacked. AI can imitate your voice, decrypt your passwords, imitate your face and mannerisms, your handwriting, your diction, imitate your patterns of behavior. Your fingerprint, social security number birthday everything is stored in a networked computer somewhere and a quantum computer can find it all in short time
quantum computing and weather modification are already in the hands of the most evil people on the planet...
my evidence is the last 3 years....
Vote hard 2024...
AI simulates your fraudulent elections.
yep... Ai does not burn down cities and get away with it haha
AI is a smokescreen for a non-human "benevolent ruler" who has no bias.
In reality AI decisions will still be made by the same self serving corrupt elite, now just masqueraded as AI decisions .
There is no AI goal setting , sentience , awareness , agency or fairness - just ML weighted generative algos that can be distorted any which way the designers and trainers want.
Its just that with "Its done by AI" smokescreen the biases , actual rulers are now de-personified .
There is no longer a human, a group of evil rulers or cabal to blame and to attack, because it is all supposedly "AI".
Couldn't happen to a more deserving society. Bring it on.
When the Unibomber Incident occurred, Janet Reno announced that every single electronic comm was being combed for keywords using software.
Look at ELIZA's birthday. She's no spring chicken.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA
"What is ELIZA in psychology? ELIZA is a computer program that emulates a Rogerian psychotherapist. Just type your questions and concerns and hit return. Eliza will answer you. Talk to Eliza."
Getting 'Rogered' by your e-therapist.
Don't underestimate how weak of a system is actually needed to fuck shit up.
Finally somebody who gets it.
Research recently has shown that the chatbots have a distinct left-bias. This is because they are trained on dialog from all over the Internet, including left-wing writers. Because of that, someone has started a rightwing conservative chatbot project that may be more trustable.
?
Nope, it's because they utilize Human Reinforced Learning i.e. 100s of humans correcting the output during training
That is true and it very much injects human bias, but the starting point of data is scanning the Internet indiscriminately, i.e. by pulling in things like Reddit chats, Washington Post propaganda pieces, and so on.
If you call ai non intelligent and youu consider this a conspiracy then I am ashamed to be in your presence In the city of moronville where you're the only occupant
Consenting to stand under (intelligence) suggested (artificial) gives the power of consent to those shaping the suggestions. Ones consent represents the intelligence and what one consents to represents the artificial.
Natural doesn't make suggestions (it makes itself perceivable), nor does it require consent (it demands adaptation)...consenting to artificial (suggested) tempts one to ignore natural (perceivable).
That you, ELIZA? kek
a) what helps push AI more than dehumanizing others by suggesting them to be bots?
b) notice that I don't try to match patterns like "ELIZA", but try to express the original pattern (perceivable inspiration) underneath the imitation (suggested information). The many lack pattern recognition, because each one of them willingly ignores perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction).