I have the PEG-80 Allergy recorded on my hospital records so I never ever have to get the shot (all I did was tell a nurse I was allergic and she recorded it without checking)
Here's my interpretation of Adams' "won/lost" take on this: I think it adds evidence to my thesis that one of the primary manifestations of whatever makes Leftists Leftists is that they begin with the subconscious axiom that they are morally "good".
See, what one would consider a normal reaction from Scott might be something like, "It turns out that, despite what I thought were my best efforts to find the truth, I was in error. Because of that error, I supported positions and advocated actions that got people injured and even killed. And I am not excused from moral fault in this because the truth was knowable. Millions knew it, many told me about it, and I rejected it on unsound grounds. I acted immorally."
But then, that simple analysis and conclusion would contradict the axiom, would it not? Subconsciously, I'm certain, this whole line of argument is thrown out and some other plausible argument consistent with the axiom is substituted, concluding with, "You won."
Yeah totally. He even goes so far as to ascribe the "winning" of unvaxed as getting lucky based upon their irrational suspicion of the government and institutions. It's like he can't admit that it wasn't about winning but it was about a rational evaluation of evidence and a healthy skepticism informed by the past.
They "just got lucky" seems so asinine. That alone pretty much eliminates my respect for Adams as an intellectual. I guess that for all that other stuff he said that I thought was so insightful, he "just got lucky.,
The other very common, "go to" retcon is: "Yeah, it turned out I was incorrect, but I was correct based on information available at the time." No, MFers, there's nothing in any "science" or reasoning that ever forces you to say something incorrect. Ever.
That 4 eyes faggot, and other pseudo liberal demokkkrat regressive Marxo-fascists like him, care more about winning arguments than the truth.
I care more about the truth than my previously held understanding being correct.
In fact, being someone who studies so-called "conspiracies" I actually find relief and feel intrigued and satisfied finding out that something I long thought to be true is not so, and I must rearrange my vast view of life and reality. That makes me far more the intellect that some fag who swears the fake vaccines is safe and effective because overly specialized and trained morons in lab coats said so in a Jew published journal peer reviewed by a Jew or someone who sucks Jew dick for fiat Jew bucks and benefits and permissions. Lackeys.
What a retard. He still thinks it's a he lost we won situation. We all lost you fucking retard, you vaxxed all the females that got brainwashed
The impact upon fertility is alarming and saddening
We all lost not because the vax, but it's because people WILL soon be traumatized to the point of regressing into violent animals.
ONE MORE PUSH and you will see that the true nature of man is nothing other than violent animals.
We cannot afford to forget what they did and their actions should have consequences
I have the PEG-80 Allergy recorded on my hospital records so I never ever have to get the shot (all I did was tell a nurse I was allergic and she recorded it without checking)
they were fooled by jews. you are helping jews. What a retard
you are helping jews by attacking victims of jews. You are a retard.
They were fooled by satanists. They are victims.
No, I am not a whatever that is. I am a regular dude telling you to not act like them.
Scott highlights the problem with liberals:
they believe everything is a "game" (to be won or lost).
This wasn't / isn't a game.
It's just common sense.
Experimental drugs are bad, mmmmkay?
This is Scott’s suicide note to the world
Fuck man, don't give heuristics a bad name. Study them fucking first. Start with Gerd Gigerenzer, you numbnut.
You didn't do heuristics, you did semi-clever self-delusion.
Is part of the run pull. They use this type of speak to argue for amnesty
He still does not get it. He should be trying to help people.
Scott should take another booster, just to be sure.
Here's my interpretation of Adams' "won/lost" take on this: I think it adds evidence to my thesis that one of the primary manifestations of whatever makes Leftists Leftists is that they begin with the subconscious axiom that they are morally "good".
See, what one would consider a normal reaction from Scott might be something like, "It turns out that, despite what I thought were my best efforts to find the truth, I was in error. Because of that error, I supported positions and advocated actions that got people injured and even killed. And I am not excused from moral fault in this because the truth was knowable. Millions knew it, many told me about it, and I rejected it on unsound grounds. I acted immorally."
But then, that simple analysis and conclusion would contradict the axiom, would it not? Subconsciously, I'm certain, this whole line of argument is thrown out and some other plausible argument consistent with the axiom is substituted, concluding with, "You won."
And he's still "one of the good guys".
Yeah totally. He even goes so far as to ascribe the "winning" of unvaxed as getting lucky based upon their irrational suspicion of the government and institutions. It's like he can't admit that it wasn't about winning but it was about a rational evaluation of evidence and a healthy skepticism informed by the past.
They "just got lucky" seems so asinine. That alone pretty much eliminates my respect for Adams as an intellectual. I guess that for all that other stuff he said that I thought was so insightful, he "just got lucky.,
The other very common, "go to" retcon is: "Yeah, it turned out I was incorrect, but I was correct based on information available at the time." No, MFers, there's nothing in any "science" or reasoning that ever forces you to say something incorrect. Ever.
Good point
That 4 eyes faggot, and other pseudo liberal demokkkrat regressive Marxo-fascists like him, care more about winning arguments than the truth.
I care more about the truth than my previously held understanding being correct.
In fact, being someone who studies so-called "conspiracies" I actually find relief and feel intrigued and satisfied finding out that something I long thought to be true is not so, and I must rearrange my vast view of life and reality. That makes me far more the intellect that some fag who swears the fake vaccines is safe and effective because overly specialized and trained morons in lab coats said so in a Jew published journal peer reviewed by a Jew or someone who sucks Jew dick for fiat Jew bucks and benefits and permissions. Lackeys.