Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

15
nato setting up for wwIII with an insufficient amount of troops seems short sighted (media.scored.co)
posted 2 years ago by HonestTruth 2 years ago by HonestTruth +16 / -1
16 comments share
16 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (16)
sorted by:
▲ 8 ▼
– TallestSkil 8 points 2 years ago +10 / -2

Not if the purpose of the war is to have whites slaughter whites so that whites don’t exist anymore.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 2 years ago +6 / -1
▲ 3 ▼
– IGOexiled 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

You're not supposed to say that part out loud...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– CrazyRussian 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

That "natural resources" question looks pretty strange. US have Canada right at the border, with amounts of resources pretty similar to Russia. But somehow there is a lack of resources for West. I'll never believe that Canada somehow resist West resources demand and don't allow research and extraction.

So, hardly it is the question of resources, really, there is something else, political, spiritual, whatever.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– BlueDrache 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Sweden looks like a penis and Finland is the nutsack.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– wereonit 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

What is NATO's goal?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– HonestTruth [S] 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

The goal of the jews is to create khazaria in ukraine 'again' thousands of years later. This is the reason zionism is still alive today, after israel was formed.

like the nazi, the nato is a the tool of the khazarians.

Openly criminal groups have been working on ukraine for decades to get here.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– cxivv 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

troops? Bunch of blue hairs flying drones just right over the border where every now and then a glitch makes them lose control over it while an AI bombs a hospital or other highly demotivating target.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DZP1 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

If your goal is to simply nuke the world and reduce population maybe you don't need ground troops. Of course the moron generation in the elite think they can just ride it out in their bunkers for awhile afterward. Maybe they're just all insane.

I just don't see how the bankers can win if war destroys much of their property, but maybe it's about controlling resources in the future.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– HonestTruth [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

well, I do not accept 'nuke the world' we can't basically. nowhere near enough nukes.

We can poison some area, but it's nothing like the fear mongering they have planted in everyone's head.

I do not think we have any nuclear weapons that would make any significant changes globally.

Russia's Sarmat is the biggest yet and it can really only deliver a grouping of warheads and they would each cause their impacts but meh, nothing to worry about. Unless you are in the target area, but again, not enough nukes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– DZP1 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Israel has plenty off illicit nukes. Between US, Russia, and China and them, we have enough to poison the globe for a long time. I just hope the militaries have enough sense to know right from wrong and revolt against moron politicians.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– HonestTruth [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Well, I am not convinced it is enough even placed strategically with intent to cause global catastrophe, It is my belief, I could be wrong.

In any case, it would be pretty bizarre to happen in more than one or two places at once.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Primate98 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Just a quick note: I believe Israel has only about 4 dozen tactical nukes (~5KT). If you want to know how big that is, one of them blew up Port Said. They stole these a few years back.

And they needed to steal them because they didn't have any of their own. But you know what really convinced me of that? When it "leaked out" that Colin Powell said something like, "Israel has 200 nukes all pointed at Iran!" That was supposed to convince us Israel had nukes. And where did it come from? Powell's AOL email... lol

I get it, they're dumber than we think, but they're not that dumb and stuff like that doesn't leak out without a real shitstorm afterwards. But nope, not a drop of rain fell.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– HonestTruth [S] 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

We have seen this escalation of criminal acts, it seems each boisterous attempt to gather fear and attention has to outdo the prior attempts. This is perhaps reasoning why people are so ignorant to everything, it just keeps piling on and desensitizing everyone constantly results in nobody giving a shit.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - 9slbq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy