This is a great video debunking the popular “Truther” claims about Build 7. https://youtu.be/7PpsCCTMP8w
The points brought up in the video are:
• “Why wasn’t building 7 ever mentioned in the 911 Commission Reports?”
This is because the Commission Reports were specifically about the actual targets of the attacks, not collateral damage like WTC 7. It was however investigated in a NIST report which is here https://www.nist.gov/publications/final-report-collapse-world-trade-center-building-7-federal-building-and-fire-safety-0
• “How could it collapse if it never was hit by a plane?”
Pretty simple, huge chunks of burning debris crashed in through the top of WTC 7 from the towers. This not only caused massive structural damage, but also caused a massive fire to spread throughout WTC 7.
Truther deceitfully only ever show pictures of it from the south, where it was not struck by debris, making it seem like it was a perfectly fine building that collapsed out of nowhere, but images of it from the north side clearly show the massive damage WTC 7 sustained from the falling debris
• “Building 7 collapsed in free fall out of nowhere! This is only possible through controlled demolition!”
This is just an outright lie. Footage of the attack clearly shows building 7 folding in on itself over the course of hours before finally collapsing. All footage of the “free fall” conveniently only ever starts right as the building falls, it never shows the footage before of the penthouse caving in.
Funny how "burning trash blew in through a window" which caused building 7 to collapse into its own footprint exactly like a controlled demolition while there are adjacent buildings which had flaming I beams smash through the roof and they didn't fall or even catch fire.
Hmmmmmmmmmmm. It's almost like burning plastic doesn't melt steel reinforced concrete or something. Like you would need thermite and a bunch of dancing israeli "art students " to wire up support columns.
But facts are anti-semitic along with criticizing child rapists so stop asking questions, bigot.
Not burning trash, huge chunks of a building (the tower) crashing in through the ceiling. Nice strawman though.
That's the official story. Explain to me how flaming trash can melt steel reinforced concrete so that the building collapses into its own footprint exactly like a controlled demolition.
Even if what you say is even remotely possible (it's not) then why did it collapse from the bottom instead of just damaging the roof, which happened to other adjacent buildings when the support beams were ejected from the explosion from controlled demolition?
What of the attack on USS Liberty and the lavon affair? Are those "sTrAwMeN" too, fed shill?