THe purpose of war is not to win, but to be forever. How else are you going to make profits?
Also, the war on Russia is about all those natural resources needed for the next century of America.
Thus, Russia has to fall (for USA's benefit) and all the NATO++ members will have to go along or suffer the wrath of USA (military, political, diplomatic, financial, technological and otherwise).
This is the war deciding the next century. Unipolar USA-leade NATO++ vs the many-headed and still internally quarrelling hydra of BRICS+++.
BTW, I'm on neither camps side. The whole thing reeks and the bankers will benefit.
I'm just a bystander, hoping for peace, but it won't come as long as we are tribal, territorial and just go with the propaganda and the dictates.
That "natural resources" question looks pretty strange. US have Canada right at the border, with amounts of resources pretty similar to Russia. But somehow there is a lack of resources for West. I'll never believe that Canada somehow resist West resources demand and don't allow research and extraction.
So, hardly it is the question of resources, really, there is something else, political, spiritual, whatever.
The goal of the jews is to create khazaria in ukraine 'again' thousands of years later.
This is the reason zionism is still alive today, after israel was formed.
like the nazi, the nato is a the tool of the khazarians.
Openly criminal groups have been working on ukraine for decades to get here.
troops?
Bunch of blue hairs flying drones just right over the border where every now and then a glitch makes them lose control over it while an AI bombs a hospital or other highly demotivating target.
If your goal is to simply nuke the world and reduce population maybe you don't need ground troops. Of course the moron generation in the elite think they can just ride it out in their bunkers for awhile afterward. Maybe they're just all insane.
I just don't see how the bankers can win if war destroys much of their property, but maybe it's about controlling resources in the future.
well, I do not accept 'nuke the world' we can't basically. nowhere near enough nukes.
We can poison some area, but it's nothing like the fear mongering they have planted in everyone's head.
I do not think we have any nuclear weapons that would make any significant changes globally.
Russia's Sarmat is the biggest yet and it can really only deliver a grouping of warheads and they would each cause their impacts but meh, nothing to worry about. Unless you are in the target area, but again, not enough nukes.
Israel has plenty off illicit nukes. Between US, Russia, and China and them, we have enough to poison the globe for a long time. I just hope the militaries have enough sense to know right from wrong and revolt against moron politicians.
Just a quick note: I believe Israel has only about 4 dozen tactical nukes (~5KT). If you want to know how big that is, one of them blew up Port Said. They stole these a few years back.
And they needed to steal them because they didn't have any of their own. But you know what really convinced me of that? When it "leaked out" that Colin Powell said something like, "Israel has 200 nukes all pointed at Iran!" That was supposed to convince us Israel had nukes. And where did it come from? Powell's AOL email... lol
I get it, they're dumber than we think, but they're not that dumb and stuff like that doesn't leak out without a real shitstorm afterwards. But nope, not a drop of rain fell.
We have seen this escalation of criminal acts, it seems each boisterous attempt to gather fear and attention has to outdo the prior attempts. This is perhaps reasoning why people are so ignorant to everything, it just keeps piling on and desensitizing everyone constantly results in nobody giving a shit.
Not if the purpose of the war is to have whites slaughter whites so that whites don’t exist anymore.
You're not supposed to say that part out loud...
THe purpose of war is not to win, but to be forever. How else are you going to make profits?
Also, the war on Russia is about all those natural resources needed for the next century of America.
Thus, Russia has to fall (for USA's benefit) and all the NATO++ members will have to go along or suffer the wrath of USA (military, political, diplomatic, financial, technological and otherwise).
This is the war deciding the next century. Unipolar USA-leade NATO++ vs the many-headed and still internally quarrelling hydra of BRICS+++.
BTW, I'm on neither camps side. The whole thing reeks and the bankers will benefit.
I'm just a bystander, hoping for peace, but it won't come as long as we are tribal, territorial and just go with the propaganda and the dictates.
That "natural resources" question looks pretty strange. US have Canada right at the border, with amounts of resources pretty similar to Russia. But somehow there is a lack of resources for West. I'll never believe that Canada somehow resist West resources demand and don't allow research and extraction.
So, hardly it is the question of resources, really, there is something else, political, spiritual, whatever.
Sweden looks like a penis and Finland is the nutsack.
What is NATO's goal?
The goal of the jews is to create khazaria in ukraine 'again' thousands of years later. This is the reason zionism is still alive today, after israel was formed.
like the nazi, the nato is a the tool of the khazarians.
Openly criminal groups have been working on ukraine for decades to get here.
troops? Bunch of blue hairs flying drones just right over the border where every now and then a glitch makes them lose control over it while an AI bombs a hospital or other highly demotivating target.
If your goal is to simply nuke the world and reduce population maybe you don't need ground troops. Of course the moron generation in the elite think they can just ride it out in their bunkers for awhile afterward. Maybe they're just all insane.
I just don't see how the bankers can win if war destroys much of their property, but maybe it's about controlling resources in the future.
well, I do not accept 'nuke the world' we can't basically. nowhere near enough nukes.
We can poison some area, but it's nothing like the fear mongering they have planted in everyone's head.
I do not think we have any nuclear weapons that would make any significant changes globally.
Russia's Sarmat is the biggest yet and it can really only deliver a grouping of warheads and they would each cause their impacts but meh, nothing to worry about. Unless you are in the target area, but again, not enough nukes.
Israel has plenty off illicit nukes. Between US, Russia, and China and them, we have enough to poison the globe for a long time. I just hope the militaries have enough sense to know right from wrong and revolt against moron politicians.
Well, I am not convinced it is enough even placed strategically with intent to cause global catastrophe, It is my belief, I could be wrong.
In any case, it would be pretty bizarre to happen in more than one or two places at once.
Just a quick note: I believe Israel has only about 4 dozen tactical nukes (~5KT). If you want to know how big that is, one of them blew up Port Said. They stole these a few years back.
And they needed to steal them because they didn't have any of their own. But you know what really convinced me of that? When it "leaked out" that Colin Powell said something like, "Israel has 200 nukes all pointed at Iran!" That was supposed to convince us Israel had nukes. And where did it come from? Powell's AOL email... lol
I get it, they're dumber than we think, but they're not that dumb and stuff like that doesn't leak out without a real shitstorm afterwards. But nope, not a drop of rain fell.
We have seen this escalation of criminal acts, it seems each boisterous attempt to gather fear and attention has to outdo the prior attempts. This is perhaps reasoning why people are so ignorant to everything, it just keeps piling on and desensitizing everyone constantly results in nobody giving a shit.