The globalists only have one playbook and we've seen it action dozens of times now:
-
- Manufacturer the crisis.
-
- Use the MSM to create the outrage.
-
- Implement the "solution," which always consolidates their power.
-
- Memoryhole the scam.
In this case, creating a severe economic depression could provide the perfect opportunity to ban cash and mandate CBDC.
HThe banks don't have nearly enough cash on hand to actually handle a significant portion of people cashing out. This could cause them all to default, making people's existing accounts worthless. That is just one way to show cash is unsafe and get the people behind it. "Look, cattle, the banks couldn't handle keeping track of how much money they actually had... They will no longer have this problem with the new digital currency. It's like Bitcoin but you can buy everything from your favorite corporations who are conveniently all adopting this at the same time"
...
...
It's like some brick wall. How, please, explain me you produce such sequence?
Banks don't have cash, but it is cash that unsafe, not banks.
I could believe that insane elites could somehow push that narrative, but there is no way they will succeed. Even sheeple will not agree with such thought flow. If you don't give a donut to a sheeple, it is not a donut that bad, it's you who do not give it to sheeple. They could swallow cash ban for whatever reason, say for democracy and freedom, I think, but will never accept the idea that donuts they do not receive are bad or cash thay can't withdraw is unsafe. They will always guilt those who have to give them wanted donut or cash.
To make that happen there should be narrative that cash is bad in principle. Then, sheeple could accept that cash is bad and stop wanting it. But if they still want it, this will not work.
IDK how to explain better - if sheeple think that he need cash and bank did not give him cash, it will be unsafe bank, not cash. So they have to convince sheeple that cash is unsafe in the first place and only then do bank runs or whatever. Not in reverse order - use bank runs as a proof that cash is unsafe.
It is like elites run before the locomotive. Doing things in wrong order.
I disagree that they could not succeed in such a narrative. They've succeeded in pushing illogical narratives for a very long time. The idea would be cash is bad because the banks can't keep track of it and bad people do bad things but that won't happen if the government is in charge.
Will they do it, who knows, but it's certainly not above them to try or above society at large to accept it
When it comes to things sheeple want, they are pretty logical. If sheeple want mask, it will kill for it. If sheeple want cash it will kill for it too.
Again, to do what you supose they first need to push a narrative that cash is not safe, and only then ban it or do that things with banks not giving cash. While sheeple want cash it is insane to try to not give it for them.
"Cash is bad" first, "We don't giving you cash anymore" then. Not otherwise.
How that could be not clear?
Yes but how did they come to want masks? It wasn't through logic. Likewise they don't necessarily want cash but they want things cash can get them. When cash can't do those things anymore they'll happily accept whatever will
Exactly. They tried to do it during coronahoax (you could contract illness through banknotes!!!), but for whatever reason drop that narrative soon, so everything about cash returned to regular state. And now I'm not aware about any other attempts to push any narrative to discredit cash. And bank runs is definitely not one of them. Will be interesting to see how they will do that.