The globalists only have one playbook and we've seen it action dozens of times now:
-
- Manufacturer the crisis.
-
- Use the MSM to create the outrage.
-
- Implement the "solution," which always consolidates their power.
-
- Memoryhole the scam.
In this case, creating a severe economic depression could provide the perfect opportunity to ban cash and mandate CBDC.
I disagree that they could not succeed in such a narrative. They've succeeded in pushing illogical narratives for a very long time. The idea would be cash is bad because the banks can't keep track of it and bad people do bad things but that won't happen if the government is in charge.
Will they do it, who knows, but it's certainly not above them to try or above society at large to accept it
When it comes to things sheeple want, they are pretty logical. If sheeple want mask, it will kill for it. If sheeple want cash it will kill for it too.
Again, to do what you supose they first need to push a narrative that cash is not safe, and only then ban it or do that things with banks not giving cash. While sheeple want cash it is insane to try to not give it for them.
"Cash is bad" first, "We don't giving you cash anymore" then. Not otherwise.
How that could be not clear?
Yes but how did they come to want masks? It wasn't through logic. Likewise they don't necessarily want cash but they want things cash can get them. When cash can't do those things anymore they'll happily accept whatever will
Obviously by propaganda. But that propaganda was first, only then comes sheeple desire. Propaganda first, desire then. Sequence in another order will not work even on sheeple.
They have to be propagandised first about unsafety of cash, then they will agree that cash is unsafe and should be replaced by CBDC or not given out by banks. They will not think that cash is unsafe because banks don't want give it to them. They obviously will think that banks is unsafe to keep their money. And "money" are associated with cash among sheeple for now. Funny, but sheeple really think that it is real cash kept somwhere in bank and when they use their card they spend their cash that is stored in bank.
So, there should be propaganda among sellers to not to accept cash first. Not that not giving cash by banks.
While sellers accept cash (money in sheeple mind), banks that don't give sheeple cash are unsafe, not cash.
Bank runs alone in no way could convince sheeple that cash is unsafe. Only thing sheeple will be convinced is that banks are unsafe.
Many sheeple don't use cash for a long time. Phone app connected to card account is more than enough for them. But when they see that there is a shortage of cash - they run for it, just because everybody run. Just like with toilet paper.
If I want to get rid of cash, I'll just make it freely available at any amount, but uncomfortable to use, say, print only $100 banknotes and collect all old banknotes of lower value. So, if some sheeple will want to use cash he will get a problem with change. Cash is here, nobody limit sheeple with it, but it is very annoying to carry a tons of coins as change. So, there will be no any cash deficit, that drives sheeple to rush obtaining, but sheeple will completely stop to use it, willingly by their own decision. And then, nobody will care about cash ban at all, since it is already unuseable and so not necessary. Simple as fuck, and no even need for propaganda.
So, no I don't think bank runs is a way of banning cash. I think it is just another fuckup of elites, nothing more.
It would not be the bank runs alone. Perhaps that's where our disconnect is and maybe I was not clear if that's the case my apologies