This is a great video debunking the popular “Truther” claims about Build 7. https://youtu.be/7PpsCCTMP8w
The points brought up in the video are:
• “Why wasn’t building 7 ever mentioned in the 911 Commission Reports?”
This is because the Commission Reports were specifically about the actual targets of the attacks, not collateral damage like WTC 7. It was however investigated in a NIST report which is here https://www.nist.gov/publications/final-report-collapse-world-trade-center-building-7-federal-building-and-fire-safety-0
• “How could it collapse if it never was hit by a plane?”
Pretty simple, huge chunks of burning debris crashed in through the top of WTC 7 from the towers. This not only caused massive structural damage, but also caused a massive fire to spread throughout WTC 7.
Truther deceitfully only ever show pictures of it from the south, where it was not struck by debris, making it seem like it was a perfectly fine building that collapsed out of nowhere, but images of it from the north side clearly show the massive damage WTC 7 sustained from the falling debris
• “Building 7 collapsed in free fall out of nowhere! This is only possible through controlled demolition!”
This is just an outright lie. Footage of the attack clearly shows building 7 folding in on itself over the course of hours before finally collapsing. All footage of the “free fall” conveniently only ever starts right as the building falls, it never shows the footage before of the penthouse caving in.
Here's a better video debunking the "official" claims about Bldg 7
https://www.bitchute.com/video/RLwUgY9GOVN2/
Here’s the full video on 9/11 truther claims being debunked. https://youtu.be/4ml6r7cuKe8
Lol... I watched live as they were talking about 7 and they said "pull it."
On PBS's aired report "Rebuilding America's Defenses," developer and leaseholder of the World Trade Center towers Larry Silverstein admitted "I remember getting a call from the fire department commander telling me they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire … and I said, 'Well, you know, we've had such terrible loss of life … maybe the smartest thing to do is, is 'pull' it … and they made that decision to 'pull' … uh, and we watched the building collapse." The term “pull the building” is industry speak for initiating the demolition of the building.
So Larry planned this whole thing, planted bombs, demolished it by ordering firefighters to go ahead and demolish the building, and then later just admitted to doing this later on televised interview?
Mossad admitted the dancing Israelis were there to observe the results (of their operations). And yes, Silverstein participated in the operation. He specifically for example barred the official photographer for the company from the buildings during the pre-period when Mossad was installing explosives on beams.
And he did say on live TV about 'pulling'.
So Silverstein planned this whole thing, prevented a photographer, but just admitting to all of this on a tv interview? Lol you guys have the most retarded takes possible. Also, what do dancing Israelis have to do with it? There were dancing Palestinians too.
I honestly think being a 9/11 truther is a side effect of being near mentally retarded IQ wise.
No, Silverstein didn't plan it - he participated in the Mossad plans. You never heard of the dancing Israelis??? Either you're awfully ignorant about 9/11 or you're JDF, so take a hike.
I have, I’m asking how does that prove anything? I heard stories of Puerto Ricans celebrating it too in NYC, is this smoking gun evidence that they did it? What do you think about this video? https://youtu.be/UucjbGmJILk
I made this post with a video referencing the NIST report and all of its findings and apparently that’s not solid enough evidence for you guys, but stupid shit like “Muh dancing Israelis” or some literally who reporter saying he heard some other guy saw something about attacks 18 years after the fact are definitive proof of it being Israel or a planned attack? You’re being stupid.
You're an idiot. No, make that a fucking moron, and most likely an Israeli troll. The fact that you deny the dancing Israelis event and the fact they are 100% documented going on TV in Israel explaining that they were there in NY to document the event - with cameras in advance - shows you are here to deflect accountability for the attack from Israel. You JIDF trolls suck ass.
NIST report? That report was complete bullshit and politically influenced.
Great comeback dipshit. Your crazy retard rambling really convinced me.
ashkenazi come from a group of no more than 350 khazarian converts which means they're inbred as fuck. They are turkomongoloid name stealers. They have absolutely no claim to Jerusalem. They are not descended from Shem through Judah. They are neither ethnically or even religiously "jewish". They're just child raping, baal worshipping, inbred, constantly kvetching weaklings
bot shill or troll, either way you preaching to the wrong crowd lol
Only one poster has even attempted to engage with this post. Like most conspiracytards, you guys are pussies who can’t hold your own.
What damage?
This literally did not happen. All footage proves you wrong. All fireman testimonies proves you wrong.
Seconds are not hours.
Wt7 was a perfect text book controlled demolition
No it wasn’t.
Yes it was. Even demolition experts thought it was
I demolish buildings lots. Smaller industrial jobs. Never by means of implosion but none the less I have a good grasp on structures and what is required to take one down. It is with 100% certainty that that building was knocked down by explosive means. It is an impossibility that a office fire could have done that.
No they didn’t. You’re speaking out of your ass.
Refutation of NIST models
https://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
lol, so you want to pretend this shitty report has any value.
Do you have any of the videos you are referencing?
This report is garbage, not worth my time. I would be willing to review the videos in question or perhaps some images.
This seems like a knee jerk emotional reaction. Here is a link to NIST listing what when into their report https://www.nist.gov/world-trade-center-investigation
And the reason of posting this was to squash the point “truthers” make that WTC7 is ignored in the Commission reports, implying it’s some secret the government doesn’t want to touch. The reality is like I explained and WTC 7 was investigated by the government through NIST.
I encourage you to at the very least watch the video I posted.
Strange that the BBC reported that Bldg 7 fell hours before it actually did ... and during the report showed Bldg 7 still standing in the background.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZqP8moItcc
gtfo w/ your bs
Some BBC reporter incorrectly reporting on a high stress event in real time is not evidence of anything. “Truthers” have such high standards for evidence (which you ignore anyway) yet use the most flimsy bullshit to back your your much more unbelievable conspiracy theory.
Here's a peer reviewed paper from university of Fairbanks alaska outlining the issues with nist modeling....
https://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
I encourage you to at the very least read the paper I posted....
In all seriousness, thank you for posting an actual response and not just shitposting. I’m going to look through this.
I attempted to click thru the propaganda video full of spin conjecture and opinion.
I did not find anything that suggests to me there is any credibility at all in the presentation.
The report itself is just reams of written claims with some engineering drawings to attempt to validate the claims.
If there a better collection of the evidence without all the opinionated statements and conjecture? I would prefer to just review the evidence without the salesman.
You’re coming at this way too emotional and dogmatic. What specific claim in the video or the report do you think is a lie and why?
lol, you are hilarious.
Perhaps my username could be a clue for you, but I generally reject anything that is being pushed and prepared to spin a narrative, why now would this be relevant at all?
How after all this time are you going to 'debunk' anything? with some crappy nasal english voice making false claims based on opinion and misinformation.
The report, also trash is clearly just a piece used to attempt to explain away fact and logic with lies and assertions. Typical standard methods.
I would prefer to see the hard evidence and not such useless inputs. Might as well be a cartoon.
There is plenty of evidence about what happened and none of it is here in your 'debunking efforts'
So I think that alone proves the case of why we need not pat attention to false trumpets.
So you didn’t watch the video or read the report at all, and are just refusing to do so and instead angrily shitpost at me instead, got it. This sub 90 iq response is about what I expected from a “truther”, but I did give you the benefit of the doubt and tried to engage with you politely and in good faith.
lol, you are dreaming vividly if you think the garbage you have proposed as a debunking is valid to even hold my time.
From my perspective, your whole reason to produce this garbage post is to waste peoples time with your invalid/incorrect claims.
Absolute crap, nothing in the propaganda video has credibility, its like a shitty hit piece done by a weak minded leftist.
You are a simple minded fool to accept such garbage as fact, you need help in the world of how to analyze for fact.
Carry on being simple elsewhere son.
"... so there were still fears that if that building had fallen sideways, you were going to wipe out a good part of Lower Manhattan. So they did manage for one to take that (bldg 7) down in a controlled implosion later on. And the Exchange was up and running the following Monday.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=gNIzC4a8rLs
A news reporters take 18 years after the attack? What a bullshit source lol.
A news reporter in New York on 9/11, yes very unreliable.
What would he have to gain by lying?
The only "person" spreading bullshit here is you.
As opposed to the vast majority of other news reporters who report the exact opposite? I’m not even sure he’s lying, maybe just remembering it wrong. But someone recalling something 18 years later is bullshit evidence. You know this, but you’re so desperate for anything to back up your conspiracy theory so you take this as gold.
Except the building's blueprints show it was built with explosives for ease of future demolition.
Literally the most retarded claim I have ever heard lmao.
Lots of buildings do.
Funny how "burning trash blew in through a window" which caused building 7 to collapse into its own footprint exactly like a controlled demolition while there are adjacent buildings which had flaming I beams smash through the roof and they didn't fall or even catch fire.
Hmmmmmmmmmmm. It's almost like burning plastic doesn't melt steel reinforced concrete or something. Like you would need thermite and a bunch of dancing israeli "art students " to wire up support columns.
But facts are anti-semitic along with criticizing child rapists so stop asking questions, bigot.
Not burning trash, huge chunks of a building (the tower) crashing in through the ceiling. Nice strawman though.
That's the official story. Explain to me how flaming trash can melt steel reinforced concrete so that the building collapses into its own footprint exactly like a controlled demolition.
Even if what you say is even remotely possible (it's not) then why did it collapse from the bottom instead of just damaging the roof, which happened to other adjacent buildings when the support beams were ejected from the explosion from controlled demolition?
What of the attack on USS Liberty and the lavon affair? Are those "sTrAwMeN" too, fed shill?