Sen. Lee Introduces Online Age Verification Bill to Protect Teens from Pornography
(CNS News) -- To help protect America's youth from the dangers of pornography, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) introduced a bill on Dec. 13 that would require all pornographic websites to use an age-verification tool to prevent kids under the age of 18 from accessi...
All I'll say about this is I was about 10 when I saw some internet titties for the first time, and to this day, I like them just as much as I did then. Nothing quite as magical as experiencing the wonder for the first time though. Ahh, good memories.
And these motherfuckers want to take that away
Did u graduate to hookers yet or are you still jerking off 24/7?
Back in the 90’s porn sites required money up front. That seemed to work then. If these companies truly were capitalistic, they would have gone to a user fee/subscription model very early on. That they didn’t is proof that it’s a government-backed program.
Ads and user data are far more profitable.
I’d like to see the numbers on that: you could still get user data with a paid subscription service. You could still have ads to a limited degree before your customer base starts to dwindle. I’m sure someone somewhere has done the due diligence on it, but my overall point is this is a Hegelian dialectic.
Politicians could pass legislation that could accomplish the same thing without digital ID, but they won’t.
Umm more porn than fish today. More porn than gas today. What are you subscribing too. Your fetish. They probably cost extra. Nope, more porn than fish.
Subscription doesn't work. Nobody needs it. It is a bullshit profile that shouldn't exist.
Children need parental locks. If people cared about children they'd make a different Internet for them. Or limit their usage of the internet. It could even be done, as an andriod thing something domain. Although it doesn't work. Children meet older children. But it would be like any other thing for children.
No I.D needed. Just a safer Internet for just kids. At what point today? I've suggested it for years and the only thing they got is child locks. Yawn. Hell there's revenue off the catered devices. Phones, tablets, Pcs, TVs. Routes to childproof domains. Instead of a bunch of other locks.
What they got is Google for everybody and it simple puts some crap lock on. It works until they find a different search button.
Instead what that dickhead is suggesting is everybody else gets profiled because of the kids. Porn, is hardly that risk either, with kids. It's a bunch of other content as well.
My hypothesis is that the proliferation of pornography was a result of government/deepstate efforts long ago through current day. I’m saying they created the crisis and as such, this renders the alternative older restriction methods obsolete, just as (((they))) intended. They opened Pandoras Box and there’s no going back.
Make kiddie Internet. So simple. But they don't want smart. They want children corrupted. At what point wasn't there kiddie only devices and a kiddie only Internet domain. Revenue, nope not it. Because they just want to police everything more.
At what point didn't they make a closed network like at the uni or school. If they were clever it would connect by specific device. Devices only sold for children. When they reg it's a child.
Oh no. Dumb locks. Dumbest locks.
Digital I.D nope. The device gets registered like any other dumbphone now. It links into a clean domain. You know your child can't get screwed? Umm umm.
In the Dial Up days, they practically had kiddie internet. I’m talking AOL days when practically nobody knew anything about the internet though. Only reason your kid was on the computer was to lol at like one or two websites filled with cartoons. Man I miss those days.
Yep, I remember that Internet. The bandwidth trolled.
And the reason they don't is a bunch of shitty toys from China. Not quite, but the advertising if they sanitised it, would kill off a bunch of crap targeting kids. Besides they never did it to begin with. It's an alien concept. Imagine running it through the shit they got now. Practically needs new platforms for them social media, you tube, etc.
It would give it far more national control on that content. On those services paying no tax.
But it would stop this topic's crappy debates on how to police the rest of the Internet. Now, any children are in no real danger.
Distinctly the locks don't work. They're bypassed on that many corresponding searches by running their hands over the keyboard. It needs another means and connection. Digital I.D, nope. It polices everybody else for no reason.
Solution is easy: all adult shit goes on a .xxx address. Then it's VERY EASY to block XXX addresses from your router or devices.
The problem is the enforcement mechanisms required would render the internet practically North Korea.
why? Everything is through ICANN. They can remove your site from DNS registries in 5 minutes. Then, unless you have the IP address, your computer won't take you there. AND if you have an entire domain blocked, they can't get to those dns anyways.
It would cost $0. System already in place.
Yeah, but then it’s up to the government to enforce violations within their jurisdictions, right? They’d have to actively look at and define pornography. I’m Not entirely against it provided it’s not the CIA/FBI pedophiles doing it.
This is the responsibility of the parents, not the government.
Hahahahhaaa have you seen modern parents today? My neighbor came to me saying her 42 y/o single Mom (by choice) bestie caught her 11 yo daughter sending butthole and vagina pictures to a “teen” on discord. The “teen” sent back a dickpic of a grown adult schlong.
The Moms response was to take the daughters phone away for a day. She caved because she didn’t want her fish her 11 yo daughter to get depressed. I told her if I ever find out her friends last name, I’m calling the police and reporting it.