I appreciate what ancient cultures have to say about it particularly Tibetan monks. The fact that every country on the planet obeys the no fly zone over the pole is eye opening.
We'll start wars with eachother but we agree on this no fly zone...just cause.
I have never seen a real picture of the planets (from space), and I have never seen a real picture of the far side of the moon. The moon kinda looks spherical, but we've only ever seen one side. Show me a real picture of those things before you block me lol.
Yes it is subjective, but you can still sway people's opinions with subjective material. However I've never seen any pictures that come close to looking real and they even admit that are cgi/composites etc... Check out Mr. Blue Marble for an example.
Well I was mostly trying to get people to realize there are no probes that orbited saturn or jupiter etc... and took real photos. IF we have 1000s of satellites, and dozens of inter-planetery probes there is no excuse. Yes you can take them from earth but they never look like a planet unless you use a process where you compile 100s or 1000s of pictures into one, to make it appear more like the main stream explanation. This is what venus looks like zoomed in from earth.
there are no probes that orbited saturn or jupiter
Simpleton. What motivates you to claim such nonsense? You got high and watched some other low-IQ jackass tell you so?
I suppose there is no Hubble telescope, either.
If you idiots only had ONE person of science to support you, you might have a case. Still, seriously, you don't have one person who has a degree in physics, astronomy, earth sciences or any other such degree, claim you are correct. You only have uneducated Youtubers.
So let's just ignore all the planetary probes like Voyager we have sent, and they have all sent back thousands of photos. Oh, what's the fucking point, you'll just claim it's all CGI or some other low IQ stuff.
I admit that it is very peculiar and suspicious that we never see the other side of the moon and NASA gives a rather bogus explanation about tides and gravity cooperating perfectly to keep the moon facing one side to earth.
I'm not a flat earther, per se, but i do find the questions and theories compelling and I think too much name calling and mockery goes back and forth instead of people just sticking to the fucking debate.
Jesus christ you fucking idiots are like children. WE HAVE SEEN THE OTHER SIDE!!! it is 100% mapped, cataloged and readily available to view anytime you want. We just sent Armatis and for the first time the moon and earth are in the same image!!
Funny no one could put satellite around moon until 2023? Even though concept and technology of satellites is over 50 years old. And you claim humans were golfing on the moon over 50 years ago.
Remember that NASA footage of them blowing up an asteroid last year? Lol that was fake as fuck. Please tell me you didn't fall for it?
Also, why does skeptical talk about NASA here meet so much backlash when it is commonly accepted the government and Jews have colluded in mass scale eugenics and population control and giving their own citizens bio engineered injections and food?
But if some questions NASA then OH NO YOURE AN IDIOT MUH PLANETS MUH MOONWALKER MADE OUT OF ALUMINUM FOIL AND POORLY RIVETED SHEET METAL!!
If your government, schools and corporations all just tried to forcefully inject you with poison, and we know they lie about climate.....Maybe just consider the mere possibility they are lying to you about space and astronomy too? Without calling people idiots who are wise skeptics? It's not like NASA or our textbooks have credibility at this point.
No, reality does not work that way. You'll need to do better than filibuster false claims. Equally stupid is you and me arguing. So just tell me one accredited scientist that supports your claims, and I will take a look. Very simple.
Global warming has actual climate scientists as anthropogenic skeptics.
Medical doctors with degrees in medicine have vaccine skeptics.
Lol, you idiot. You can't name on scientist, so you just ignore my challenge. I win, you lose. Moron. Get a fucking life or at least know when the entire educated world is on my side, and you have no one except a bunch of children in their mommies' basement poo pooing things you are too ignorant to understand. Fucking cow pattie.
Name a scientist? So you are appealing to authority. That's fallacious.
For example, you can't find me a single Federal politician that will admit that jew jabs are poison. Yet we all know they are. Find me a single politician at Federal level that will say it, though. You can't.
Also, I'm not even a flat earther. I just show them more respect than you do and I don't automatically assume I'm smarter than they are because of my position on this subject.
Also, you know that video of blowing up the asteroid is fake as fuck. So right now you are in a position where you know NASA are fucking liars, but you believe SOME of their lies and believe some people are "idiots" for not believing ANYTHING they say anymore.
You go out into the wilderness and see plants and animals vibrant forests streams rivers lakes and think you’re in hell? If you smell shit everywhere, it might be on you
If you had an education, you would know what spectroscopy is. But because you are old, stupid and unwilling to read challenging books above a great 5 level, you cower in the corner, afraid of the unknown because your brain is too smooth to understand it. You simply cannot understand the size and magnitude of the ball upon which you sit, so your limited IQ resorts to only understanding what you can see instead of what others have gone on to learn. I am sad for you. To go through your entire life thinking the only plausible explanation is in fact, wholly and undeniably incorrect simply because you are too lazy and dumb to do anything but validate your ego with other equally dumb people.
You’re saying the sun and moon are small but like do you think they’re flat round or something else?
I’m distrustful of modern science but I don’t have a horse in the race about shape of the earth, I think the 666 stuff is pretty hilarious and seems par for the course.
So they might be spheres but the earth is flat? interesting. Thanks for being direct with your answer.
As for the moon landing man I’m super skeptical of nasa and the space race but I’m pretty unsure about all of it. I’m confident they’re lying but I’m too uneducated on the topic to really commit either way.
Just for giggles, I clicked your video and the first thing I see is at: 56:45
"The simulator is so close to the real thing there is no way...."
When the reality is that while Apollo 11 landed on the moon, there were 10 earlier Apollos and in fact Apollo 10 filmed the exact track 11 landed on. The film was used in the simulator and gave them ample time to practice.
So, once again, people like you and the fuck sticks that make these videos are working on a fraction of information and are in fact 1000% incorrect because they just do not have the intelligence to know how we got to and landed on the moon.
The moon does not have a hot spot, or lighting that fades in respect to the light source. It is not lit like a sphere reflecting light. The moon cycle changes according to its proximity to the sun; it is an electromagnetic relationship.
Let me first debunk any possibility of the moon being a rock 238k miles away that reflects the sun's light. If you look into the inverse-squar law of light this makes the moons distance and brightness impossible. Basically every time you half the distance to the moon the brightness should be 4 times more intense. Considering the moons brightness from our perspective, it would be insanely bright if you were 238k miles closer using this principle.
When your views are weak and can’t stand against the alternative/dissenting views of others - always block them out! That way you’ll always be protected from learning (especially learning when you’re wrong)!
Just stick your fingers in your ears and scream like a child! That’s what all the smart people do...
The moon is not a rock that floats in the sky and never falls, nor is it made of cheese - only a child would believe nonsense like that!
If you would like to learn about and criticize alternative viewpoints, please join us on flatearthresearch. If you want to ever learn new things, don’t reflexively ignore/block the people who say them - try discussing first!
“Flatties” don’t really exist anyway - that is a psyop.
Flat
Hollow.
I appreciate what ancient cultures have to say about it particularly Tibetan monks. The fact that every country on the planet obeys the no fly zone over the pole is eye opening.
We'll start wars with eachother but we agree on this no fly zone...just cause.
That we can agree on, now is it due to a big cliff or a giant hole...that is the million dollar question.
Can you quote the law?
The Antarctic treaty
I’ve been north of 60 a fair bit. You can watch the glow of the sun at night circle to the north, then eastward and finally rise again in the east.
That's not a law
So is it s law or a treaty?
Can you make up your mind?
Can you quote the part that says that it's a nofly zone?
That's good. Now say it in front of a mirror. And point.
Oh yeah bud, I'm sure you have it all figured out....
yep i laughed !
I kind of hope the earth is flat so we can throw Jews off the edge.
I think you're all wrong. The Earth is dick shaped.
I have never seen a real picture of the planets (from space), and I have never seen a real picture of the far side of the moon. The moon kinda looks spherical, but we've only ever seen one side. Show me a real picture of those things before you block me lol.
Yes it is subjective, but you can still sway people's opinions with subjective material. However I've never seen any pictures that come close to looking real and they even admit that are cgi/composites etc... Check out Mr. Blue Marble for an example.
Well I was mostly trying to get people to realize there are no probes that orbited saturn or jupiter etc... and took real photos. IF we have 1000s of satellites, and dozens of inter-planetery probes there is no excuse. Yes you can take them from earth but they never look like a planet unless you use a process where you compile 100s or 1000s of pictures into one, to make it appear more like the main stream explanation. This is what venus looks like zoomed in from earth.
https://youtu.be/9R897t8GSYQ
Simpleton. What motivates you to claim such nonsense? You got high and watched some other low-IQ jackass tell you so?
I suppose there is no Hubble telescope, either.
If you idiots only had ONE person of science to support you, you might have a case. Still, seriously, you don't have one person who has a degree in physics, astronomy, earth sciences or any other such degree, claim you are correct. You only have uneducated Youtubers.
Ok retard, show me your favorite image from voyager or hubble that you think is so real.
So let's just ignore all the planetary probes like Voyager we have sent, and they have all sent back thousands of photos. Oh, what's the fucking point, you'll just claim it's all CGI or some other low IQ stuff.
What's it like to be a moron?
I admit that it is very peculiar and suspicious that we never see the other side of the moon and NASA gives a rather bogus explanation about tides and gravity cooperating perfectly to keep the moon facing one side to earth.
I'm not a flat earther, per se, but i do find the questions and theories compelling and I think too much name calling and mockery goes back and forth instead of people just sticking to the fucking debate.
Jesus christ you fucking idiots are like children. WE HAVE SEEN THE OTHER SIDE!!! it is 100% mapped, cataloged and readily available to view anytime you want. We just sent Armatis and for the first time the moon and earth are in the same image!!
For fuck sake.
Link me to your cgi image.
Funny no one could put satellite around moon until 2023? Even though concept and technology of satellites is over 50 years old. And you claim humans were golfing on the moon over 50 years ago.
Remember that NASA footage of them blowing up an asteroid last year? Lol that was fake as fuck. Please tell me you didn't fall for it?
Also, why does skeptical talk about NASA here meet so much backlash when it is commonly accepted the government and Jews have colluded in mass scale eugenics and population control and giving their own citizens bio engineered injections and food?
But if some questions NASA then OH NO YOURE AN IDIOT MUH PLANETS MUH MOONWALKER MADE OUT OF ALUMINUM FOIL AND POORLY RIVETED SHEET METAL!!
If your government, schools and corporations all just tried to forcefully inject you with poison, and we know they lie about climate.....Maybe just consider the mere possibility they are lying to you about space and astronomy too? Without calling people idiots who are wise skeptics? It's not like NASA or our textbooks have credibility at this point.
No, reality does not work that way. You'll need to do better than filibuster false claims. Equally stupid is you and me arguing. So just tell me one accredited scientist that supports your claims, and I will take a look. Very simple.
Global warming has actual climate scientists as anthropogenic skeptics.
Medical doctors with degrees in medicine have vaccine skeptics.
Who are the scientists that support flat earth?
Here. It's the dumb blonde women at NASA blowing up an asteroid. This is for gullible audience such as you
Oh my goodness oh ooh looks like we're going straight in ooooh wow orgasm fake asteroid blowing up https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=asBBRP5_oF8
NASA does a shit job of faking this shit.
Lol, you idiot. You can't name on scientist, so you just ignore my challenge. I win, you lose. Moron. Get a fucking life or at least know when the entire educated world is on my side, and you have no one except a bunch of children in their mommies' basement poo pooing things you are too ignorant to understand. Fucking cow pattie.
Name a scientist? So you are appealing to authority. That's fallacious.
For example, you can't find me a single Federal politician that will admit that jew jabs are poison. Yet we all know they are. Find me a single politician at Federal level that will say it, though. You can't.
Also, I'm not even a flat earther. I just show them more respect than you do and I don't automatically assume I'm smarter than they are because of my position on this subject.
Also, you know that video of blowing up the asteroid is fake as fuck. So right now you are in a position where you know NASA are fucking liars, but you believe SOME of their lies and believe some people are "idiots" for not believing ANYTHING they say anymore.
The earth is Hell shaped. It has no form.
You go out into the wilderness and see plants and animals vibrant forests streams rivers lakes and think you’re in hell? If you smell shit everywhere, it might be on you
I do kind of like the 'realm' idea rather than arguing about the physical shape the ground we walk on takes.
If you had an education, you would know what spectroscopy is. But because you are old, stupid and unwilling to read challenging books above a great 5 level, you cower in the corner, afraid of the unknown because your brain is too smooth to understand it. You simply cannot understand the size and magnitude of the ball upon which you sit, so your limited IQ resorts to only understanding what you can see instead of what others have gone on to learn. I am sad for you. To go through your entire life thinking the only plausible explanation is in fact, wholly and undeniably incorrect simply because you are too lazy and dumb to do anything but validate your ego with other equally dumb people.
It says nothing about the heliocentric model. Do you think the sun, the moon, and planets are flat? What do you think they are?
You’re saying the sun and moon are small but like do you think they’re flat round or something else?
I’m distrustful of modern science but I don’t have a horse in the race about shape of the earth, I think the 666 stuff is pretty hilarious and seems par for the course.
You people are fucking hilarious
It’s a valuable skill to be able to answer questions directly.
Do you think the moon and sun are flat? You don’t have to explain everything in the model to answer a simple question.
So they might be spheres but the earth is flat? interesting. Thanks for being direct with your answer.
As for the moon landing man I’m super skeptical of nasa and the space race but I’m pretty unsure about all of it. I’m confident they’re lying but I’m too uneducated on the topic to really commit either way.
Just for giggles, I clicked your video and the first thing I see is at: 56:45
"The simulator is so close to the real thing there is no way...."
When the reality is that while Apollo 11 landed on the moon, there were 10 earlier Apollos and in fact Apollo 10 filmed the exact track 11 landed on. The film was used in the simulator and gave them ample time to practice.
So, once again, people like you and the fuck sticks that make these videos are working on a fraction of information and are in fact 1000% incorrect because they just do not have the intelligence to know how we got to and landed on the moon.
Yeah, cause they don't fuck wit.
How does a flat disk produce shadows and surface features that make it look just like a sphere and which change according to its position?
If the moon is a light source why does it go through a cycle of illumination that corresponds exactly with how it would be lit if the Earth was round?
The moon does not have a hot spot, or lighting that fades in respect to the light source. It is not lit like a sphere reflecting light. The moon cycle changes according to its proximity to the sun; it is an electromagnetic relationship.
Present the model.
Do it here.
Your claims are laughable and cannot be proven whatsoever. Just give up, you are embarrassing yourself.
Great argument
Ok cool. Can you describe the cycle? What lights it ip and what flat earther has documented all that you describe?
Let me first debunk any possibility of the moon being a rock 238k miles away that reflects the sun's light. If you look into the inverse-squar law of light this makes the moons distance and brightness impossible. Basically every time you half the distance to the moon the brightness should be 4 times more intense. Considering the moons brightness from our perspective, it would be insanely bright if you were 238k miles closer using this principle.
Ok, show your calculation
Oh, look. Another YouTube video.
"Research"
When your views are weak and can’t stand against the alternative/dissenting views of others - always block them out! That way you’ll always be protected from learning (especially learning when you’re wrong)!
Just stick your fingers in your ears and scream like a child! That’s what all the smart people do...
The moon is not a rock that floats in the sky and never falls, nor is it made of cheese - only a child would believe nonsense like that!
If you would like to learn about and criticize alternative viewpoints, please join us on flatearthresearch. If you want to ever learn new things, don’t reflexively ignore/block the people who say them - try discussing first!
“Flatties” don’t really exist anyway - that is a psyop.
Mockery is the only tool of the ignorant.
Actually argumentation has always been the tool against unintelligible propositions. That's why we have science. - Logic