This is a great video debunking the popular “Truther” claims about Build 7. https://youtu.be/7PpsCCTMP8w
The points brought up in the video are:
• “Why wasn’t building 7 ever mentioned in the 911 Commission Reports?”
This is because the Commission Reports were specifically about the actual targets of the attacks, not collateral damage like WTC 7. It was however investigated in a NIST report which is here https://www.nist.gov/publications/final-report-collapse-world-trade-center-building-7-federal-building-and-fire-safety-0
• “How could it collapse if it never was hit by a plane?”
Pretty simple, huge chunks of burning debris crashed in through the top of WTC 7 from the towers. This not only caused massive structural damage, but also caused a massive fire to spread throughout WTC 7.
Truther deceitfully only ever show pictures of it from the south, where it was not struck by debris, making it seem like it was a perfectly fine building that collapsed out of nowhere, but images of it from the north side clearly show the massive damage WTC 7 sustained from the falling debris
• “Building 7 collapsed in free fall out of nowhere! This is only possible through controlled demolition!”
This is just an outright lie. Footage of the attack clearly shows building 7 folding in on itself over the course of hours before finally collapsing. All footage of the “free fall” conveniently only ever starts right as the building falls, it never shows the footage before of the penthouse caving in.
You’re coming at this way too emotional and dogmatic. What specific claim in the video or the report do you think is a lie and why?
lol, you are hilarious.
Perhaps my username could be a clue for you, but I generally reject anything that is being pushed and prepared to spin a narrative, why now would this be relevant at all?
How after all this time are you going to 'debunk' anything? with some crappy nasal english voice making false claims based on opinion and misinformation.
The report, also trash is clearly just a piece used to attempt to explain away fact and logic with lies and assertions. Typical standard methods.
I would prefer to see the hard evidence and not such useless inputs. Might as well be a cartoon.
There is plenty of evidence about what happened and none of it is here in your 'debunking efforts'
So I think that alone proves the case of why we need not pat attention to false trumpets.
So you didn’t watch the video or read the report at all, and are just refusing to do so and instead angrily shitpost at me instead, got it. This sub 90 iq response is about what I expected from a “truther”, but I did give you the benefit of the doubt and tried to engage with you politely and in good faith.
lol, you are dreaming vividly if you think the garbage you have proposed as a debunking is valid to even hold my time.
From my perspective, your whole reason to produce this garbage post is to waste peoples time with your invalid/incorrect claims.
Absolute crap, nothing in the propaganda video has credibility, its like a shitty hit piece done by a weak minded leftist.
You are a simple minded fool to accept such garbage as fact, you need help in the world of how to analyze for fact.
Carry on being simple elsewhere son.