Any college genetics or molecular bio course will cover this. Also, there is not 1 genome for COVID there are millions of different genomes. Counting the As in the poly-A tail is notoriously hard. Different reads of the same sample will give different numbers.
Generally, I'm talking about the SARS-CoV-2 genome.
27202..27387 is the base number range, like a page number, of where in the RNA I'm talking about.
ORF6 is the name of that section of RNA, called a gene, and/or the name of the hypothetical protein it would build. ORF I think means Open Reading Frame.
The letters are the amino acids that come together, in order, to make that protein. I threw it in for easier Copy/Paste should I ever need to search Google for it or anything.
‐-----------------
And when you look online you can find literature about ORF6 interacting/ plugging in with human nucleopores. Nucleopores being the little doorways that regulate access to and from the nucleus.
What my assertion is, is that a mutated bat virus shouldn't (couldn't?) have the molecule that unlocks human nucleopores.
Coronavirus is a very efficiently built disease, with only 10 genes and almost no junk DNA between the genes. It doesn't look wild to me.
Thank you very much for this. I used to follow more info about people investigating the actual virus and what isn't be said about it but that got lost in the noise over vaccines debates and arguments over disinformation.
It does not look at all like a fuse. That the end of the genome is going to decay after a time triggering something after the replication has resulted in the tail being cut.
If one part is fake, everything is fake. If this isn't the real genome, there is no reason to discuss it at all.
But if it is real, inserting a tail in the genome is like setting up a fuse. When you copy genetic information, it's 99.99%. Then, eventually it becomes 99.98%. Once you copy it enough times, the tail is gonna be cut off and the end-sequence is gonna trigger. There are some people talking about this kind of mechanism being present in the human and mammal genome with the ribosome-tail. Once the genetic information has been copied enough times, people die. Incubation-time can make viruses more devastating. An extra timer in addition to this would be a very bad thing.
Exactly. Accounts are out here shilling hard for the man made virus red herring. There is NO VIRUS only a computer model. Not ONE sample of an isolated and purified "virion" of "sars cov 2" has been produced in all these YEARS now.. because both stories are red herrings.
you’re a bot because you posted truth that I can’t refute
you’re a bot because truth hurts my feelings
you’re a bot because I have no argument against what you said
you’re a bot because I have no refutation for what you said
you’re a bot because I don’t like what you said
you’re a bot because you say things bots are forbidden from saying
you’re a bot because I am too weak and cowardly to accept reality
Best you can do, huh? Fuck off, coward. Can’t even reply to me directly.
The other half of his comments are like "go do a violence!”
Try again without a strawman.
hours of research on oddly specific Chinese Navy vs US Navy capabilities with quotes, but as a nearly instant comment reply
WOW! I COPIED AND PASTED SOMETHING I HAD ALREADY WRITTEN, RATHER THAN WASTING MY TIME GIVING SOME RETARD BRAND NEW FORMATTED TEXT! CLEARLY I’M A BOT! NO ONE HAS EVER QUOTED ANYTHING ANYONE HAS EVER PREVIOUSLY WRITTEN BEFORE!
Everyone but TallestSkil is allowed to comment here.
CRY THE FUCK HARDER, YOU STUPID ILLITERATE BITCH. I AM LITERALLY AGREEING WITH YOU IN THAT COMMENT, DUMBASS.
The virus is already proven to have been manmade (rather, man-altered, because we can’t just create cells out of nothing). What it isn’t is a “signature” of any particular group doing it, because biochemistry just doesn’t work that way.
The virus is already proven to have been manmade (rather, man-altered, because we can’t just create cells out of nothing). What it isn’t is a “signature” of any particular group doing it, because biochemistry just doesn’t work that way.
It's because it is FAKE. What you keep babbling about is not a real sample of a virion of "Sars Cov 2", not ONE sample exists. You are looking at an In Silico genomic sequence, AKA a computer model of "sars cov 2". Because it is FAKE and not a virus that is getting people sick.
I was making a joke on this, stretching the analogy between computer coders doing things that seem to make no sense until you understand why they did it, and genetic coding. Although, when I ran minority DNA into my Commodore 64, it played the game Doom and aliens invaded the Mars outpost.
THIS.
Any college genetics or molecular bio course will cover this. Also, there is not 1 genome for COVID there are millions of different genomes. Counting the As in the poly-A tail is notoriously hard. Different reads of the same sample will give different numbers.
Gene 27202..27387, ORF6
MFHLVDFQVTIAEILLIIMRTFKVSIWNLDYIINLIIKNLSKSLTENKYSQLDEEQPMEID
Isn't this proof that it enters the cell nucleus? I thought that was one of the explicit lies they told, that it's not getting into your DNA.
Weird for Chinese bats to have the exact key to unlock human cell's nucleus pores...
Four highly effective immunosuppressive genes and no filler. Just danger wrapped up in a delivery vehicle.
I'm fully convinced this is a lab-grade bioweapon and suspicious that it was probably designed by an AI algorithm.
Could you elaborate on what you are talking about here and what those letters mean?
Generally, I'm talking about the SARS-CoV-2 genome.
27202..27387 is the base number range, like a page number, of where in the RNA I'm talking about.
ORF6 is the name of that section of RNA, called a gene, and/or the name of the hypothetical protein it would build. ORF I think means Open Reading Frame.
The letters are the amino acids that come together, in order, to make that protein. I threw it in for easier Copy/Paste should I ever need to search Google for it or anything.
‐-----------------
And when you look online you can find literature about ORF6 interacting/ plugging in with human nucleopores. Nucleopores being the little doorways that regulate access to and from the nucleus.
What my assertion is, is that a mutated bat virus shouldn't (couldn't?) have the molecule that unlocks human nucleopores.
Coronavirus is a very efficiently built disease, with only 10 genes and almost no junk DNA between the genes. It doesn't look wild to me.
Thank you very much for this. I used to follow more info about people investigating the actual virus and what isn't be said about it but that got lost in the noise over vaccines debates and arguments over disinformation.
It does not look at all like a fuse. That the end of the genome is going to decay after a time triggering something after the replication has resulted in the tail being cut.
If one part is fake, everything is fake. If this isn't the real genome, there is no reason to discuss it at all.
But if it is real, inserting a tail in the genome is like setting up a fuse. When you copy genetic information, it's 99.99%. Then, eventually it becomes 99.98%. Once you copy it enough times, the tail is gonna be cut off and the end-sequence is gonna trigger. There are some people talking about this kind of mechanism being present in the human and mammal genome with the ribosome-tail. Once the genetic information has been copied enough times, people die. Incubation-time can make viruses more devastating. An extra timer in addition to this would be a very bad thing.
Could you give the terminal 33 bases of any other virus for comparison?
It's not lab-grown; it only exists as a computer model.
Exactly. Accounts are out here shilling hard for the man made virus red herring. There is NO VIRUS only a computer model. Not ONE sample of an isolated and purified "virion" of "sars cov 2" has been produced in all these YEARS now.. because both stories are red herrings.
I haven't seen the tech on nano-3D printers that would assemble nucleic acids in a specific order. Would love a link.
And that's not synthesizing something material from a computer model, but pretty interesting.
OK, now THAT is possibly synthesizing something material from a computer model. I'll take a look, and thanks for the links.
Drink bleach, you fucking subhuman kike.
Best you can do, huh? Fuck off, coward. Can’t even reply to me directly.
Try again without a strawman.
WOW! I COPIED AND PASTED SOMETHING I HAD ALREADY WRITTEN, RATHER THAN WASTING MY TIME GIVING SOME RETARD BRAND NEW FORMATTED TEXT! CLEARLY I’M A BOT! NO ONE HAS EVER QUOTED ANYTHING ANYONE HAS EVER PREVIOUSLY WRITTEN BEFORE!
Fuck off, dipshit.
CRY THE FUCK HARDER, YOU STUPID ILLITERATE BITCH. I AM LITERALLY AGREEING WITH YOU IN THAT COMMENT, DUMBASS.
The virus is already proven to have been manmade (rather, man-altered, because we can’t just create cells out of nothing). What it isn’t is a “signature” of any particular group doing it, because biochemistry just doesn’t work that way.
Stop yelling, nigger
No.
The virus is already proven to have been manmade (rather, man-altered, because we can’t just create cells out of nothing). What it isn’t is a “signature” of any particular group doing it, because biochemistry just doesn’t work that way.
It's because it is FAKE. What you keep babbling about is not a real sample of a virion of "Sars Cov 2", not ONE sample exists. You are looking at an In Silico genomic sequence, AKA a computer model of "sars cov 2". Because it is FAKE and not a virus that is getting people sick.
Drink bleach.
Genomes don't evolve by flipping coins you utter retard.
Er, it's zero-padding by some C coder.
I was making a joke on this, stretching the analogy between computer coders doing things that seem to make no sense until you understand why they did it, and genetic coding. Although, when I ran minority DNA into my Commodore 64, it played the game Doom and aliens invaded the Mars outpost.
33 degrees of virality
Kek. Kill all fagmasons