I guess I would just have this to say to everyone who has felt like a sheep that has realized what was going on, jumped the fence, and ran off the farm towards the smiling face and into the waiting arms of the guy next door: that rancher may not be your friend.
Like, maybe the first rancher might have even thought of that beforehand.
Imagine life in a cave system, where generation upon generation you have consistent implementation and no opportunity to change course.
This describes much of aboriginal life, where the goal is to continue the existing process; without change.
The desire to suppress innovation in my opinion comes from fear, the propagation of fear has always been the control mechanism used against people and some are able to push past it while many cannot.
When it comes to moving to and fro between control systems / groups it is natural to want for a better situation and also normal to be mislead by the shine.
The process of dying establishes existence (living) within change.
no opportunity to change course
Temporary opportunity (choice) can only exist within the momentum (balance) of ongoing change.
When it comes to moving to and fro between control systems / groups it is natural to want for a better situation
Ones (singular) consent to suggested groups (plural) tempts one into the controlled situation called "reason" aka perceivable singular wanting vs not wanting suggested plural.
One cannot be a plural, since plural (whole process of dying) generates each singular (partial living) through self differentiation, yet one has the free will of choice to ignore this for whatever others are suggesting.
it is natural to want
Nature represents the ongoing need, those within represent the temporary want, struggling to sustain self within ongoing need, while resisting the temptation of want. The few exploit the ignorance of the many towards need by tempting them into a want vs not want conflict of reason through suggested information.
to be mislead
The natural order leads from inception towards death...living within implies the need to resist being lead towards death. Others suggest one to follow artificial orders, while willingly ignoring to resist the natural order.
Now question suggested LEAD, verb - "to guide towards" with perceivable...living doesn't imply following towards, it demands resisting origin as reactors (living) within generation (process of dying).
Seth Dillon is an Ashkenazi Zionist that came out of nowhere and bought the Babylon Bee from Adam Ford.
Some point out they often do that, become crypto jews and use their fiat paper scam to buy everyone out and infiltrate, then sabotage from within (thousands became Christian pastors and priests back in the 1930's to then push Marxism/liberalism).
It seems almost like it's in their DNA to start rubbing their hands together and dreaming of White genocide. Even the ones who might not be in on any plan, for some reason all obsess over "we must race mix Whites out of existence to then have world peace."
As if the mere existence of White people causes other races to envy.
Seems the best way to fix "racism" is for each race to have their own nation, not mix everyone together in the first place (talmudists though, want to mongrelize the world, then rule over it all).
I agree about the crypto Jews point. But it's not like creating a nation of different races is unique to Jews. White people created the New World as it is today, and made it mixed. Not Jews (they just tagged along and profited).
Bs they did not. They may have been fools for taking part in it but the new world order has been planned a very long time and not by white people. There’s even a book about it from the 1930’s .... something about some kind of Utopia....
There is nothing wrong with mixing or not mixing races IMO up to the person. However, intentionally replacing a race or intentionally destroying western society to usher in the NWO is obviously wrong. The only way the new world order wins and their utopia can take place would be destroying the western world. Even in Higger’s book he says that the west will be destroyed by invaders. Pretty much everything we see taking place can be found there. While they see it as prophecy I see it as intentional manipulating people to make these events happen. There is a part where it mentions that the sun will be blacked out... hmm... It’s also said the world will be divided by the righteous and the wicked...only these two. I believe we are being pushed hard propaganda to see the left as wicked / dehumanize them / every evil story highlighted / the left is being set up for their doom. Higger says that the wicked will completely disappear from the earth and be destroyed. Is this why it seems that the left is killing its own with injections? Even more were we pushed info intentionally not to take it? Higger says the wicked that are left in the world will “own nothing” and the righteous will “own everything.” While I find my self thinking gosh it would be wonderful if the “wicked” didn’t exist... it’s not as simple as that... what we should be mad about is the intentional manipulation of not so smart people and mentally ill people to become what the left have become. Is this the playbook taking place? IDK but sure seems like it.
There is nothing wrong with multi ethnic countries imo as long as they are united which America used to be in that we were all Americans....sure it wasn’t perfect but the 80’s and 90’s early 2000’s were pretty great over all. The explosion of Muslims in western society for sure is intentional and not just normal “let’s mix cultures.” It is intentional because they know Islam is incompatible with the western world. The invasion of drug traffickers, criminals and people traffickers through our borders is intentional as well. So is letting out criminals and defunding the police. White people are not behind this except ignorant bleeding heart easily manipulated liberal pawns they use. They want people so desperate that we accept this utopia and want the wicked destroyed as well. I think it’s all by design.
White people created nations with a mix of races in them. They also mixed races via intermarriage in every country they conquered including the USA where early settlers were mixing with Native Americans.
And looking beyond the USA it is undeniable the mixing white people created on these two New World continents. Mexico. Brazil. Peru. Venezeula. Etc. They first created nations comprised of a mix of different races and then intermarried. And no evidence of a Jewish plot for that.
Whites (like all empire builders) showed no desire to create nations on strict racial lines. In nearly every place they conquered they created multi ethnic nations where they could exploit the natives.
I guess I would just have this to say to everyone who has felt like a sheep that has realized what was going on, jumped the fence, and ran off the farm towards the smiling face and into the waiting arms of the guy next door: that rancher may not be your friend.
Like, maybe the first rancher might have even thought of that beforehand.
Imagine life in a cave system, where generation upon generation you have consistent implementation and no opportunity to change course.
This describes much of aboriginal life, where the goal is to continue the existing process; without change.
The desire to suppress innovation in my opinion comes from fear, the propagation of fear has always been the control mechanism used against people and some are able to push past it while many cannot.
When it comes to moving to and fro between control systems / groups it is natural to want for a better situation and also normal to be mislead by the shine.
The process of dying establishes existence (living) within change.
Temporary opportunity (choice) can only exist within the momentum (balance) of ongoing change.
Ones (singular) consent to suggested groups (plural) tempts one into the controlled situation called "reason" aka perceivable singular wanting vs not wanting suggested plural.
One cannot be a plural, since plural (whole process of dying) generates each singular (partial living) through self differentiation, yet one has the free will of choice to ignore this for whatever others are suggesting.
Nature represents the ongoing need, those within represent the temporary want, struggling to sustain self within ongoing need, while resisting the temptation of want. The few exploit the ignorance of the many towards need by tempting them into a want vs not want conflict of reason through suggested information.
The natural order leads from inception towards death...living within implies the need to resist being lead towards death. Others suggest one to follow artificial orders, while willingly ignoring to resist the natural order.
Now question suggested LEAD, verb - "to guide towards" with perceivable...living doesn't imply following towards, it demands resisting origin as reactors (living) within generation (process of dying).
This is a great analogy.
Thanks very much!
Spoken like someone who can't get a girl unless she's forced into it.
He also said this, that he doesn't support that but is trolling Fuentes supporters https://twitter.com/JoelWBerry/status/1619370829510512640
But if he is serious about being a Zionist, that is pretty gay.
Seth Dillon is an Ashkenazi Zionist that came out of nowhere and bought the Babylon Bee from Adam Ford.
Some point out they often do that, become crypto jews and use their fiat paper scam to buy everyone out and infiltrate, then sabotage from within (thousands became Christian pastors and priests back in the 1930's to then push Marxism/liberalism).
It seems almost like it's in their DNA to start rubbing their hands together and dreaming of White genocide. Even the ones who might not be in on any plan, for some reason all obsess over "we must race mix Whites out of existence to then have world peace."
As if the mere existence of White people causes other races to envy.
Seems the best way to fix "racism" is for each race to have their own nation, not mix everyone together in the first place (talmudists though, want to mongrelize the world, then rule over it all).
I agree about the crypto Jews point. But it's not like creating a nation of different races is unique to Jews. White people created the New World as it is today, and made it mixed. Not Jews (they just tagged along and profited).
Bs they did not. They may have been fools for taking part in it but the new world order has been planned a very long time and not by white people. There’s even a book about it from the 1930’s .... something about some kind of Utopia.... There is nothing wrong with mixing or not mixing races IMO up to the person. However, intentionally replacing a race or intentionally destroying western society to usher in the NWO is obviously wrong. The only way the new world order wins and their utopia can take place would be destroying the western world. Even in Higger’s book he says that the west will be destroyed by invaders. Pretty much everything we see taking place can be found there. While they see it as prophecy I see it as intentional manipulating people to make these events happen. There is a part where it mentions that the sun will be blacked out... hmm... It’s also said the world will be divided by the righteous and the wicked...only these two. I believe we are being pushed hard propaganda to see the left as wicked / dehumanize them / every evil story highlighted / the left is being set up for their doom. Higger says that the wicked will completely disappear from the earth and be destroyed. Is this why it seems that the left is killing its own with injections? Even more were we pushed info intentionally not to take it? Higger says the wicked that are left in the world will “own nothing” and the righteous will “own everything.” While I find my self thinking gosh it would be wonderful if the “wicked” didn’t exist... it’s not as simple as that... what we should be mad about is the intentional manipulation of not so smart people and mentally ill people to become what the left have become. Is this the playbook taking place? IDK but sure seems like it.
I'm not saying Jews don't use weaponized migration / invasion. They do.
I'm talking about the New World (the Americas) not the New World Order. Europeans conquered lands and created multi ethnic nations in the Americas.
There is nothing wrong with multi ethnic countries imo as long as they are united which America used to be in that we were all Americans....sure it wasn’t perfect but the 80’s and 90’s early 2000’s were pretty great over all. The explosion of Muslims in western society for sure is intentional and not just normal “let’s mix cultures.” It is intentional because they know Islam is incompatible with the western world. The invasion of drug traffickers, criminals and people traffickers through our borders is intentional as well. So is letting out criminals and defunding the police. White people are not behind this except ignorant bleeding heart easily manipulated liberal pawns they use. They want people so desperate that we accept this utopia and want the wicked destroyed as well. I think it’s all by design.
White people created nations with a mix of races in them. They also mixed races via intermarriage in every country they conquered including the USA where early settlers were mixing with Native Americans.
And looking beyond the USA it is undeniable the mixing white people created on these two New World continents. Mexico. Brazil. Peru. Venezeula. Etc. They first created nations comprised of a mix of different races and then intermarried. And no evidence of a Jewish plot for that.
Whites (like all empire builders) showed no desire to create nations on strict racial lines. In nearly every place they conquered they created multi ethnic nations where they could exploit the natives.
Question:
What came first...e pluribus unum (out of many; one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together)?
Answer:
Nature setting itself apart from whole (process of dying) into each partial (living).
Super funny comments in that thread, good laughs.
point taken
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iCdtuQns9dY