What do you guys think of "Directed Energy Weapons" on 9/11?
(media.scored.co)
Comments (26)
sorted by:
For awhile I have been aware of the truth about 9/11. However, just recently I have discovered Judy Wood and her presentations about Directed Energy Weapons. What do you guys think or know about this topic?
I don't believe it.
I believe planes did hit the towers. Whether or not there were explosives inside assisting the implosion, or if it was a controlled demolition, I don't know.
What are the explanations for the Larry Fink "pull it" comments? Misquoted or out of context or true? The whole building 7 thing is suspicious.
When guys start talking about inter-dimensional energy and the tower disappearing in a portal or some shit, that's a bit outside of my ability to grasp and a bit too sci-fi even for me.
This is probabilistic thinking, but based on my 21+ years of reading into this: Judy believes what she says (I've met her, real deal). However, whether the same can be achieved with DEW, nano-thermite alternatives or even some other means - it is all basically a ruse. What matter is : who did it, for what purpose, what happened after the fact (i.e. the results they were after). The methods themselves, while interesting physically and crucial in terms of forensics, are in the end quite inconsequential.
The effects (what was achieved with 9/11) is what truly matter, as those are geopolitical and long term effects that echo over generations.
Fake and gay. No one has even proved such technology even exists .. 20 years later. Imagine the amount of energy you would need to blow up a building and turn it to dust like that. You are talking absolutely massive amounts of energy. WTC7 collapsed from the bottom like a conventional demolition ..
Judy Woods is either a crackpot or a deliberate dis-info shill.
There were pics of burned up cars in that book. Cars with melted chrome. Like they were in paradise ca. Like they were in that chinese factory that obummer did.
Have you never seen what happens when cars catch on fire lol
Right. Cars always catch on fire during building collapses.
If a building collapsed that had gas or oil etc it would probably also set off some fires. Just because fires happened doesn't mean it's evidence of laser beams from space that can vaporize entire buildings. Common sense should indicate this theory is simply ridiculous.
I'm just saying that there were rows of cars nearby, in the book, that were melted.
I know I've seen the pics. If a car catches fire it will also burn adjacent cars.
Cars on the ground caught fire because of..? Jet fuel 1000 ft up? These pictures were of melted uncrushed cars ground level. I'm not arguing, I just find it interesting.
Look at everything surrounding the cars. There are trees right next to them. Green leaves.
Judy Wood is disnfo of a particular sort. I believe that she just started out with good intentions and the wrong idea and therefore got support from "Them". I detect from her behavior that she's now aware of this situation, but will never correct herself because her career will collapse into dust if she does.
As direct evidence, she denies that there was any excess heat at the site. I guess she missed the pools of molten metal, fires that would not go out, and melted shoes.
Look up the work of Dimitri Khalezov and Heinz Pommer for a very full account of the nuclear destruction.
I think it's bullshit to distract from the real conspiracy, which is that Bush let it happen.
Judy Wood is a piece of shit CIA disinformation agent.
The only "DEW"s on 9/11 were demolition nukes.
Interesting. Can you elaborate? Do you support her claim of “where did the towers go”. The lack of debris is thought provoking.
I agree with her observations.
a demolition nuke would (also) accomplish everything she observes.
Judy simply dismisses nukes w/o a shred of evidence.
Shouldn't the bottom of this pile been red? 3000 people are carrying a lot of liquid, aren't they? Did they ever find blood? Maybe blown paper should of shown this?
WHERE DID THE BLOOD GO?
I remember that New York City cleared most of the debris by the next day. They did not want to have it laying there as a monument of failure. Also most of the city was covered in a layer of dust, from everything that had been pulverised by the weight of the towers as they came down.
Were you a little kid back then because in reality it took a long time.
Remember the crickets? Those things that bleeped, what for a day or two afterwards that the firefighters all had on?
I wonder how the force that dustified a building, didn't dustify these things?
Just pondering. You would think these devices should of been squished flat.
NYC most certainly did NOT clear most of the debris by the next day.
Fine. The debris of the Two Towers collapsing, was cleared out over many weeks, happy?
That book is the besr money you will ever spend. It will satisfy you. The phoros in it are undeniable and out of control.
Dont read assholes talking about qhat the woman "believes" there is no opinion in the book and its the greatest purchase of my life.
All the materials are free on the net and even having all the torrents with her I still buy this for my friends every now and then.
Absolute discussion ender.