The moon does not have a hot spot, or lighting that fades in respect to the light source. It is not lit like a sphere reflecting light. The moon cycle changes according to its proximity to the sun; it is an electromagnetic relationship.
Let me first debunk any possibility of the moon being a rock 238k miles away that reflects the sun's light. If you look into the inverse-squar law of light this makes the moons distance and brightness impossible. Basically every time you half the distance to the moon the brightness should be 4 times more intense. Considering the moons brightness from our perspective, it would be insanely bright if you were 238k miles closer using this principle.
If the moon is a light source why does it go through a cycle of illumination that corresponds exactly with how it would be lit if the Earth was round?
The moon does not have a hot spot, or lighting that fades in respect to the light source. It is not lit like a sphere reflecting light. The moon cycle changes according to its proximity to the sun; it is an electromagnetic relationship.
Present the model.
Do it here.
Your claims are laughable and cannot be proven whatsoever. Just give up, you are embarrassing yourself.
Great argument
Ok cool. Can you describe the cycle? What lights it ip and what flat earther has documented all that you describe?
Let me first debunk any possibility of the moon being a rock 238k miles away that reflects the sun's light. If you look into the inverse-squar law of light this makes the moons distance and brightness impossible. Basically every time you half the distance to the moon the brightness should be 4 times more intense. Considering the moons brightness from our perspective, it would be insanely bright if you were 238k miles closer using this principle.
Ok, show your calculation
Oh, look. Another YouTube video.
"Research"