I guess I would just have this to say to everyone who has felt like a sheep that has realized what was going on, jumped the fence, and ran off the farm towards the smiling face and into the waiting arms of the guy next door: that rancher may not be your friend.
Like, maybe the first rancher might have even thought of that beforehand.
Imagine life in a cave system, where generation upon generation you have consistent implementation and no opportunity to change course.
This describes much of aboriginal life, where the goal is to continue the existing process; without change.
The desire to suppress innovation in my opinion comes from fear, the propagation of fear has always been the control mechanism used against people and some are able to push past it while many cannot.
When it comes to moving to and fro between control systems / groups it is natural to want for a better situation and also normal to be mislead by the shine.
The process of dying establishes existence (living) within change.
no opportunity to change course
Temporary opportunity (choice) can only exist within the momentum (balance) of ongoing change.
When it comes to moving to and fro between control systems / groups it is natural to want for a better situation
Ones (singular) consent to suggested groups (plural) tempts one into the controlled situation called "reason" aka perceivable singular wanting vs not wanting suggested plural.
One cannot be a plural, since plural (whole process of dying) generates each singular (partial living) through self differentiation, yet one has the free will of choice to ignore this for whatever others are suggesting.
it is natural to want
Nature represents the ongoing need, those within represent the temporary want, struggling to sustain self within ongoing need, while resisting the temptation of want. The few exploit the ignorance of the many towards need by tempting them into a want vs not want conflict of reason through suggested information.
to be mislead
The natural order leads from inception towards death...living within implies the need to resist being lead towards death. Others suggest one to follow artificial orders, while willingly ignoring to resist the natural order.
Now question suggested LEAD, verb - "to guide towards" with perceivable...living doesn't imply following towards, it demands resisting origin as reactors (living) within generation (process of dying).
I guess I would just have this to say to everyone who has felt like a sheep that has realized what was going on, jumped the fence, and ran off the farm towards the smiling face and into the waiting arms of the guy next door: that rancher may not be your friend.
Like, maybe the first rancher might have even thought of that beforehand.
Imagine life in a cave system, where generation upon generation you have consistent implementation and no opportunity to change course.
This describes much of aboriginal life, where the goal is to continue the existing process; without change.
The desire to suppress innovation in my opinion comes from fear, the propagation of fear has always been the control mechanism used against people and some are able to push past it while many cannot.
When it comes to moving to and fro between control systems / groups it is natural to want for a better situation and also normal to be mislead by the shine.
The process of dying establishes existence (living) within change.
Temporary opportunity (choice) can only exist within the momentum (balance) of ongoing change.
Ones (singular) consent to suggested groups (plural) tempts one into the controlled situation called "reason" aka perceivable singular wanting vs not wanting suggested plural.
One cannot be a plural, since plural (whole process of dying) generates each singular (partial living) through self differentiation, yet one has the free will of choice to ignore this for whatever others are suggesting.
Nature represents the ongoing need, those within represent the temporary want, struggling to sustain self within ongoing need, while resisting the temptation of want. The few exploit the ignorance of the many towards need by tempting them into a want vs not want conflict of reason through suggested information.
The natural order leads from inception towards death...living within implies the need to resist being lead towards death. Others suggest one to follow artificial orders, while willingly ignoring to resist the natural order.
Now question suggested LEAD, verb - "to guide towards" with perceivable...living doesn't imply following towards, it demands resisting origin as reactors (living) within generation (process of dying).
This is a great analogy.
Thanks very much!