This is a cool video on rocketry, but you'll never convince these people. They've put years of their life into this stuff and they've been lost to sunk cost fallacy; the idea of that time being wasted is a threat to their sanity and so they don't even entertain it.
Ok I did a quick calculation. Some flat earther claim assume that the diameter of the flat earth is about 6500km. That means the circumference is about 40000km
No, I need you to think for a moment how many people and ships would have to be out there and be supplied to blockade a coastline that surrounds the whole flat earth.
most flat earthers know more about astrophysics than people who believe the earth is a globe.
Actually they don't know anything which is why they're a flat-Earther. It may sound like they do, but almost everything, as it relates to the shape of planets, is wrong.
This is a cool video on rocketry, but you'll never convince these people. They've put years of their life into this stuff and they've been lost to sunk cost fallacy; the idea of that time being wasted is a threat to their sanity and so they don't even entertain it.
This also perfectly describes why people refuse to see all religions and supernatural beliefs are a lie. They can't admit they've been believing and living for a lie almost their whole life.
Those videos are so obviously faked, just look at the edges as it pans. You people are in the running for being as dumb as theists and germ theory deniers. Goodness help you if you're all 3.
The flat earth model suggests the earth is not spinning and is flat. The sun moves around the flat earth. If the sun is moving to go over a distant land, it should get smaller in the air, not set over the horizon. Same with rising. It should appear in the distance and grow larger as it comes closer, not rise above the horizon.
An airplane flying over me doesn't rise from the horizon and the set in the horizon. It appears small and distant overhead, larger as it is above me, then shrinks in size at it goes away. It doesn't disappear over the horizon.
Attempts for flat earth theorists to explain this are simply unconvincing to me.
So we can NOT go and see if a dome connects with the land.
Yes, you can. If the Artic is really a wall that surrounds the rest of the world, the coastline would be tens of thousands of km long. How could anyone prevent you from visiting?
I was thinking "wait, how could have a view of the curvature this sharp from only 56 miles up? That's what the curvature would look like from about +800 miles up...", and then I noticed that the curvature appeared sharper when the horizon was near the bottom of the frame and flatter, even concave, when it was nearer to the top of the frame. I thought "well maybe this is some kind of wide-angled fish eye camera like a GoPro". And then I realized it was.
So then I was going to take a screenshot of the wide versus flat and ask the people here if they could help explain it, but right when I went to do that the camera malfunction and stopped recording. I thought "how could they spend tens of thousands of dollars building and launching a rocket like this and not even spend more than a few hundred dollars on making sure they had a camera that could record the whole thing?"
I wonder if maybe the project was run by NASA. They always have the same kind of camera problems.
Well there was that one flat earther dude, wish I could remember his name, that built a shitty homemade rocket and killed himself with it. So there's that.
It's not a label (unless you want it to be, but why would you?) but a descriptor, one that honestly doesn't need to exist. Is there a descriptor for people who lack belief in leprechauns? Lack belief in flying pink unicorns? Nope. However the vast majority of the world believes in some kind of deity, so a word was invented to describe those who lack belief in a god.
So do you lack belief in a god?
Edit: Shit you're a covidian.
I'm triple vaccinated so is almost everyone I know.
a) being partial (living) within whole (process of dying) represents being private within public.
b) a citizen implies being incorporated and governed by suggestions of others; hence in ignorance of perceivable apartheid.
his own
A vessel (living) within motion (process of dying) cannot own (hold onto) without ignoring to resist being moved by, and therewith sustaining self. Holding onto burdens self; which others can exploit by suggesting debt as to drown resistance.
curvature
CURVE, adjective - "bending; crooked; inflected in a regular form" + INFLECT', verb transitive [Latin inflecto; in and flecto] - "to bend; to turn from a direct line or course".
Inception towards death represents the direct line of course for everyone living within, while turning from this direct line represents EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.] aka the temptation to ignore being moved by. Others utilize suggestion to tempt emotion.
fertilizer represents the on going process from inception towards creation. The shit feeds the soil to the many (ones) then plants grow which get grazed upon by the cattle. And becomes shit once more. <3
Also this was meant as a joke-ish....I love your posts :D
This is a cool video on rocketry, but you'll never convince these people. They've put years of their life into this stuff and they've been lost to sunk cost fallacy; the idea of that time being wasted is a threat to their sanity and so they don't even entertain it.
All pictures are fake unless they agree with me.
Let's see some of their calculations and predictions then.
Ok I did a quick calculation. Some flat earther claim assume that the diameter of the flat earth is about 6500km. That means the circumference is about 40000km
How would you blockade a 40000 km long coastline?
You think that the wall is 40km long?
Thank would mean a diameter of 15 km.
No, I need you to think for a moment how many people and ships would have to be out there and be supplied to blockade a coastline that surrounds the whole flat earth.
Are you able to do that?
Because you claim that this is what is happening.
So you are just making shit up again
Actually they don't know anything which is why they're a flat-Earther. It may sound like they do, but almost everything, as it relates to the shape of planets, is wrong.
Correct, it's science.
No i mean things you can test and measure with repeatable and verifiable results.
This also perfectly describes why people refuse to see all religions and supernatural beliefs are a lie. They can't admit they've been believing and living for a lie almost their whole life.
It's not rocket science!
Flat Earthers have done this
what are fish eye lenses
Cool. Let's see the video made by flat earthers.
here’s one
https://youtu.be/ihdZqAoAV9g
And here’s other general information about flat earth, videos are organized in a way to be responses to common questions
https://arete.network/b/FlatEarth/p/3405/flat-earth-resources
Peace!
Source of the video? There is no mention of who made it and when.
The claim was that
So far, I have not seen any videos by flat earthers shooting rockets to the edge of the atmosphere.
The claim was that a flat earther made a video using a rocket.
None of the videos shows that.
Those videos are so obviously faked, just look at the edges as it pans. You people are in the running for being as dumb as theists and germ theory deniers. Goodness help you if you're all 3.
Flat Earthers still can't explain a sun set.
Their explanations for sunrise and sunset are bogus to me.
The one where you claim that light somehow cannot penetrate the air beyond a certain range without providing any evidence for it.
So, what's the distance that light can shine through the atmosphere and what's your source for it?
Just give me a number, calculations and what experiment was done do support it.
I already know that you won't do it.
The flat earth model suggests the earth is not spinning and is flat. The sun moves around the flat earth. If the sun is moving to go over a distant land, it should get smaller in the air, not set over the horizon. Same with rising. It should appear in the distance and grow larger as it comes closer, not rise above the horizon.
An airplane flying over me doesn't rise from the horizon and the set in the horizon. It appears small and distant overhead, larger as it is above me, then shrinks in size at it goes away. It doesn't disappear over the horizon.
Attempts for flat earth theorists to explain this are simply unconvincing to me.
This is nice, easy, and reproducible test. I'll try this on my Canon. I'll have to order a solar lens first. I'll report back in a few weeks.
So no, they haven’t. And no, it isn’t.
I wish I had that kind of money. I want to see stars from orbit.
They had cgi in the 1950s?
You claim they are cgi. Show it.
Why do you only post youtube videos? Is that all there is?
I don't get why people get angry over this. It's good to question conventional wisdoms.
You claim there is an invisible dome / firmament
At what aproximate altitude is this firmament dome at?
Yes, you can. If the Artic is really a wall that surrounds the rest of the world, the coastline would be tens of thousands of km long. How could anyone prevent you from visiting?
How many millions of military and how many thousands of ships do you think are required to patrol an ice wall that surrounds the whole world?
The whole fucking world. How long do you think that wall is?
That would be a naval blockade bigger than anything else. The logistics for that would use up unimaginable resources.
I was thinking "wait, how could have a view of the curvature this sharp from only 56 miles up? That's what the curvature would look like from about +800 miles up...", and then I noticed that the curvature appeared sharper when the horizon was near the bottom of the frame and flatter, even concave, when it was nearer to the top of the frame. I thought "well maybe this is some kind of wide-angled fish eye camera like a GoPro". And then I realized it was.
So then I was going to take a screenshot of the wide versus flat and ask the people here if they could help explain it, but right when I went to do that the camera malfunction and stopped recording. I thought "how could they spend tens of thousands of dollars building and launching a rocket like this and not even spend more than a few hundred dollars on making sure they had a camera that could record the whole thing?"
I wonder if maybe the project was run by NASA. They always have the same kind of camera problems.
Any thoughts on these anomalies? Or no thoughts?
Well there was that one flat earther dude, wish I could remember his name, that built a shitty homemade rocket and killed himself with it. So there's that.
The horizon doesn’t curve at any attainable altitude. This image is due to distortion (typically barrel distortion from the lens).
Though it is certainly impressive for a private rocket to get 56 miles up. How many people worked on it and how much did it cost to build?
The answers to those questions may explain why most people make observations like this with balloons available for a couple hundred bucks.
How far up is the firmament? how can you observe it?
If you cannot observe it how do you know that it's there?
No, you don't. You chose to believe it.
You cannot even coherently explain your flat earth model.
No you don't.
You're saying some good logic, you an atheist?
I don't like such labels
It's not a label (unless you want it to be, but why would you?) but a descriptor, one that honestly doesn't need to exist. Is there a descriptor for people who lack belief in leprechauns? Lack belief in flying pink unicorns? Nope. However the vast majority of the world believes in some kind of deity, so a word was invented to describe those who lack belief in a god.
So do you lack belief in a god?
Edit: Shit you're a covidian.
Dammit why are most atheists liberal retards? https://scored.co/c/Atheist/p/141rjThFxK/atheism-is-at-war-with-psychopat/c
Use the logic and reasoning you've demonstrated here and apply it to the covid vaccines. c/nonewnormal
a) being partial (living) within whole (process of dying) represents being private within public.
b) a citizen implies being incorporated and governed by suggestions of others; hence in ignorance of perceivable apartheid.
A vessel (living) within motion (process of dying) cannot own (hold onto) without ignoring to resist being moved by, and therewith sustaining self. Holding onto burdens self; which others can exploit by suggesting debt as to drown resistance.
Inception towards death represents the direct line of course for everyone living within, while turning from this direct line represents EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.] aka the temptation to ignore being moved by. Others utilize suggestion to tempt emotion.
Is that some sovereign citizen bullshit?
Severe autism.
a) citizen (incorporated by others) contradicts sovereign (superior to all others)...a suggested litmus-test for free will of choice.
b) "some" (a portion greater or less) implies the choice of partial (living) within whole (process of dying) aka the choice to grow within loss.
c) bullshit represents excellent fertilizer.
fertilizer represents the on going process from inception towards creation. The shit feeds the soil to the many (ones) then plants grow which get grazed upon by the cattle. And becomes shit once more. <3
Also this was meant as a joke-ish....I love your posts :D