The Ukraine narrative and the way it is panning out doesn't make very much sense unless you go back to the predictions back in January, where we all knew they would have a big distraction like WW3 to keep people from noticing the vax die offs. They probably don't know the exact timeline for when everyone is going to start dropping like flies (well...like dead flies), so they need something that can escalate at a moments notice. So they are just playing around over there until the death rates start to skyrocket.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
I work at HR and noone is literally dropping
That's kind of what I mean. If there is going to be a mass culling as a result of the vax, it hasn't happened yet. You'll know it has started when WW3 heats up in order to hide how bad it is.
No. Vax deaths are an incremental statistic, already incorporated into natural causes or other arbitrary underlying conditions, or even COVID.
They're still pushing both to develop agenda where change is being fast paced. Change in the form of energy, and supply lines. Where digital ID seemed to being slipped in under the hood. The disease forced lockdown. Lockdown caused change. Recession. It caused. Apart from speculation the other side to react. Supply lines rerouted.
Both the disease and then the war forwarded their agenda. While seeking to reign control over a World narrative of the climate and disease, forwarding that agenda, of the newer systems forced. They are costly, taxation, infrastructure. Because they supposedly simply had to adapt into that change abruptly instead of it being forced. It attempts like a cauldron of unspeakable brew with all the ingredients added, control. Control where a mad juggler is hoping it doesn't fallout. Control over opposition over population. While singlehandedly forcing agenda.
It's 4d chess. Causation. Reaction. Causation.
But does it fallout? How, at this stage they'd deal peace in 5 seconds later. If any government changes the next simply forces policy through. At this stage it's primed for conflict but it's almost a distraction if it forces agenda. Newer methods forced. Conflict simply controls the narrative. Anything is better than the narrative.
We will save tomorrow by collapsing today. We will be the leaders of the future by changing them every 5 minutes and having no popularity outside of an obnoxious script.
Or what? Think it's pretty much this. Yea why not war. It would be easier than listening to this shit. Because it is simply forcing change. So it drags. Neither side is committed, we'd be directly at it, but instead they blunder into the narrative.