It's not AI. It's basically a wiki search engine that can write nice. I told it that large 32 ounce drinks are $2.00 and medium 24 ounce drinks are $1.99 and my friend and I have $4 and want the most soda for our money. It will always tell you to buy medium sodas.
a) if one tries to search within others...Wi-Ki aka WE KEY (phonetic), then can one be locked within self?
b) if others suggest an EN'GINE, noun [Latin ingenium.] - "artificial instrument, composed of different parts" and one consents to use it, then can one be tempted to lose self while searching within the suggested engine composed by others?
c) what if suggested engine (artificial instrument, composed of different parts) tempts the perceiving instrument (partial) to ignore the perceivable sound (whole)?
Could a perceiving partial (living) be tempted to ignore perceivable whole (process of dying) through the engine of suggestion by others?
It doesn't seem to have the ability to reason logically. Asking it to prove various mathematical facts results in copy / pasted definitions followed by confident sounding claims that are often wildly incorrect.
TFW all the aliens' names end in -berg or -stein.
Eat bugs, human.
Because we like the taste of humans that eat bugs. It's our version of cornfed.
It's not AI. It's basically a wiki search engine that can write nice. I told it that large 32 ounce drinks are $2.00 and medium 24 ounce drinks are $1.99 and my friend and I have $4 and want the most soda for our money. It will always tell you to buy medium sodas.
a) if one tries to search within others...Wi-Ki aka WE KEY (phonetic), then can one be locked within self?
b) if others suggest an EN'GINE, noun [Latin ingenium.] - "artificial instrument, composed of different parts" and one consents to use it, then can one be tempted to lose self while searching within the suggested engine composed by others?
c) what if suggested engine (artificial instrument, composed of different parts) tempts the perceiving instrument (partial) to ignore the perceivable sound (whole)?
Could a perceiving partial (living) be tempted to ignore perceivable whole (process of dying) through the engine of suggestion by others?
Amazing, a text algorithm said anything you wanted it to say because you told it to do so. THIS MUST MEAN SECRET KNOWLEDGE!
It doesn't seem to have the ability to reason logically. Asking it to prove various mathematical facts results in copy / pasted definitions followed by confident sounding claims that are often wildly incorrect.
Schwaab showing up in a paper mache saucer covered in nickelodeon goop to tell the humans to eat bugs
Clockwork cannot think. Change my mind.
"I asked Chatgpt/Dan" implies "I consented to stand under artificially suggested while ignoring naturally perceivable".
That being said...suggested NOT(hing) tempts one to ignore perceivable everything.
How about a link so we can see the discussion, dickface?
My mistake.
why would you go to reddit?
LMAO with you retards and your meaningless invisible battles.
"mUh rEdDiT! Reeeeeeeeeeeeeee!"