The globalists only have one playbook and we've seen it action dozens of times now:
-
- Manufacturer the crisis.
-
- Use the MSM to create the outrage.
-
- Implement the "solution," which always consolidates their power.
-
- Memoryhole the scam.
In this case, creating a severe economic depression could provide the perfect opportunity to ban cash and mandate CBDC.
Nope. Not ready yet
I don’t see why not. They own every bank on Earth. They can do anything they please at any time.
They do not need to implement CBDC yet. The infrastructure is not ready. The public is not ready. They can take your money through inflation. It is easier and accepted because no one can realise this is what inflation is.
What infrastructure isn’t ready? The public will literally commit suicide if the media tells them to. They don’t need inflation or devaluation anymore.
Hmm. Do you have any evidence of this?
Not relevant. The ordinary man didn’t see vaccines as necessary to continuing to be allowed to remain alive, or go to work, or to leave his house… until he was explicitly told this by the media, just once.
The only thing a CBDC requires is the media telling people “Cash is now illegal. Go to the bank to get your CBDC card or you will starve to death.” and they will immediately comply.
This is so true and so sad but it gave me a chuckle so thank you lol
Heard it here first? Welcome to news from over a decade ago to anyone paying attention
Imagine being proud of being wrong for over a decade and counting. Lmao.
MSM will have to convince the masses that their money is vulnerable outside this new CBDC system.
They will convince the public that money in the bank is no longer money in the bank, that the only safe place is in a chip embedded in your wrist.
As far as I understand, first impulse for most people who will hear that their money is no longer safe in banks will be to withdraw cash from their accounts, not wait for CBDC.
Only way to stop that is to ban cash now. So, they will have to ban cash before implementing CBDC? And if they ban cash, then what will be the need for CBDC then? Bank account credentials could be perfectly stored in the same chip whithout any need for CBDC.
HThe banks don't have nearly enough cash on hand to actually handle a significant portion of people cashing out. This could cause them all to default, making people's existing accounts worthless. That is just one way to show cash is unsafe and get the people behind it. "Look, cattle, the banks couldn't handle keeping track of how much money they actually had... They will no longer have this problem with the new digital currency. It's like Bitcoin but you can buy everything from your favorite corporations who are conveniently all adopting this at the same time"
...
...
It's like some brick wall. How, please, explain me you produce such sequence?
Banks don't have cash, but it is cash that unsafe, not banks.
I could believe that insane elites could somehow push that narrative, but there is no way they will succeed. Even sheeple will not agree with such thought flow. If you don't give a donut to a sheeple, it is not a donut that bad, it's you who do not give it to sheeple. They could swallow cash ban for whatever reason, say for democracy and freedom, I think, but will never accept the idea that donuts they do not receive are bad or cash thay can't withdraw is unsafe. They will always guilt those who have to give them wanted donut or cash.
To make that happen there should be narrative that cash is bad in principle. Then, sheeple could accept that cash is bad and stop wanting it. But if they still want it, this will not work.
IDK how to explain better - if sheeple think that he need cash and bank did not give him cash, it will be unsafe bank, not cash. So they have to convince sheeple that cash is unsafe in the first place and only then do bank runs or whatever. Not in reverse order - use bank runs as a proof that cash is unsafe.
It is like elites run before the locomotive. Doing things in wrong order.
I disagree that they could not succeed in such a narrative. They've succeeded in pushing illogical narratives for a very long time. The idea would be cash is bad because the banks can't keep track of it and bad people do bad things but that won't happen if the government is in charge.
Will they do it, who knows, but it's certainly not above them to try or above society at large to accept it
When it comes to things sheeple want, they are pretty logical. If sheeple want mask, it will kill for it. If sheeple want cash it will kill for it too.
Again, to do what you supose they first need to push a narrative that cash is not safe, and only then ban it or do that things with banks not giving cash. While sheeple want cash it is insane to try to not give it for them.
"Cash is bad" first, "We don't giving you cash anymore" then. Not otherwise.
How that could be not clear?
Yes but how did they come to want masks? It wasn't through logic. Likewise they don't necessarily want cash but they want things cash can get them. When cash can't do those things anymore they'll happily accept whatever will
Obviously by propaganda. But that propaganda was first, only then comes sheeple desire. Propaganda first, desire then. Sequence in another order will not work even on sheeple.
They have to be propagandised first about unsafety of cash, then they will agree that cash is unsafe and should be replaced by CBDC or not given out by banks. They will not think that cash is unsafe because banks don't want give it to them. They obviously will think that banks is unsafe to keep their money. And "money" are associated with cash among sheeple for now. Funny, but sheeple really think that it is real cash kept somwhere in bank and when they use their card they spend their cash that is stored in bank.
So, there should be propaganda among sellers to not to accept cash first. Not that not giving cash by banks.
While sellers accept cash (money in sheeple mind), banks that don't give sheeple cash are unsafe, not cash.
Bank runs alone in no way could convince sheeple that cash is unsafe. Only thing sheeple will be convinced is that banks are unsafe.
Many sheeple don't use cash for a long time. Phone app connected to card account is more than enough for them. But when they see that there is a shortage of cash - they run for it, just because everybody run. Just like with toilet paper.
If I want to get rid of cash, I'll just make it freely available at any amount, but uncomfortable to use, say, print only $100 banknotes and collect all old banknotes of lower value. So, if some sheeple will want to use cash he will get a problem with change. Cash is here, nobody limit sheeple with it, but it is very annoying to carry a tons of coins as change. So, there will be no any cash deficit, that drives sheeple to rush obtaining, but sheeple will completely stop to use it, willingly by their own decision. And then, nobody will care about cash ban at all, since it is already unuseable and so not necessary. Simple as fuck, and no even need for propaganda.
So, no I don't think bank runs is a way of banning cash. I think it is just another fuckup of elites, nothing more.
Exactly. They tried to do it during coronahoax (you could contract illness through banknotes!!!), but for whatever reason drop that narrative soon, so everything about cash returned to regular state. And now I'm not aware about any other attempts to push any narrative to discredit cash. And bank runs is definitely not one of them. Will be interesting to see how they will do that.
Any way to foil their plan?